Yep, and those 50 year old watches do what they did 50 years ago.
Tell time.
If you want your watch to do more than than time related things, the 3 year watch is your new paradigm.
This, and coupled that with a decline in their customer service, and I ditched Fitbit too. My charge HR 1 died 3 weeks out of warranty due to a manufacturing defect, and they refused to replace it. That's a far cry from the absolutely fantastic support they used to have, so I said fine, I'm bailing for Apple.Partially this, but I also think Fitbit's own arrogance has contributed to their decline. They refuse to support Apple Health integration (even though they said they would) and forced to their users to choose an ecosystem. I chose Apple. It appears that many others did also. I ditched Fitbit and I never looked back.
I'm certainly loving mine -- one of my most satisfying Apple purchases in years, maybe ever.
Yep, and those 50 year old watches do what they did 50 years ago.
Tell time.
If you want your watch to do more than than time related things, the 3 year watch is your new paradigm.
I'm sorry but when I got my Apple Watch my Fitbit usage went to ZERO
Just wait until people realize that these watches last 3 years, not 50 years like other watches
Just the opposite for my uses, got Apple Watch, hardly ever pull my iPhone out of wherever it is located. Downgraded my iPhone to an SE, have not looked back. My iPhone now a Hub for my Apple Watch. If I need to do some serious replies to messages or other communication needs, use my iPad. Besides having mom on wrist to remind you to Breath, priceless!The things the Apple watch does, including tell time, are all replicated on a smartphone which virtually everyone carries nowadays. If you don't have a smartphone, you won't enjoy most of the features of an Apple watch either.
The Apple Watch is yet another screen that alerts to various types of communication and does fitness stuff. The fitness stuff is really the best use case so far IMO and I can understand someone getting one for that.
I'll buy if it gets a facetime camera--but only because it would then fulfill one of the technology promises from the 60's featured on the Jetsons. Not because it would actually be useful.
Well, many of those other watches do cost more than the AW. Considering I get more utility from the AW than a standard branded watch, the AW provides better value for me.
Of course, this is knowing the fact that AW only work with iPhones, while the rest of the competitors are platform agnostic. So being able to garner that marketshare when your base market is already smaller than everybody else is quite a feat. Gotta admit that whether you like the AW or not.
This is Apple's problem with the fitness market. The Apple Watch can't compete on the high end or the low end. The high end is dominated by Garmin who make the best GPS watches for running, cycling, swimming, etc. If you are serious about any of these sports, you probably already have a Garmin watch.
Sure, if the purpose of getting a "watch" is for investment, I agree with you.But to be fair, those more expensive watches (Rolex, Omega) will likely also appreciate in value. Not sure if that will be the case with an Apple watch.
But they are two different animals. Both serve a purpose.![]()
They are both wearables and competing for the same space on the wrist. It clearly shows that the demand is not in smartwatches, but in sports bands.