Not even close.
The previous explanation seemed clear enough, but let's try again, this time quoting Judge Koh as to why she did not allow them as prior art:
So the simple fact is that they were not included because they weren't specifically listed as prior art evidence in time.
If you still have trouble understanding what transpired, please ask for further clarification.
No, I'm clear...
Again it's extended verbiage commentary that translates probably more precisely into: "This is total rubbish and I'm not interested in having my court turned into a 3-Ring Circus."
Judges generally allow in what they believe to be germane and if it gets overturned on appeal so be it.