"Within the program, Apple reviews its partners' apps and makes suggestions on their work."
"can you make that work with 1GB ram?"
The iPad was a fun little novelty on introduction, but the fact is Apple's answer to the tablet form is pretty much a dead cause by now, and the retina MacBook is virtually what we all want the iPad to be. At least, in terms of getting **** done.
Much as the large screen of the iPad transformed the iPhone, so a 13" iPad would transform it again.
Even something as simple as reading PDFs would be so much better with a 13" screen. And there are endless scenarios in which having a laptop-size screen that one can carry around will trump a laptop. Weight is the important thing. I think Apple need to keep the weight to 1.5 pounds, the weight of the first iPad, if possible. And if they could reduce or eliminate the bezels, it could be not much bigger than the current iPad.
What's the point of having a tablet if you don't use it as a tablet?Here's an idea Apple.... add bluetooth mouse support. Touch sucks for productivity!
Agreed!!Ultimately it's the limiting OS that runs the iPad that's holding it back, nothing an app will do to fix that
because then you need to carry TWO devices ALL the time. The tablet is fully capable for word processing, spreadsheets, power point.... but have you ever tried doing more than viewing one? You definitely give it the finger.... but not to add text.What's the point of having a tablet if you don't use it as a tablet?
That's why we have Bluetooth keyboards. I'm just not getting the mouse thing. You have a fully touch enabled device but aren't using the touch functionality. A stylus is more prominent for this issue.because then you need to carry TWO devices ALL the time. The tablet is fully capable for word processing, spreadsheets, power point.... but have you ever tried doing more than viewing one? You definitely give it the finger.... but not to add text.
Having a bigger screen is a no-brainer. What really would help is to have multiple user abilities in the OS. Not having that ability is unbelievable. Well they are catching up to Same-Sung with split screen/multi tasking (about time), so multiple users shouldn't be available for another year? Come on Apple, don't hate that the competition had it first, if you want productivity and businesses to come on board, just catch up to the rest of the tablet world.
Ok, so out of the MILLIONS of businesses that DON’T/WON’T buy/run iPads what would suggest it is? Without a survey I don’t reckon he/she is too far from the truth.Right because you've surveyed businesses and that's what they've told you. Obviously IBM doesn't think so and apparently neither do the 40 businesses Apple is working with in this story.
truth. enterprise customers arent going to be impressed by multiracial emojis and shaving .2mm off the case size. neither will they care for a ridiculous update and refresh cycle. try telling a Fortune 500 they have to retrain their entire staff because Apple completely changed the UI elements. eventually they'll tire and go to somebody who doesnt pull the rug out from under them every 18 months.
Judging by how furiously they seem to apply for these, ‘see what sticks and what we can keep to ourselves’ filings, Apple probably have patents for wiping my arse.The irony is, Apple has patents dating back a few years related to multiuser logins - well before Android supported it. I was so sure Apple was going to support it when they included Touch ID on iPad but I guess that's not a priority for them.
Use a laptop. Problem solved... since the 90s.get rid of iOS... problem solved.
just wait till you get a surprise...soonYes, let's get all 80,000 people working on it and stop the rest of the business.
Here's the F'in Idiot's Guide to Writing Comments: "Before you do anything else... Blah...blah...blah.."
u are a good person. i always take care of my apple products...it's just that...for some reason..after upgrades after upgrades...it just burns out...I had to give my to my mom after she vandalized hers with make up and all the creams she wears. I had to be a nice daughter and gave her one of the two I had but with such pity for it. Mine looks brand new, I take care of stuff.
Yeah, Wacom keeps getting closer, and perhaps their next model won't sound like a helicopter or start your desk on fire. Superior digitizer experience though. ...but as a whole, they're a ways out yet. Even Microsoft's Surface team doesn't seem to have the engineering resources apple does, because the Surface 3s, for their obvious utilitarian strengths, are still crude and clunky compared to an iPad. ...even those cheap knockoff iPads on ebay exude more quality. The first company that makes a tablet with the utility of a full OS & Passive Digitizer, with the build quality of an iPad, will win.wacom, anyone?
I thought the iPad was always intended to be a consumption device, not a production tool.
The new Apple is now trying to manipulate square pegs into round holes for the sake of moving units, not the intended experience.
I've never understood why Apple thought that was a good decision. Everything in iOS is just too damn plain. I have button shapes turned on, which helps somewhat, but everything is still far too boring. Tons of black and white, the UI widgets are all boring and uninspired, etc."Well, we noticed it's a bit too easy to discern between text boxes and buttons in your app, so you have your work cut out for you."