Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If it's just a 4 digit code then as a security measure it's garbage.
No it's not a big thing but it's one more thing. Having to log into my wristwatch when I put it on is so kludgy, so cumbersome, so...not what Apple strives to be.

What else would you want it to do, though? Maybe touch ID, I guess, and press your finger to the watch?
 
So you enter your PIN and can make payments. Then every night you get home and take it off to charge and the next day you have to re enter the PIN. Sounds like just one more POS to remember every morning while I'm getting ready for work. No thanks.

EDIT: Apparently needfx realized the same thing I did.

Well since the US is joining the rest of the world and rolling out chip and pin, you choices are soon going to be enter you pin for your watch at your first transaction (no one said you have to do it first thing, just by the first transaction) or enter it at every transaction after pulling out your card and stabbing it into the reader, or pulling out your iPhone 6, scanning your finger and doing it that way.
 
Seems too cumbersome for a device that you have to charge every night. You would need to input the PIN at least once a day.
 
Interesting idea but it doesn't have capacitive touch or pressure sensors on the back of the watch

then they're going to have to make use of the sensors that monitor pulse to also confirm uninterrupted contact without relying on presence of a pulse for that contact monitoring feature.

Otherwise the payment system isn't going to work with a prosthetic, and I doubt they'd walk into that particular PR faux-pas
 
Seems too cumbersome for a device that you have to charge every night. You would need to input the PIN at least once a day.

Oh FFS lol.

How many times per day does a user input their pin using a debit card? Unlocking their pre-5S iPhone?

This Watch and all other devices like it will lead to LESS work for a person for certain tasks, but a lot of you are acting like this is somehow MORE work.

No. It's just NEW. You want new toys and things, but you're stuck in your old ways and being cranky.
 
Why not have it prompt you to do touchID on your phone once you put the watch on?. Then the watch knows it's on the right person. The phone can then authorize the watch to act as a proxy.

Then have the watch key into something unique about your heart rhythm. If it's removed or moved quickly to a different person, it should be able to sense this.
 
Seems too cumbersome for a device that you have to charge every night. You would need to input the PIN at least once a day.

The pin program would launch automatically with a full screen of ten digits. Punching in the code would take two seconds. Probably less time than putting on the watch to begin with.
 
Oh FFS lol.

How many times per day does a user input their pin using a debit card? Unlocking their pre-5S iPhone?

This Watch and all other devices like it will lead to LESS work for a person for certain tasks, but a lot of you are acting like this is somehow MORE work.

No. It's just NEW. You want new toys and things, but you're stuck in your old ways and being cranky.

Excellent point!
 
Great, so instead for grabbing your watch, they'll cut off your arm and use it for purchasing beer why you're bleeding to death. :)

They should use the heartbeat sensors to make sure the arm it's attached to is alive to authorize payment. :)
 
Why are so many people complaining about having to enter the PIN every time they put the watch on? THAT'S EXACTLY THE POINT! So you don't leave your watch lying around and someone steals it and starts making purchases.

It's assuming that between entering your PIN and taking your watch off you are aware of the whereabouts of your wrist. Enter the PIN once when you start shopping and you're done. Personally, I go shopping once or twice a week at most, so I wouldn't even need to the PIN every day (not that I couldn't spare those 1.2 seconds every morning anyway).
 
I didn't read all the way through to see if they spoke up already, but...

At least one person on this forum in the past few weeks predicted exactly this, that the watch could be used for NFC payments and would watch to see if it had been removed. So kudos to them.

A downside is that it's another drain on the battery. Wonder how often it tests.
 
I nailed this prediction :cool:

you won't have to enter your pin, just touch the phone touch id once in response to a pop up notification.
 
I have bony wrists. With most watches I wear the back is rarely plastered up against the back of my wrist. How tight are people going to have to wear this thing? I think there's going to be a lot of re-entering your pin.

Instead of merely keeping a sensor warm, it could be more related to the infrared guns that they sometimes use in delis (the ones that give you a ballpark temp of cooked chicken from 20 feet away). They get less accurate the further you go back, it's possible a small sensor + subtle readings are enough to be apply to the Apple watch.

Granted I don't know much about the tech in these, so I could easily be wrong.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Seems too cumbersome for a device that you have to charge every night. You would need to input the PIN at least once a day.

Entering a pin once a day? The HORROR!

People used to enter pins multiple times a day to unlock their smartphone (and still do for Android smartphones).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.