I only recently started using the voice command option for the iPod app. I tend to find that I am arguing with it more than getting what I want... Me: "Play Song X" iOS: "I'm sorry, you must have FaceTime enabled to make calls" Me: "No! Play Song X" iOS: "I'm sorry the genius isn't available" ugh!
I can only hope that this new system will work better... I do really love the idea of being able to voice control my device... especially when driving.
Boy, I can't wait to hear all the people on the subway asking "Where can I buy milk?" into an iP5. Dumbing down of people is always sad
A lot of long-distance trains here have silent cars ... where no mobile phone usage is allowed ... it will be quite nice when all of the cars on all of the trains go this route.
Link to quiet areas: http://www.bahn.com/i/view/GBR/en/trains/overview/mobile-area.shtml
Therefore, I'm quite sad to see voice recognition being built into iOS, as it goes against this trend.
HAHAHAHA u made me laugh !!!!!I only recently started using the voice command option for the iPod app. I tend to find that I am arguing with it more than getting what I want... Me: "Play Song X" iOS: "I'm sorry, you must have FaceTime enabled to make calls" Me: "No! Play Song X" iOS: "I'm sorry the genius isn't available" ugh!
I can only hope that this new system will work better... I do really love the idea of being able to voice control my device... especially when driving.
I totally agree with you here. And to be honest, I would feel rather screwed if Apple made the Assistant feature iPhone 5 exclusive.Why would this require an A5 and 1GB of memory? Nuance's speech services are almost completely driven through their servers. Yes there will be some code that has to run locally, but the heavy lifting is all done remotely. Demo Dragon Go or Siri to see how Nuance's technology works.
If Apple or anyone else can provide a legitimate reason for requiring this be limited to A5, I'll probably accepted it (being too much of a fanboy) but Apple will get a ton of bad press over it. Unless the really explain the limitations, there is going to be a lot of people howling that the limitation is artificial and meant only to force upgrades. Same as what happened when iOS 4 turned iPhone 3G's into steaming piles of sludge immediately after upgrading.
Nuance is ok but not essential....Give me a faster processor, better battery life and a 4" screen and I'm happy...
Agreed. I think that like Facetime this feature will look a whole lot better in demo and commercials than seeing someone actually use.
Dual-core with 1GB of ram is standard for a smartphone now days.![]()
Oh yes! When I ask my phone to call the "work office" it dials "sushi kings", even when I'm sober...When I ask it to call "sushi kings" it dials the number to my parents, and they don't even like fish.
![]()
I like the idea too. The part I don't like is that location based reminders requires location services to be active almost constantly. That will have a huge impact on battery life. I am going to guess it will not be GPS but wifi location for this feature in order to reduce battery drain, but it will still be a drain.And I very much like the idea of gps-triggered reminders, that's cool.
iPhone 3G got iOS4, but was missing some features. iPhone 4 getting iOS5 implies nothing.I can't really see this being an iphone 4s/5 feature.
It's already clear that the 4 will get IOS5 - FACT
Apple have made it clear that IOS 5 will have ;
VoiceOver action support
Option to speak text selection
VoiceOver item chooser
I can't see them making these iphone4s/5 exclusive otherwise they would have saved them for the iphone announcement rather than announcing it in the IOS5 keynote.
I had an Android phone for work and the voice recognition was worse than worthless. My old Windows mobile 6 phone would at least confirm if it picked the right name. The ***** Android would just dial whatever name it thought you said
That's the current setup, but what if they could do it in the phone itself? Not possible? Perhaps not, but I don't think a hybrid system is out of the question.Why would this require an A5 and 1GB of memory? Nuance's speech services are almost completely driven through their servers.
Why would this require an A5 and 1GB of memory? ...
If Apple or anyone else can provide a legitimate reason for requiring this be limited to A5, I'll probably accepted it ....
... See: MMS, the original voice control, tethering, even for god's sakes wallpaper on the 3G. Jailbreaking has proven these features are perfectly functional with existing hardware.
If this is a legitimate example, the problem is that "play song" is not a feature of the iPod app voice control.Me: "Play Song X" iOS: "I'm sorry, you must have FaceTime enabled to make calls" Me: "No! Play Song X" iOS: "I'm sorry the genius isn't available" ugh!
Boy, I can't wait to hear all the people on the subway asking "Where can I buy milk?" into an iP5. Dumbing down of people is always sad
A lot of long-distance trains here have silent cars ... where no mobile phone usage is allowed ... it will be quite nice when all of the cars on all of the trains go this route.
Link to quiet areas: http://www.bahn.com/i/view/GBR/en/trains/overview/mobile-area.shtml
Therefore, I'm quite sad to see voice recognition being built into iOS, as it goes against this trend.