I still think the analysts haven’t twigged it’s going to run iPadOS.
They can make it thicker just to make it more rugged to cope with kids.They could make the cheap MacBook thicker solely for product segmentation reasons, to make the more expensive Air more desirable compared to the entry level model.
You didn’t answer the question. WHY do you think the iPad should run macOS? Don’t just say “why not”, there is a specific reason as to why you think it should. What is the technical reason you’re referring to?why shouldnt it?
yes apple controls the keys, but there is no technical reason or hurdle for why it couldnt. im certain apple has builds that run on it internally.
Not at all, a lot of people here are under the impression that: chip = product, and that is simply not the case. The chips have a ton of overlap across different products.what -doesnt- make it the same as any other a18 based platform? the form factor?
its a reasonable parallel. but you seem so hung up on some other point that no one is disputing.
iPads run iPadOS, this is a MacBook. Why on earth would it run iPadOS? That makes zero sense and there’s zero things about this that would lead someone to think that.I still think the analysts haven’t twigged it’s going to run iPadOS.
While a lot of people would love that I suspect it's going to be near identical if not identical to the existing Air. Tim Cook is a supply chain crazy, the reason this is likely coming out is to capitalise on education and use up some old A series chips.Just bring back the 12-inch MacBook. Intel was the main bottleneck. That same form factor would fly with Apple Silicon.
While a lot of people would love that I suspect it's going to be near identical if not identical to the existing Air. Tim Cook is a supply chain crazy, the reason this is likely coming out is to capitalise on education and use up some old A series chips.
I would not be surprised if they just throw these into the existing air chassis to cut down on cost.
Why not buy old PCs then?If LibreOffice runs on it along with the above then I'm good. The real work happens on the Linux box anyway. I need storage and connections more than CPU power. Both of those are hard to fit into a laptop in any case.
That would only mean 1, maybe 2, more OS releases for the M1 MBA?If system software support for the macbook will last at least 6 years, is there any reason not to support m1 macs for the same timescale?
This comment is completely missing the mark. Context is very important and you just removed all of it. The form factor wasn’t a flop, everyone absolutely loved the form factor, it was everything else about it that made it fail. The 12” MacBook was a flop because it was more expensive than the MacBook Air at the time and the MacBook Air had better specs, so it was extremely hard to justify. Plus the intel chip that was inside of it was horrible and it would overheat like crazy. Also the world hadn’t adapted to USB C yet. Literally all of those issues would be resolved today with Apple Silicon and it could be extremely cheap, all of the R&D is done. But the point is, people absolutely loved the design, it’s still to this day the most satisfying laptop to hold. People wanted to be able to use it but unfortunately it was doomed from the start.It’s simpler than that. It won’t be 12-inch because that form factor was a flop. That size was only designed to compete with netbooks and that era is long gone. People want big displays and touchpads these days.
This is same as how some people hoped the next iPhone SE would be based on the iPhone mini. Why would Apple take a flop and build a new product around it?
Never ever.Materials and color: strong matte plastic
I was wondering if they might put the cheap £300 iPad in a £100 keyboard case, price it at £600, and say - “there’s your budget MacBook”.I still think the analysts haven’t twigged it’s going to run iPadOS.
Of course the iPad Pro/Air can run Mac OS, but iPad OS was designed for this form factor and preferred by most people and keeps getting better.why shouldnt it?
yes apple controls the keys, but there is no technical reason or hurdle for why it couldnt. im certain apple has builds that run on it internally.
So you know that for sure? How? There are no 12" laptops on the market, so there's no way to know. The MacBook was definitely not a flop because of its form factor; it was due to flaws such as the weak Intel processors and the keyboard.People want big displays and touchpads these days.
I had actually 2 Macbooks 12 inch. They so compact, that with a Macbook 12 inch in the bag you'd think you left one at home - it was that much mobile, slim and light. While everybody hates butterfly keyboards, I have had not a single problem with them. CPU was a bit weak (don't mention GPU) and it was the main reason of failure IMHO along with the high price. This time Apple corrects or is going to correct both mistakes so I'd expect it to sell reasonably well. It was slow and expensive though very compact, generally Apple's Vaio and it failed due to similar reasons as Vaio did.This comment is completely missing the mark. Context is very important and you just removed all of it. The form factor wasn’t a flop, everyone absolutely loved the form factor, it was everything else about it that made it fail. The 12” MacBook was a flop because it was more expensive than the MacBook Air at the time and the MacBook Air had better specs, so it was extremely hard to justify. Plus the intel chip that was inside of it was horrible and it would overheat like crazy. Also the world hadn’t adapted to USB C yet. Literally all of those issues would be resolved today with Apple Silicon and it could be extremely cheap, all of the R&D is done. But the point is, people absolutely loved the design, it’s still to this day the most satisfying laptop to hold. People wanted to be able to use it but unfortunately it was doomed from the start.
Also netbooks died off many years prior to the 12” MacBook, so it had nothing to do with that market. Apple was just innovating and making something as thin as they could, but it was ahead of its time. But time has now caught up and honestly it would be a perfect time to bring it back, but as much as I would love for that to happen I’m not expecting it to. I think it has a better chance reusing the chassis from the M1 MacBook Air, which would be super disappointing. The 12” MacBook would be perfect.
Craig Federighi clearly stated at WWDC that there will be no MacOS on the iPad.course the iPad Pro/Air can run Mac OS, but iPad OS was designed for this form factor and preferred by most people and keeps getting better.
Yeah I still have my 2017 12” MacBook, I bought it cheap used many years later, but same with me, the butterfly keyboard has given me zero problems. I absolutely love this laptop and would love to have a modern version of macOS on it, especially with something as powerful as the A18 Pro inside.I had actually 2 Macbooks 12 inch. They so compact, that with a Macbook 12 inch in the bag you'd think you left one home - it was that much mobile, slim and light. While everybody hates butterfly keyboards, I have had not a single problem with them. CPU was a bit weak (don't mention GPU) and it was the main reason of failure IMHO along with the high price. This time Apple corrects or is going to correct both mistakes so I'd expect it to sell reasonably well. It was slow and expensive though very compact, generally Apple's Vaio.
I can’t wait to see how they backtrack on ‘there will be no touch in Macs’ if those rumours are correct. (Maybe this will be the first touchscreen Mac? Probably not at $699…)Craig Federighi clearly stated at WWDC that there will be no MacOS on the iPad.
I broke four butterfly keyboards in MBP 2017s in three weeks, the E key always went first. That’s how I ended up with a hackintoshed Lenovo, I just couldn’t keep replacing MBPs every 5-6 days.Yeah I still have my 2017 12” MacBook, I bought it cheap used many years later, but same with me, the butterfly keyboard has given me zero problems. I absolutely love this laptop and would love to have a modern version of macOS on it, especially with something as powerful as the A18 Pro inside.
MacOS on iPads would certainly hurt MacBook sales. Touch on the MacBook, however, would in no way hurt iPad sales.can’t wait to see how they backtrack on ‘there will be no touch in Macs’ if those rumours are correct. (Maybe this will be the first touchscreen Mac?