Bud Tribble. Awesome Name.
Sorry, but it is.
Max Power is better (Simpsons)
Bud Tribble. Awesome Name.
Sorry, but it is.
Never heard of that guy before, on reading the title I thought - what’s a Bud Triddle?
Hopefully they begin to encrypt all iCloud information with the key on your device so that no one can access even iCloud backups etc too.
The trouble with Tribble is that Jim isn't too keen on the idea.
Edit: damn, someone already beat me to the reference.
Oh ok. Should apply to everyone. It will be pretty much meaningless because even when the government makes laws that apply to everyone, nothing applies to the agencies who work in shadows.This should apply to the NSA Et al. , and I guarantee any legislation will not apply to the government in any meaningful way. This is just for show.
All his life people would be talking about Star Trek. All his life.Just beam them to the Klingon ship, where they’ll be... no Tribble at all!
*laughter, credits roll*
Bud is the smartest guy in the room. Any room. Apple is lucky to still have him around.
[doublepost=1537903782][/doublepost]
iCloud file storage is de-duped just like DropBox and all the other cloud storage providers, to save lots of cash. This means that even though the data is encrypted at rest, they are able to fingerprint "known bad" files from other sources and rat you out to anyone with a subpoena in a cryptographically provable fashion.
We buy Apple products and they have no rights to collect my Analytic data from iphone,Watch & icloud in order to improve their services - if they want analytic data i think it is fair that Apple should pay for it- basically you are paying for uploading data not apple
![]()
Yup.
You can shut off all analytics & data sharing.
They "pay" you for it by providing great services to you which require such information to create.
It is big for Apple to do this. One of their key competitive advantages is their stance on privacy and how that informs every aspect of what they do. It is better for the long-term survival of our union to have privacy listed as a fundamental human right, but in some ways it weakens their position in the market. If Google was held to the same standard as Apple when it comes to privacy, I'd be more inclined to use Google's software and services. Would I actually end up using them? Maybe not, but for me privacy and security are the #1 top concern, followed by design and use of use.
Max Power is better (Simpsons)![]()
one day siri will read your mind that might supprise you big time....
It's a defect, details have been hidden to protect the guilty.Is your avatar that world's smallest smiley face that I remember seeing in the news at some point?
It sounds like GDPR, which also sounds reasonable if you present it well but sucks in reality.This seems like an exceptionally good idea. The list of points seem quite reasonable, and hard to argue against it being a good idea.
Not sure why this needs to be in PRSI. Someone will probably be along shortly to prove the need.
I wouldn't say "always," but when it comes to privacy-related things, yes. If Google comes out against this, I'll know it's legit. If they support it too, then we better believe it's a trap.Anything that makes Google squirm is always good.