Not once did they ever do any of those.Right? I miss the days when apple simply released the first personal computers, first digital music players, first smart phone, first tablet, first wireless earphones, first VR headset, etc...
Catch-up to who? The way I see it is they could be ahead. Meta for instance relies on a smartphone for their glasses. But Meta do not make a phone. Apple does.Apple plays catch-up. Again.
In 2040Looking forward to Apple showing the industry how this is done properly.
Ah yes, that was a beautiful parallel universe, wasn't it?Right? I miss the days when apple simply released the first personal computers, first digital music players, first smart phone, first tablet, first wireless earphones, first VR headset, etc...
To the posters responding to this: he was being sarcastic- making the point that Apple has very rarely been “first”.Right? I miss the days when apple simply released the first personal computers, first digital music players, first smart phone, first tablet, first wireless earphones, first VR headset, etc...
Nothing in this list makes the product immediately valuable as all of the features are fulfilled by another Apple product already. I don't immediately see where this product fits other than an iphone replacement over the long term.
- Take photos
- Record video
- Play audio, including podcasts, music, and audiobooks
- Offer directions
- Answer questions
- Describe your surroundings
- Identify plants, animals, landmarks and more with Visual Intelligence
- Make phone calls
- Send messages
- Translate languages
Ok, I kinda agree, but…I have the 2nd gen Metas, and the camera is instantly available and offers your-eyeball-POV, which is great. That said, the camera does not permit zooming or framing, and the pixel count, while acceptable, is inferior compared to the iPhone. The other really nice feature are the speakers, which allow me to listen to podcasts without something stuck in or over my ears. The sound quality is not great for music, however, and I wish the volume was a bit louder, but the listening experience is completely transparent, so I’m less likely to get runover by a vehicle.I honestly think that as long as these glasses will not have a GUI, they will be pointless. I dont need glasses to look up whats in front of me and take pictures, as long as I still need to carry my iPhone with me.
Hmm if I’m barreling down the motorway/highway & the glasses gave out a red/ blue glow indicating a ‘Smokey’ (speed trap) ahead that would be a great feature!Nothing in this list makes the product immediately valuable as all of the features are fulfilled by another Apple product already. I don't immediately see where this product fits other than an iphone replacement over the long term.
On the other hand, if the frame of the glasses could subtly tint red when there was a perceived danger in a specific direction I wouldn't be able to leave the house without this product. It seems to be well placed for reading signals from surroundings, run AI and provide feedback. That's the type of new use case their old products can't fulfill. An extension to my human senses. Airpods for audio. Glasses for vision. That's in line with building a bicycle for the mind.