Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I hate to say it, but that shade of military green is going to bug me compared to the half-neon-half-pastel-green of the iMessage bubbles. :eek:
 
This will be cool!

I'm always wondering what those other people on the train are texting, surfing, etc.

Now I will know :D
 
re original article

1) i'm for perfecting the speech systems - keys is - as long as we understand eachother clearly

2) i'm for upping the ram to 1G

3) 8meg cam is alright as long as the sensor has good low light capabilities
 
Are you ****** kidding me!? I won't be able to use voice to text with my regular iPhone 4?

Man, I was just waiting for the killer feature that would only be able to work on iPhone 5 to crop up, but I didn't think it would be this. Dang it.

This was my point on the first page. This isn't fact guys. This is a round-up of the rumours that 9to5 put together. Now MR has taken a part of that and has made it sound like a "report" or a preview and so now we have a bunch of people on this forum complaining and swearing.

IS THIS ALL? I WANTED MORE!!!!

But thanks for all the douche bag comments and so forth. I firmly believe that it is MR's responsibility to make it clear that this is a RUMOUR, not a preview so that people don't start frothing unnecessarily.
 
This is the kind of cool stuff that is very sketchy for us international users... Not sure if we will even get the feature. Maybe we will have to speak in English? If not, maybe the voice recoginition for European languages will be horrible? It's very hard to tell, and we usually don't get clarity in these matters until we hold the phones in our hands. :S
 
Why would this require an A5 and 1GB of memory? Nuance's speech services are almost completely driven through their servers. Yes there will be some code that has to run locally, but the heavy lifting is all done remotely. Demo Dragon Go or Siri to see how Nuance's technology works.

If Apple or anyone else can provide a legitimate reason for requiring this be limited to A5, I'll probably accepted it (being too much of a fanboy) but Apple will get a ton of bad press over it. Unless the really explain the limitations, there is going to be a lot of people howling that the limitation is artificial and meant only to force upgrades. Same as what happened when iOS 4 turned iPhone 3G's into steaming piles of sludge immediately after upgrading.

That is Apple's M.O. Every year iterate a couple hardware features (better camera, better connectivity) and a couple software features that "can't" be ran on previous gen devices. See: MMS, the original voice control, tethering, even for god's sakes wallpaper on the 3G. Jailbreaking has proven these features are perfectly functional with existing hardware.
 
This was my point on the first page. This isn't fact guys. This is a round-up of the rumours that 9to5 put together. Now MR has taken a part of that and has made it sound like a "report" or a preview and so now we have a bunch of people on this forum complaining and swearing.

IS THIS ALL? I WANTED MORE!!!!

But thanks for all the douche bag comments and so forth. I firmly believe that it is MR's responsibility to make it clear that this is a RUMOUR, not a preview so that people don't start frothing unnecessarily.
I would think that the site's name being 'MacRumors' would be clear enough.
 
All reminds me of the Knowledge Navigator

Hopefully they will improve the Macs speech recognition too, I still can't get the damn thing to tell me a knock knock joke!
 
Last edited:
Dual-core with 1GB of ram is standard for a smartphone now days. :D

I would agree when using Android, Windows, etc. As for Apple products, I think their Hardware/Software combo are far more efficient then the other devices so 1Gb and Dual-core will smoke the others on performance. Just my thoughts.
 
I have no interest in voice interaction whatsoever. I have it in my car and never use it. It's a PITA more than anything.
 
I'm not really that interested in having a conversation with my phone. Seems more of a novelty feature to me.
I agree. While a "cool" feature, as I wrote above, I don't think I'll use it often. Surely not to annoy my collegaues at work, or to sound like a weirdo at whichever public transit at least. :D While walking down the street? Yeah, maybe if I want to get looks while giving my commands. ;)

At home, in the evening, darkness lit up by my TV screen... Speaking to my phone? That sounds a bit creepy and weird too, but one of few situations where it could be useful. :D
 
This could be big.

I might be a lone voice here - but this could be big.

Big as in - quite a major change in what people expect personal computers to do.

Big as in - replacing internet search as the first port-of-call for many actions.

Big as in - causing a sea change in data-based web services so that they integrate properly with assistants.

Big as in - Apple investing some cash to make this service better. Specifically Apple needs its own data oriented search-engine.


Looking at you Wolfram.

C.
 
If this turns out to be true, it is a bit curious that Siri ran just fine on the iPhone 4 and below, yet will require the new processor and more RAM to execute similar functions going forward. I have a feeling that this will be one of the first things the jailbreak community will get to work on.
 
If this is Apple's key selling point/upgrade "must" - then for me, personally - it fails as I don't have much of a desire to use the feature. And I have a few apps that do dictation and have the ability to search/email/text which (on the RARE occasion I use them) work fine.

I'm hoping/would think that Apple has more up its sleeve to make the next upgrade more interesting...

I, for one, look forward to this feature. I drive a lot and we have hands-free legislation so voice-control of this nature is really going to help me work while I commute.
 
If it is true, it had better work worlds better than the current version as "Call Troy" can end up calling Joy or Roy, 5/10 times.

Oh yes! When I ask my phone to call the "work office" it dials "sushi kings", even when I'm sober... :confused: When I ask it to call "sushi kings" it dials the number to my parents, and they don't even like fish. :confused:
 
I might be a lone voice here - but this could be big.

Big as in - quite a major change in what people expect personal computers to do.

Big as in - replacing internet search as the first port-of-call for many actions.

Big as in - causing a sea change in data-based web services so that they integrate properly with assistants.

Big as in - Apple investing some cash to make this service better. Specifically Apple needs its own data oriented search-engine.


Looking at you Wolfram.

C.

And how can change that a simple voice to text command recognition system?
 
More memory, faster processor and better screen is always nice. I don't think there's much in the way of physical changes now that can make a huge impact. The biggest new(er) hardware feature on the iPhone 4 was the front facing camera which for developers/apple was a game changer within the product line.

NFC would be just about the only other "major" hardware change that would open up more doors...
 
I might be a lone voice here - but this could be big.

Big as in - quite a major change in what people expect personal computers to do.

Big as in - replacing internet search as the first port-of-call for many actions.

Big as in - causing a sea change in data-based web services so that they integrate properly with assistants.

Big as in - Apple investing some cash to make this service better. Specifically Apple needs its own data oriented search-engine.


Looking at you Wolfram.

C.

Yeah I imagine it could be huge if it works as near flawlessly as we would like to imagine. As many languages that exist, and even dialects or accents within one language, that is a monumental achievement that from everything I have read does not exist yet. I am prepared to be wowed by Apple. But if actual usage causes one to repeat self frequently or give up in frustration, than I won't count it as a feature worth upgrading specifically for.
 
This was my point on the first page. This isn't fact guys. This is a round-up of the rumours that 9to5 put together. Now MR has taken a part of that and has made it sound like a "report" or a preview and so now we have a bunch of people on this forum complaining and swearing.

IS THIS ALL? I WANTED MORE!!!!

But thanks for all the douche bag comments and so forth. I firmly believe that it is MR's responsibility to make it clear that this is a RUMOUR, not a preview so that people don't start frothing unnecessarily.

Get over it.

I would imagine this will be the big feature/selling point for the new phone. Nothing really special, something interesting nonetheless
 
I, for one, look forward to this feature. I drive a lot and we have hands-free legislation so voice-control of this nature is really going to help me work while I commute.

I am sure you're very safe when you multitask while driving. However this exact use case you illustrate is exactly why I'm more against it. There are enough issues with people not paying enough attention to the roads and causing accidents. Sometimes it's better to unitask...
 
Get over it.

I would imagine this will be the big feature/selling point for the new phone. Nothing really special, something interesting nonetheless

I don't think you have read what I said. I didn't offer an opinion on the contents of the rumour and whether it's enough of an update. :confused:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.