That would really stretch the term laptop.macbook 12'
The basis to call somethings Apple created that didn't sell in large numbers as failures is questionable. The $9,995 1983 Lisa with a five-megabyte hard drive was the precursor to the 1984 Macintosh. Yes it was expensive, but if you look at that first 128k Mac for $2499, it was just representative of how expensive computers back then were to design/sell comparatively. Look at the price of the Xerox Star workstation was $16,595 in 1981 in which the Lisa was derived from. Businesses were the main buyers of this technology.Released in 1983, Lisa officially stood for "Local Integrated Software Architecture," but was actually a backronym invented later to fit the name of Steve Jobs' daughter, Lisa. Apple positioned it as a business computer and an alternative to the Apple II. While previous computers relied on text-based interfaces and keyboard input, Lisa was the first personal computer to feature a graphical UI and mouse, interface innovations both first seen in action by Jobs during a visit to Xerox Parc's research lab in Silicon Valley.
Despite this, starting at just shy of ten grand (around $29,905 by today's standards), the Lisa was prohibitively expensive for all but the wealthiest of households, and the computer was a flop. By 1986, Apple had only managed to sell around 100,000 units, and the entire Lisa platform was discontinued. Apple was even forced to dispose of some 2,700 Lisas in a landfill in Utah. Fewer than 100 Lisa computers are believed to exist today.
Why under Tim Cook? Under Tim Cook, they more affordable versions of their products in almost all categories, something that didn’t happen under Jobs. If anything, it’s more likelyI doubt it. Not many people out there are willing to pay $3000 for a Niche product. Unless Apple lowers the price to $999 then yeah maybe. But under Tim Cook that’s not likely to happen.
Yes, they are but it comes in stages. Nowadays Apple likes to push out expensive products first before they can introduce a cost-efficient product. For example, iPhone 14 Plus was launched after iPhone 14 Pro models were out in the wild. Now Apple might be planning on discontinuing the SE models. Half of the stuff we used to get when purchasing an iPhone is gone meanwhile the prices have remained the same or gone up higher.Why under Tim Cook? Under Tim Cook, they more affordable versions of their products in almost all categories, something that didn’t happen under Jobs. If anything, it’s more likely
Can we just acknowledge that 100,000 people bought a $30,000 computer?Despite this, starting at just shy of ten grand (around $29,905 by today's standards), the Lisa was prohibitively expensive for all but the wealthiest of households, and the computer was a flop. By 1986, Apple had only managed to sell around 100,000 units, and the entire Lisa platform was discontinued. Apple was even forced to dispose of some 2,700 Lisas in a landfill in Utah. Fewer than 100 Lisa computers are believed to exist today.
Apple will do it right, everyone else rushed to the market, Apple studies and design to work with the iOS ecosystem which is the advantage most other platform do not haveYep. Along with loads of other comments here about AR.
I’m also adding Mac Pro Wheels to the list respectively.
There’s no way they are a success at $699.00 without tax. You can’t buy them
Individually either. That’s just wrong.
Car wheels are less expensive than that. Doesn’t stand a chance! 🤨
View attachment 2142075
While Apple clearly has a history of exorbitant prices, I would point to the iPhone Pro models (which should just be the regular iPhone models), the $1,200 M2 MacBook Air with 8/256 RAM/storage, Apple’s soldered RAM and SSD upgrade prices, the $6,000 Max Pro, the $2,500 16” MacBook Pro with 512GB of soldered storage, and the $600-700 Mac Pro wheels as characteristic Tim Cook.Why under Tim Cook? Under Tim Cook, they more affordable versions of their products in almost all categories, something that didn’t happen under Jobs. If anything, it’s more likely
I still use mine for non iPod things
You’re telling me that cost-cutting, bottom-line focused enterprise customers can justify $700 wheels? I couldn’t even get my last job to buy a $329 iPad for the lab — all I got was some cheap Android tablet.Disagree, for the market in which these sell (enterprise) this is normal pricing for mundane ****. The Mac Pro was and is made for enterprise purposes, not for consumers.
Noted- Curious to know.Disagree, for the market in which these sell (enterprise) this is normal pricing for mundane ****. The Mac Pro was and is made for enterprise (for profit) purposes, not for consumers. Which is a very different market with very different pricing.
Spot-on. And Apple has been collaborating with Stanford University's AR/VR laboratory for seven years.Apple will do it right, everyone else rushed to the market, Apple studies and design to work with the iOS ecosystem which is the advantage most other platform do not have
Disagree, for the market in which these sell (enterprise) this is normal pricing for mundane ****. The Mac Pro was and is made for enterprise (for profit) purposes, not for consumers. Which is a very different market with very different pricing.
You’re telling me that cost-cutting, bottom-line focused enterprise customers can justify $700 wheels?
I couldn’t even get my last job to buy a $329 iPad for the lab — all I got was some cheap Android tablet.