and they will still get paid off ads. this doesn't stop advertisements. it helps to stop unwarranted tracking.
No, app prices return to their natural state again: $.99 or $1.99 per app. IAPs may decline in some cases.Less revenue for iOS developers, less incentive to develop iOS applications?
Targeting the ones who spend as little as possibile looks like a sound strategy.
It was not free, it was paid with our data. Maybe you don’t care but I do and I haven’t been asked by those developers.I noticed a few apps have less features in the free versions since 14.5. So we have to buy the paid version to get what was previously free?
I noticed a few apps have less features in the free versions since 14.5. So we have to buy the paid version to get what was previously free?
On iOS the default is to allow apps to ask to track (although there is some variance, as the default for some users seems to be not to allow that). Each app has to ask, then, and you either allow or deny.Correct me if I am wrong, but this feature will be off by default on Android (compared to on by default on iOS)? So the fallout on android may be way less if people cannot be bothered to switch it on.
On iOS the default is to allow apps to ask to track (although there is some variance, as the default for some users seems to be not to allow that). Each app has to ask, then, and you either allow or deny.
I don’t know, and I don’t know if it’s publicly known how the Android mechanism will work.
Mine was turned on, and so was my colleague's. It's unclear to me, from Apple documentation, what the default is supposed to be. It seems that a default off would be almost the same as just denying always without options, since no normal person is going to do dig into settings and find this. I think it should be on by default, keeping it in line with all other permissions which also ask before use. But it seems to vary. I wonder why and how.Hmm, mine was turned off by default. Meaning that apps could not even ask me for permission to track me. It’s disabled by default, and will stay that way until I literally flip the switch.
That's a pretty arrogant view. How do you know if they were tricked and how do you determine, on behalf of other people, what value they think it has? Personally, I have allowed app tracking for my (state) weather app, so far. Only a few other apps asked, for which I disallowed it.That still some 30%+ of users have somehow been tricked into sharing their data is worrying and in need of a campaign to educate them on what they are giving away for little or no return.
Absolutely. Look at Safari AA icon in the search bar under Privacy Report of blocked trackers. Will tell you what tracking ads were blocked. MacRumors at the top of my list for websites. For the tracker apps, Google wins hands down.Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't MacRumors make money this way.
Why would I even consider advertising on MacRumors if I know it's going to waste. And if you didn't know, MacRumors makes money by advertising
Signed by an Android user 😂
Exactly. It's to keep an app from peeking at what other stuff we're into.and they will still get paid off ads. this doesn't stop advertisements. it helps to stop unwarranted tracking.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't MacRumors make money this way.
Why would I even consider advertising on MacRumors if I know it's going to waste. And if you didn't know, MacRumors makes money by advertising
Signed by an Android user 😂
Developers think its all about them…. Make a good app and people will pay for it.I am more likely to pay for apps if they do not track me.
One of the big disappointments has been the developers who want both to charge and to gain from advertising and/ or tracking.
The model of offering an advertising-supported "free" version and a paid-for option is fine. But leave the tracking and unexpected advertising out of it.
Good news is less revenue for developers, if they feel there is less incentive to develop iOS apps , by all means please stop making your crappy iOS apps With in app purchasesLess revenue for iOS developers, less incentive to develop iOS applications?
No one wants to be trackedThat's a pretty arrogant view. How do you know if they were tricked and how do you determine, on behalf of other people, what value they think it has? Personally, I have allowed app tracking for my (state) weather app, so far. Only a few other apps asked, for which I disallowed if developers or websites aren't making money, time to close shop
Uh, how do you figure? The ads I've been getting on Instagram since ads on Instagram unfortunately became a thing aren't small businesses. They're uniformly either huge businesses or scammers.NOT a fan of Facebook, but both of their complaints in that last paragraph are Spot On !
And why wouldn't a normal person want to turn stop tracking on.Mine was turned on, and so was my colleague's. It's unclear to me, from Apple documentation, what the default is supposed to be. It seems that a default off would be almost the same as just denying always without options, since no normal person is going to do dig into settings and find this. I think it should be on by default, keeping it in line with all other permissions which also ask before use. But it seems to vary. I wonder why and how.
Solution: use a good VPN like Proton. Hides your location - applications and web pages seem to think I am in Miami - and Proton filters out all ads and trackers if you want.This is just going to be temporary because because Google is adding basically the same feature to Android. There are other basic tracking measures out there that are becoming the new normal way of tracking users and that will be the way forward for the time being.
Personally I have noticed a lot more location based ads lately and ads that seem to fit more with the type of app that I am using ;at the time.