This Is good news that they are trying this out on the non pro models first that way all the kinks are worked out for those of us who purchase the pro max or ultra or whatever they are gonna call it
No its not, its really not that good, have you seen a MicroLED screen. It will never be as good as OLED unless you can get a 1:1 ratio of zones to pixels.hopefully Apple will push this forward to the whole industry
micro-Led is just next gen level and it will be with us for decades to come
these threads always fascinate me because everyone is so against Apple’s plans lol.No its not, its really not that good, have you seen a MicroLED screen. It will never be as good as OLED unless you can get a 1:1 ratio of zones to pixels.
Imagine OLED but even brighter and without burn-in risk. That’s MicroLED.I’ll always be excited for display improvements. It’s hard to imagine visuals getting better than OLED though.
I don’t think you’ve seen a MicroLED screen because you’re describing mini-LED.No it’s not, it’s really not that good, have you seen a MicroLED screen. It will never be as good as OLED unless you can get a 1:1 ratio of zones to pixels.
OLEDs are already at 2000 nits brightness (iPhone 14 Pro, Apple Watch Ultra), and I don’t worry about burn-in on my Apple OLED screens, though I do worry about it on my LG OLED tv.Imagine OLED but even brighter and without burn-in risk. That’s MicroLED.
ReferenceOLEDs are already at 2000 nits brightness (iPhone 14 Pro, Apple Watch Ultra), and I don’t worry about burn-in on my Apple OLED screens, though I do worry about it on my LG OLED tv
For the iPhone 14 Pro Max, its OLED can only reach the claimed 2,000 nits when the screen has 25% or fewer of its pixels lit up, or when the average luminance of the entire screen is below 500 nits.
It turns out that Apple was being modest with its 2,000-nit claim, as I've measured the display to actually be able to output 2,200 nits for a 10% window or up to 2,300 nits for a 1% window. Of course, a tiny 1% window of white isn't a realistic scenario for any type of content, which is the condition many other phone makers use to market their screen's peak brightness. I'm happy to see Apple reporting real-world metrics for its screen. Next year, we will no doubt see other companies advertise 2,300 nits peak brightness for this same generation of OLED
I think MicroLED makes more sense in a product like a Monitor/iMac/MacBook/watch and maybe an iPad/pro if they are kept on all day with a static image. That is not the case with the iPhone.OLEDs are already at 2000 nits brightness (iPhone 14 Pro, Apple Watch Ultra), and I don’t worry about burn-in on my Apple OLED screens, though I do worry about it on my LG OLED tv.
Obviously, having no worry about burn-in is an advantage of microLED, along with thinner and lighter displays, but those are more infrastructure differences than visual differences. That’s why I said that it’s hard to imagine visuals getting much better than OLED already is. Trust me, I want any improvements to displays we can get, it’s just hard to imagine anything better than what OLED already produces since I haven’t seen it yet.
SeeSpeaking of burn in i still have no idea how my parents 2014 imac (27) got burn in images on the screen, it was the docking where mail, safari etc are located. If that can happen on a led screen im sure it can happen on an OLED, still no idea how it happened. Maybe they put it on constant on by mistake?
When you leave an image such as a login window on an IPS display for a long period of time, you might temporarily see a faint remnant of the image even after a new image replaces it. This is called "persistence," "image retention," or "ghosting." It's normal behavior for an IPS display, and the faint image will disappear over time.
True for permanent displays, but for phones, the lifespan matters less nowadays when the lithium battery and the advancement of tech ends these devices' effective use within 5 years.It's more about consistency and longevity than out of the box image quality... The O in OLED stands for organic... organic compounds are generally (but not always) less stable than inorganic compounds... They usually have shorter lifespans with wider variability and are more difficult to "tame" than inorganic materials.
Any display, though, where temperature and self-illumination vary from pixel to pixel will be, almost by definition more difficult to stabilise their luminosity over time compared with displays that use blanket illumination and passive pixels (typical blanket lit LCD panels).
Micro LED illuminated panels themselves will also likely suffer from back light variability, since LEDs (though to a lesser extent than their Organic counterparts) also get dimmer as they age. So I expect that Micro LED panels will also suffer burn in over time.
It is very real promises - but manufacturing small enough high-output LEDs has been a big challenge. Thats why you see gigantic, low volume units for ridiculous prices (e.g. a 110" Samsung TV at $150k).at this point, micro LED is all hype. Nobody is currently using it in anything. It’s all just dubious promises currently
OLEDs are already at 2000 nits brightness (iPhone 14 Pro, Apple Watch Ultra), and I don’t worry about burn-in on my Apple OLED screens, though I do worry about it on my LG OLED tv.
Visually microLED will probably be similar to OLED. Both are types of display where each pixel is an LED emitter and there is no separate backlight and filter. MicroLED does have potential to be brighter and be less susceptible to burn-in as it uses silicon instead of a more fragile organic dye of OLED to generate the light.Will anyone realistically notice the difference from OLED??
I’ve left my iPhone 13 Pro max and 14 pro max on all night on a same image due to me falling asleep while on the phone. Not one burn in for me. Never.That sucks. I wonder if thats considered part of the OLED characteristics or its covered under a warranty.
I guess Ill be waiting to upgrade till its microLED since I usually keep my phone for at least 3 years.
That sucks. I’ve had both iPhone 13 Pro Max and not one burn in. Now I got the 14 pro max, I have the alway on feature on, and fell asleep through the night multiple times with the phone on stuck on an image and no burn in. Glad it hasn’t happen to me.This is what burn-in looks like when I show it on top of a full screen white background.
Some apps have burned their icons into the display. The iOS menu bar items and task switcher also are burned in.
This isn't Apple's fault. It's just what OLED does if your display is on a lot after more than 2 years.
The AOD being much dimmer than normal means it is pushing less power into the pixels and this less prone to burn-in.That sucks. I’ve had both iPhone 13 Pro Max and not one burn in. Now I got the 14 pro max, I have the alway on feature on, and fell asleep through the night multiple times with the phone on stuck on an image and no burn in. Glad it hasn’t happen to me.
I never researched a bit of Micro LED, but one thing I'm sure is it will face the same issue of power consumption.Whenever Apple gets the tech for this working and production scaling at the price they need, it'll be great and be the end of the big downside of OLED panels (burn in). So glad Apple is pushing it forward.
Guessing rollout will be gradual into products though as they keep refining it and reducing its costs. Going to be a long time before its in the base iPhone just guessing.
Why would your screen be on and on the Home Screen enough to burn in? I only ever saw burn in on a friends old android phone where she’ll fell asleep with it touching her skin and the phone screen stayed on all night long. Burn in doesn’t happen in normal use cases
Really? Could you elaborate on what the burn in is. I've never heard that on an iPhone before.
How in the world did you get screen burn-in on an OLED display on an iPhone? That’s rare.