Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
A defect-free AW is already waterproof to 1 meter for 30 minutes.....
Just to add to this......

As you probably know the use of or should I say misuse of and complete lack of comprehending the terms 'waterproof' and 'water resistant' by the media and *general public really irks me.

Water resistant: resist water ingress (and waterproof) to its minimum objective rating

Waterproof: not such thing without a qualifier....so.....resist water ingress (and waterproof) to its minimum objective rating

[rant]They are the same thing but you continuously read and hear in articles about devices that are 'not waterproof' or 'only water resistant' when the reviewers/reporters don't seem to have a clue what they are talking about.[/rant]

So the :apple:Watch is 'waterproof' to IPx7 rating or the :apple:Watch is 'water resistant' to the IPx7 rating. The same can be said for ANY watch or device that carries a rating and makes a 'water' claim.

*Of course the general public is just echoing the media's misconception.
 
Last edited:
Just to add to this......

As you probably know the use of or should I say misuse of and complete lack of comprehending the terms 'waterproof' and 'water resistant' by the media and *general public really irks me.

Water resistant: resist water ingress (and waterproof) to its minimum objective rating

Waterproof: not such thing without a qualifier....so.....resist water ingress (and waterproof) to its minimum objective rating

[rant]They are the same thing but you continuously read and hear in articles about devices that are 'not waterproof' or 'only water resistant' when the reviewers/reporters don't seem to have a clue what they are talking about.[/rant]

So the :apple:Watch is 'waterproof' to IPx7 rating or the :apple:Watch is 'water resistant' to the IPx7 rating. The same can be said for ANY watch or device that carries a rating and makes a 'water' claim.

*Of course the general public is just echoing the media's misconception.

Yet people have been careful to say the sapphire crystal is only scratch resistant to a degree but not scratchproof. Perhaps this is because they can readily understand that a diamond can still scratch it.
 
It is. You got one that was not sealed properly. Take it to Apple and they will repair or replace. I have washed mine and even done some pool and not a bit of a problem. Have people here who swim and shower all the time with their watches and never had a problem. Yours is simply defective and Apple will take care of it.

My watch was 2 months out of warranty so I had to pay the $199 for a replacement. I submitted an extended warranty claim with MasterCard and it was approved today.
 
I was wearing mine into the pool (max depth 5 feet) in the community and after a few different days at the pool I got what you are describing. I actually heard a pop, after getting out of the pool for a while, and looked at my watch to see that there was a black ink looking blob that covered half the screen. I called apple and told them what happened and they sent a replacement without question. I have AC+ but they didn't charge me a replacement fee or anything else. Perhaps you should call it in instead of taking it in.
 
Did they ask for you serial number?


I was wearing mine into the pool (max depth 5 feet) in the community and after a few different days at the pool I got what you are describing. I actually heard a pop, after getting out of the pool for a while, and looked at my watch to see that there was a black ink looking blob that covered half the screen. I called apple and told them what happened and they sent a replacement without question. I have AC+ but they didn't charge me a replacement fee or anything else. Perhaps you should call it in instead of taking it in.
 
They merely say "submerging the watch is not recommended." It is indeed rated waterproof to 1 meter for up to 30 minutes and they're obligated to warrant it as such.

There are no watches made that I know of which are actually "waterproof". I have mostly dive watches in my collection, and every single one of them is "water resistant". They also all say not to operate any of the knobs/dials in the water.

The strongest rating generally available is a "diver's 300m". This is stronger than a simple "water resistant to 300m".
 
There are no watches made that I know of which are actually "waterproof". I have mostly dive watches in my collection, and every single one of them is "water resistant". They also all say not to operate any of the knobs/dials in the water.

The strongest rating generally available is a "diver's 300m". This is stronger than a simple "water resistant to 300m".

Notice I wrote waterproof to 1 meter for 30 minutes. It's pointless to argue sementics but they mean the same thing to a given depth/time. I'm well aware there's no such thing as a "waterproof watch."
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.