~
display panels are display panels, the panel doesn't care if its a tv or computer monitor
The panel doesn’t care, but the designer of the panel does. There are panels designed for television, and panels designed for computers. TVs are designed for viewing from multiple distances, computer displays are designed for close viewing and reading from a single distance. TVs are built for bright, vibrant color, computer displays are built to control brightness and color accuracy. Not to mention depth and greyscale. My knowledge is a bit out of date, so maybe this difference is less pronounced in OLED designs, I don’t know, but historically your statement is inaccurate.
4k is the current standard resolution, which makes 5k super niche, which is why there are so few 5k displays and why higher refresh rate 5k panels are super unlikely to ever appear
Two years ago I wouldn’t have argued with this, though I would have lamented it. But somebody (BOE?) other than LG is building 5K displays these days, and LG itself is diving headfirst into 6K. TVs won’t go there, but computer displays already have.
ProMotion (120Hz) is important to Apple’s video-editing customers, so it will come, even if Apple has to do it themselves. The question is, will the industry follow? You could be right that the answer is no, because 5K (and 6K, which is not the true 6400x3600 that a “6K” UHD television standard would require) is not happening for televisions. They are going directly from 4K to 8K, but not anytime soon.
But I think it’s possible console makers could still get on board. I mean, the PS5 Pro already supports 8K at 60Hz, right? So if 5K displays become more common outside of the universe, then existing hardware could support them. Not to mention PS6, which I know nothing about, but if it’s another collaboration with AMD, then 5K support is not going to be an engineering problem.
Regardless, ProMotion isn’t coming to the Studio Display, which uses standard LG panels. We can agree on that!