Now Adobe would be a good buy.
Although I can't help feeling that:
Photoshop for Mac: $250
Photoshop for Windows: $2500
Ala Shake.
GIMP $0
Not as good, but nearly.
Now Adobe would be a good buy.
Although I can't help feeling that:
Photoshop for Mac: $250
Photoshop for Windows: $2500
Ala Shake.
If Apple bought Adobe with 20% premium, they would still have about 14 billion dollars left over... Just saying.
EA & Twitter?
Who in God's name thinks either of those are even remotely possible?
Get serious, what does Apple stand to gain from acquiring twitter? And since when is Apple a game developer? AND since when was EA up for sale anyow??!?!?!
PSSHAW I SAY! PSSHAW!!!
How retarded are these predictors exactly??
Apple now has nearly $29 billion in cash reserves which has generated ongoing speculation about what Apple could or should do with that money.
Oppenheimer is wise. It's prudent to save money "for a rainy day," especially in these uncertain times. For a corporation the size of Apple, $29 billion really isn't all that much. And you can't say they aren't investing in R&D. That's what keeps them ahead of the curve (not the Blackberry).
Twitter? I don't think Apple would go for that. I can't see how it would be lucrative for them. However, if someone offers Twitter $700mil they should take it - the company has lasted a long time without a business model and they should sell before that bites them in the ass.
As Bill Gates said to Homer Simpson: "Oh, I didn't get rich by writing a lot of checks."In all seriousness, move the Apple factories to Germany! Use TI FireWire chipsets! IPS panels! Samsung SSDs! Seagate hard drives!![]()
EA games for a new upcoming Apple TV (exclusives) and not to mention for the iPhone and iPod Touch, and Twitter can be for the social networking aspect that could be worked into it as well. Then it could eventually be added to the entire ecosystem connecting the iPhone, iPod Touch, and Apple TV.
Seems plausible to me... Whatever they are doing in Cupertino, it is going to be big.![]()
(Honestly, what does Twitter really accomplish that's very unique or interesting? I can post "status" updates on a Facebook account and browse what my "friends" have said on a Facebook client on my mobile phone or computer. Why duplicate that with ANOTHER client? I don't use MySpace, but pretty sure it has comparable capabilities too, as does LinkedIn.)
Adobe would be the sensible purchase, then dump Photoshop for PC to increase your Mac sales![]()
Maybe they should buy a subset of Adobe's products instead of the whole company. Then they could make up a brand name to sell them under. How 'bout... "Macromedia"?I say acquire Adobe.
1: It doesn't matter if EA wants to sell itself, it's a publicly owned company right? So anyone with the cash like Apple can buy it regardless what they want.
2: Apple developed and launched the Pippin games console but it flunked:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Bandai_Pippin
And personally I think it will be the WORST thing ever if Apple buy EA, don't care about twitter but not EA. The games industry is just fine as it is, Apple should make a better and more desirable AppleTV, NOT a games console or get into games development.
God, with all this talk about Google and Apple sharing directors and now that Apple wants to buy these company's they ARE starting to look just as monopolising as Microsoft and the they will suffer the same fines too.
Apple has already told the European courts to get stuffed after it ruled them to charge less for it's iTunes in Europe!! Perhaps they feel their now arrogant enough to be above any laws?
According to sources (Leo Laporte) 60% of people who join twitter stop using the service after 30 days. Personally, I don't get it...
EA games for a new upcoming Apple TV (exclusives) and not to mention for the iPhone and iPod Touch, and Twitter can be for the social networking aspect that could be worked into it as well. Then it could eventually be added to the entire ecosystem connecting the iPhone, iPod Touch, and Apple TV.
Seems plausible to me... Whatever they are doing in Cupertino, it is going to be big.![]()
No one wanted YouTube to be huge? YouTube was huge when acquired by Google, and YouTube already had some way of gaining revenue through ads. I think the only people that didn't want it to be huge were the media outlets. Twitter doesn't have ads, or registration that requires paying. I can't see how they're making money.
Not to mention that YouTube has some entertainment value that attracts viewership. Would you want to see a six minute YouTube clip of Christian Bale spouting off his worthless 'effen mouth has he berates a FELLOW employee or would you rather read a tweet from a cameraman on the set who has only 140 characters to spout what's happening. What about a car chase on the LA freeway? Video or text? What about a outbreak at the courthouse? Video or text? What about cops beating someone? Video or text?
I rest my case.
Twitter some say is a fad. That I cannot answer, other than to say, I do not tweet, I do not receive tweets and I do not follow tweets of others. Only time will tell.