Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Such a terrible argument. If i connect a keyboard and mouse, then I DONT NEED the touch screen. Windows can do it, why can't apple?

Because when you don't have a mouse and keyboard connected you won't have iPadOS' dumbified UI to hold your hand. Plus, of course, then Apple can't convince you that you need to buy 2 devices from them.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Kal Madda
Creating a two tier iPadOS just screams to me Apple purposely keeping the other (current) iPad’s are effectively toys and for some reason you have to go to a 14” screen size with a likely huge price tag for it to suddenly become the “computer” they have always claimed it is?
 
I thought the 14” was scrapped and we were getting a 16” iPad 😂 let’s make up some more “leaks”, there’s clearly not enough bs floating around :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yammabot
I get that iPadOS isn't great and we want better (I desperately do too).

But putting an OS that is not optimized for touch is not a good user experience.
Aren’t they supposedly working on a touchscreen MacBook? If so, I wonder what the excuse will be then on why MacOS can’t run on the iPad.


Maybe then they’ll say the pencil distorts the users dexterity so no way they can use macOS on the iPad 🤣
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Kal Madda
Never seen the entire product line this convoluted
That because you have all kinds of fake stories submitted online as things that are actually coming that at best are just rumors. This larger 14.1 iPad Pro story isn’t new, just like 2021 15” MBA rumor. We got stories from about how little Apple OS’s will change, or something else like Apple having a terrible time selling anything.

Truth be told the press, financial analysts, and rest are desperate to be right about something with Apple saying nothing. Yes there is a light at the end of this tunnel, only 39 days to June 5th. ;)

This truly been a year that everything suggested is too much for everything to be true.
 
Last edited:
Such a terrible argument. If i connect a keyboard and mouse, then I DONT NEED the touch screen. Windows can do it, why can't apple?

Being able to do it = the Microsoft way

Being able to do it with a great UX = the Apple way

It is a monumental challenge to design a coherent architecture and user experience for the two modes that a user might potentially switch at any time, especially if we're thinking of having iPadOS switch to MacOS when a keyboard & mouse are attached.

Perhaps we'll get there at some point, but anyone who thinks you just slap it on and call it a day lives in fairy land.
 
I’m sure every iPad they have could run this “special” iOS 17 version.

More gimmicks to introduce yet another unnecessary iPad variant.

There’s no end to the useless products they are releasing in order to keep prices going up.

Lol reading Steve Jobs’ latest book he said Apple were heading toward bankruptcy in the early 90’s because the products were only 25% different from when he left 10 years earlier and they were charging prices that were too high. Also he was confused about what products and configurations were actually in each product line because there were so many products, like 20+.

This same observation applies for todays Apple.
Couldn't agree more. An unimaginative logistics expert does not a CEO make.
 
I completely agree. The iPad could do so much more if it had a better OS. The iPhone OS experience is great for that form factor. It's a stretch, and always has been, for it to be used on the larger iPads. But I don't think macOS is the answer either, because it's optimised for keyboard and mouse/touchpad use. It's a very different beast.

iPadOS needs to be something else. Somewhere between the two - properly suited to its form factor and in particular optimised for typing on screen without pushing most of the visual/usable display out of the way when the on screen keyboard appears.
It needs an overhaul, it needs a new desktop class OS with touch because IPadOS is still so basic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Will Co
It needs an overhaul, it needs a new desktop class OS with touch because IPadOS is still so basic.
Well it’s because Apple isn’t convinced that a tablet is an equivalent of a laptop isn’ it? Yes after all that marketing of it’s a computer or not, it all falls to the way you sell people on its usage, which in one word is “revolutionary“ and still is. It’s a device that is just different from a iPhone or a Mac in all the ways it can be utilize.
 
Sounds like further screwing over people who don't want a giant heavy tablet. The Mini gets less and less features and gets no benefits of iOS and half the features of iPadOS and gets the bottom of the barrel processor.

I will never own bigger than the Mini. My wallet has been ready for them to take the Mini seriously for a long time now.
 
I love my iPad Pro. I have the 11 inch and it’s great especially when I plug it into my monitor. I also have the keyboard case for it and I love it. However, splitting up the iPad line I think is the wrong move. The iPad Pro has such a crazy amount of power, not giving it feature just because the screen is smaller does not sound like the right way to go. Then again, Apple is will do whatever they want. I personally won’t buy a bigger iPad than what I have currently. I love the size when I am on the go and when I am at home, it plugs into a much bigger monitor and it is really an amazing device.
 
Well, it’s exciting. Hopefully Apple forgets about keyboards, windows, macOS, etc. and builds on the real iPad vision. That’s what has been successful, and not trying to create a PC-wannabe (as they’ve done with stage manager and floating windowing…).
 
And here we go again, more arguments over whether or not the iPad should run macOS or iPadOS…

As a person who uses the iPad as my primary computer (yes, I do “pro work” with it), I think the iPad should run iPadOS, and the Mac should run MacOS. But I do think that iPadOS should gain a form of Catalyst 2.0 which allows Mac apps to run on iPadOS, perhaps Catalyst 2.0 could even automatically optimize the UI of the Mac app for touch input? Kind of like some of the changes Catalyst currently makes when bringing iOS apps to macOS, only the other way. I also think that iPadOS should gain more of macOS’s functionality in a way that makes sense for it’s modular form-factor, and it’s touch-first input. I think they should largely “merge” in functionality, but remain distinct in certain aspects.
 
I’m sure every iPad they have could run this “special” iOS 17 version.

More gimmicks to introduce yet another unnecessary iPad variant.

There’s no end to the useless products they are releasing in order to keep prices going up.

Lol reading Steve Jobs’ latest book he said Apple were heading toward bankruptcy in the early 90’s because the products were only 25% different from when he left 10 years earlier and they were charging prices that were too high. Also he was confused about what products and configurations were actually in each product line because there were so many products, like 20+.

This same observation applies for todays Apple.
I can’t believe they are heading down that same road. Why can’t companies and CEOs learn from past mistakes. I see companies making the exact same mistakes all the time that other companies make on their way to irrelevancy and eventual bankruptcy. Believe me it can happen to Apple and they are headed in that direction. There is a tipping point when it comes to quality of product, innovation and price that every company can hit and once they do things go down hill fast. I think a big part of it nowadays is all CEOs see is milking companies for all the money they can and then when they leave the companies are worse off then when they got there.
 
All that processing power on the iPad Pros has seemed like overkill for a while now.

What's it for, exactly?

Here's hoping that Apple figure out a way to unleash that power for its users.

Because the current iPadOS experience sure ain't it.
I’ll tell you what Apple should make. They should make an an iPad maybe somewhere around 20 inches that runs a version of macOS and it comes with a stand like what is on the iMac. You put the iPad on the stand and it automatically connects it to external power and keyboard and mice and acts just like an iMac. Then when you want to go you just pull it off the stand and it’s an iPad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wanha
Being able to do it = the Microsoft way

Being able to do it with a great UX = the Apple way

It is a monumental challenge to design a coherent architecture and user experience for the two modes that a user might potentially switch at any time, especially if we're thinking of having iPadOS switch to MacOS when a keyboard & mouse are attached.

Perhaps we'll get there at some point, but anyone who thinks you just slap it on and call it a day lives in fairy land.
If you ask me, the MS way is better than Apple when devices have keyboard + trackpad. iPad with Magic Keyboard are very limited in multitasking and dual monitor support is very limited. Also, Windows has the benefit of a large list of applications designed for keyboard + mouse. IMO, the Apple way is not a great UX as you said. I think iPads are better tablets compared to a Surface Pro device. But as soon as you attach a keyboard + mouse, Surface Pro is a better device.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Kal Madda
I’ll tell you what Apple should make. They should make an an iPad maybe somewhere around 20 inches that runs a version of macOS and it comes with a stand like what is on the iMac. You put the iPad on the stand and it automatically connects it to external power and keyboard and mice and acts just like an iMac. Then when you want to go you just pull it off the stand and it’s an iPad.

Yes then it’s a monster 20” tablet that needs to get back on the stand asap because you won’t want to carry it around at that size, just like you don’t carry your 20” iMac around often.
 
Yes then it’s a monster 20” tablet that needs to get back on the stand asap because you won’t want to carry it around at that size, just like you don’t carry your 20” iMac around often.
Yea maybe that’s a little big. Maybe 16 inch. The idea is that it would switch from a desktop to an iPad with all the benefits of portability when you use it as an iPad and all the benefits of a laptop when it’s connected to its stand.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.