I never said they don't pay for
anything. I made a good natured post (hence the grinning face) that pointed out that the Federal Government has little to do with all of the things listed in that original post. You then felt the need for some reason to be very condescending to me.
The fact remains that the majority of funding for all of those things is local. Sure, someone can post a link to a government website showing that the Federal Government has an educational grant program... but does that mean they build and maintain local elementary, middle, or high schools? Sure, someone can point to some federal programs that offer funding for specific health initiatives, but does that mean the federal government is in the business of building local hospitals? Or maintaining or operating them? Sure, you pointed to an article showing a Federal program to help with a few specific highway programs.... but does that mean the Federal Government builds and maintains local roads.
See chart below. Of 4.12 million miles, the Federal Government is responsible for roughly 3%... just 3%! And this principally Interstate highways, and parks, etc.
So... between your assertion that the Federal Government pays for roads, and my assertion that local governments do.. I'll stand by mine.
But if you want to have a decent discussion in the future... try to not start out each post by being so condescending. Even in situations where you could be correct in a debate, you won't persuade anyone to your link of thinking if you completely insult them at the go.
View attachment 740228