Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My credit card uses something similar to NFC and it doesn't have a battery, so I can't imagine it's that much of a drain.

Think they mean the 'constant contact with your arm' check (i.e. how many seconds it waits between doing that check), not the power requirements of performing an NFC transaction
 
Not very secure. Crafty thieves would just have a slither of plastic at body temp to slide underneath the watch as they nab it. Im sure someone will start selling a tool. Bad idea to leave something authorised for a long time period. Asking for trouble.

So someone is going to create a magical device to slide under someones wrist that also has a heart beat so the watch is somehow tricked and using another device to unbuckle the watch... as well as stealing the phone with there third hand since the watch wouldn't work otherwise.

Or the salient could just steal the person's wallet and use the person's credit card like all thieves do. Your credit card is authorized for use indefinitely compared to the watch and people rarely ever ask to see ID's or check signatures and with a credit card you can order online compared to the watch which wouldn't show a number.

So tell me again how the watch will be less secure than what everyone is doing now?
 
I dunno about genius, I can see this being hacked. Now an ECG of your heartbeat would be truly secure and genius.

It wouldn't work everytime your heart beat changes though. Compared to just requiring touchid on phone to unlock it once and stays unlocked until you take it off. And to people saying they will cut off your arm, I think a much more realistic option would be for them to just steal your wallet/credit card in your pocket than cutting through bones just to get a credit card with fraud protection.
 
Great job Apple. Wish i could i buy the watch and iPhone 6 too.

Thinking alternately
iPhone 5S would tempt to cut your thumb, :apple: Watch goes further, now thieves will have to go for the whole hand with part of wrist :D. I wonder whats next:(
 
Are you even paying attention: It's an authorization through the phone (touch ID activation) and a confirmation on the watch. If you don't like it, DON'T USE IT!!! USE YOUR PHONE INSTEAD.
There are 100's of other things the watch is good for.
This is actually a balance between convenience and security.
It's not "kludgy"...I guess some people are just prima donnas...

If it's just a 4 digit code then as a security measure it's garbage.
No it's not a big thing but it's one more thing. Having to log into my wristwatch when I put it on is so kludgy, so cumbersome, so...not what Apple strives to be.
 
Why not have it prompt you to do touchID on your phone once you put the watch on?. Then the watch knows it's on the right person. The phone can then authorize the watch to act as a proxy.

This is exactly what I was thinking... seems like the perfect solution. This way payments would always be using Touch ID for verification.
 
So you enter your PIN and can make payments. Then every night you get home and take it off to charge and the next day you have to re enter the PIN. Sounds like just one more POS to remember every morning while I'm getting ready for work. No thanks.

EDIT: Apparently needfx realized the same thing I did.

I have to re-enter my passcode on my iPhone NOW about ten times a day. So the difference here is... ????
 
Then the pulse would stop. But honestly this is really stupid. You would give up your pin if someone was threatening your life or removal of your hand I mean come on

but the blood would cause liquid damage and the watch might not work....

And seriously, lie about the pin. They aren't holding u at gunpoint to buy condoms and cigarettes at the walgreens.

The logical thing would be to have a kill switch that you can activate in the phone (assuming they dont steal that too) or in icloud
 
Every single time you make a transaction withOUT the Watch, you're doing more steps than simply waving your wrist in front of a reader.

Jesus H Christ... what more do you people want?!

What people WANT is to come up with really, really stupid objections.

----------

I think they meant kill the owner, leave the watch on the body.

Then drag the body into Home Depot.
 
So the key to contactless payments is constant contact.

Irony is Apple's virtue. :)

Honestly, I am just excited to get this watch. I haven't had any kind of watch since 10 years ago. This will be my first.
 
So you enter your PIN and can make payments. Then every night you get home and take it off to charge and the next day you have to re enter the PIN. Sounds like just one more POS to remember every morning while I'm getting ready for work. No thanks.

EDIT: Apparently needfx realized the same thing I did.

You people have really outdone yourselves in terms of the vapidity of these observations. It really is a remarkable accomplishment.
 
I have to re-enter my passcode on my iPhone NOW about ten times a day. So the difference here is... ????

Only ten? I think I have to unlock my phone at least 50 times everyday.

----------

You people have really outdone yourselves in terms of the vapidity of these observations. It really is a remarkable accomplishment.

People just want to appear smart by objecting anything. But when they tried too hard, they really looks silly. "Why the sky is blue, the colour is so boring."
 
Why are we back to pin codes? Why not ask the user to use the touch id to "arm" the payment system on the watch when it is first attached to the wrist.
 
So you enter your PIN and can make payments. Then every night you get home and take it off to charge and the next day you have to re enter the PIN. Sounds like just one more POS to remember every morning while I'm getting ready for work. No thanks.

EDIT: Apparently needfx realized the same thing I did.

If you have a security code, or use TouchID, you have to unlock it EVERY time you pick up your phone. How can you possibly see it being a problem entering a security code every time you put the watch on? Unless you're Paris Hilton and have butlers and maids for everything, grow up.
 
If you have a security code, or use TouchID, you have to unlock it EVERY time you pick up your phone. How can you possibly see it being a problem entering a security code every time you put the watch on? Unless you're Paris Hilton and have butlers and maids for everything, grow up.

I can't imagine the usual number of times someone would put a watch on per day would make this much of an issue.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.