Not using cellular connectivity I get about 60 hours without enabling Low Power Mode
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Watch Ultra: How to Get Up to 60 Hours of Battery Life
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Which is why you should get a device that meets your needs. If the Garmin does but the AWU doesn't, get the Garmin.
Personally, I bought the AWU because I can rig it for red on the Explorer face. Can't do that on a Garmin.
Doesn't Garmin require Garmin Connect for tracking, etc.?
Some sort of SIM is needed for any device's cellular connectivity, what is your point?
Or you have it without having a phone with you.
You can disable low power during a workout and enable it for normal use if you want.
Wait a second, you got my attention with the flip flop. So we aren't comparing apples to apples?
What? No idea what that means.
The point re the phone and cellular connectivity is you ‘have’ to have an iPhone to have an AW.
It is Apple, it Garmin, who are positioning their AW Ultra up against sort watches, not the other way around. They should be ridiculed for it. Peloton and Apple Fitness users are not Ultra athletes.
Last edited by a moderator:
Aside from the battery, I want the Ultra because of its rugged nature. I love rugged stuff, and I'm always scared of scratching my Apple Watch. Plus, I want beeg ｀0ω0´
The bands are absolutely amazing. The feel is very pleasant. Great stuff!
If you're out for a multi-day hike, you don't really need to measure your heart rate and gps every couple seconds. It's plenty to check it once every couple minutes. And thats what this is for. Not for a 5k run in a park.
That’s true, but it’s the ‘reality distortion’ of marketing a product that bears no resemblance to its actual ability when placed against the companies marketing of it.
I'm getting 60+ hours routinely, without these power-saving settings. Battery life... the killer app.
There are certain features that some people may not need that keep draining the battery. They have the option to preserve the battery for features that they need most.
Wait, you take apple marketing seriously at all? You’ve already lost before you even start any argument.
Apple’s marketing has been misleading and deceiving since day 1 and never change in the past few decades. That’s part of how they stay in business.
Except, there’s no option to configure what feature is desired the most and how frequent the data is updated. It’s all dictated by Apple. If this Apple Watch ultra really wants to be suitable for all sorts of situations, this whole low power mode thing has to be user configurable and highly customisable.
And you have to accelerate and decelerate over ridiculous distances. If there is any amount of traffic, someone will beat you for driving like that
Yup, Garmin owners practice real sports and get more and better metrics. Totally insecure people…
Same here, I get over 60 closer to 70 hours without using LPM. I think what people may be missing is that this LPM is really workout centric, for ULTRA users since it really takes the heavy frequent HR and O2 sampling data out of the mix, and as Apple indicates expects that during that 60 period, 25% of the time, 15 HOURS is going to be spent TRACKING workouts. I don’t think there are many users in that category here.
Over the 60-70 hours I’m getting with AWU, I’m tracking ~ 3 hours of workouts across two disciplines usually In addition to everything else the watch is doing.
Wake up. 60 hours battery life with almost no metrics is not insane…
But oddly enough Garmin and Garmin owners keep comparing them to smartwatches
My Casio WaveCeptors last about 60 months on a full charge and don’t annoy me with notifications either.
Have they figured out to connect my foot pod to an Apple Watch?
Would love my cycling power meter during riding on my Apple Watch too. What’s the eta for these basic sensors coming to the ultra? Oh never? Damn.
Technically thats not how mileage testing or ratings are done at all, but similar to this thread things like AC are off, there is only ONE passenger, the vehicle isn’t carrying any load, it’s broken in first and is driven usually without traffic between 48-60 mph to achieve what the EPA considers the vehicles rated range in MPG.
I’ve almost never been able to achieve an EPA rated range in my vehicles, even when traveling usually 15-20% above posted speeds.
I looked for a more detailed description of this battery life for Garmin Instinct and here's what I see from their own website:
The Garmin Instinct also only has Bluetooth and Ant+ connection, both protocols that are very low powered. Try turning off the Apple Watch Ultra's cell and wifi abilities, I bet the battery life will go on for a lot longer too.
In other words: it's not exactly honest to say X smartwatch has better battery life when details about their capabilities and similarities/differences aren't really mentioned. It's not exactly a like to like comparison ;-)
Also, I'm not here defending Apple or the Ultra. I'm merely trying to say when comparing, let's be honest WHAT is it we are actually comparing.