OnStar and other companies have spun it successfully before, I wouldn't put it past Apple (sadly).I know Apple has made some hard sells. $1000 monitor stand, etc. But I don't think even they could tout lives saved for two years and follow it up with "and now: $99 per year, and we think you're gonna love it."
I could see them saying something like "free with AppleCare+" or "included with Apple One" but I really hope not.
Will be really interesting to see how Apple handles this one.
https://www.lightreading.com/satellite/globalstar-hints-at-life-after-iphone/d/d-id/784774#:~:text=They pointed out that Apple,in wholesale capacity service revenues.
This article seems to indicate that Apple is paying around $88 million a year for the messaging service.
Yes, a life-saver, literally. What's happening in Maui is heartbreaking. I was fortunate enough to visit Lahaina some years back, and it's crushing that it will never be the same again.That's pretty freaking amazing.
Something similar is already on offer in a motorcycle airbag vest:Imagine a car had additional (non-mandatory) airbags, but they would only engage during an accident, if the buyer has unlocked them for an extra fee. It would be different, if those airbags would only be built into the more expensive cars, but once they are in a car, they should work. That is the analogy to the iPhone, which could rescue its owner, but does not.
Not sure how the laws are in the US, but even as a private citizen you have to rescue someone if you know he is in danger and the rescue will not put yourself in danger.
Not sure about the EU, but in the US you need a cell phone and service to even call 911. 911 maybe "free" but, getting to use it requires you to spend money on the phone service.So Apple still wants to charge money for that service? Imagine the PR disaster, if someone is not rescued, because he did not have a subscription. Emergency calls have traditionally always been free in all networks. Do it would be very unfortunate if the iPhone could technically reach the satellite, but will rather let the iPhone owner die, because he did not buy a subscription. That could even be illegal in the EU.
So Apple still wants to charge money for that service? Imagine the PR disaster, if someone is not rescued, because he did not have a subscription. Emergency calls have traditionally always been free in all networks. Do it would be very unfortunate if the iPhone could technically reach the satellite, but will rather let the iPhone owner die, because he did not buy a subscription. That could even be illegal in the EU.
Why so negative — did they give you a price plan already? I have a feeling that they will keep this free after the 2 years are up.
I don’t think you can text, but you can send location via satellite from find my to any contact. Not sure why they appear to have omitted including a reason for having sent the location… even 20 ASCII characters would be better than nothing.They could always bake the price into a hidden price increase somewhere else and keep it “free” forever.
I have several members that we couldn’t locate for quite awhile yesterday with the phone lines down, thankfully they were north of Lahaina before the fires started. I don’t think any of them have iPhone 14’s, might be time to upgrade. I can’t remember if you can use it to text a family member to let them know you’re safe? Or is it for 911 calls only?
911 in the US works on any cell phone that is powered on and able to connect to a cell phone tower. No SIM card required. If you take the card out of a phone it will show “emergency call only.” To hint towards this.Not sure about the EU, but in the US you need a cell phone and service to even call 911. 911 maybe "free" but, getting to use it requires you to spend money on the phone service.
If they didn’t want to open up the obvious moral question of is it correct to let someone die unable to contact help due to not paying a fee, they probably shouldn’t have pursued this technology. I don’t think anyone can make a good faith argument here that it is “right” under any situation to allow this to happen. If it takes the government taking over this system to make it be available on all phones with the hardware for free, then it should happen, and fast.I'm not certain people understand how these services work. The operator answering those messages is not a government official (like 911). That is most likely a private answering service with paid staff. They were communicating with the 911 service in the area. But that private business that is monitoring the gps messages and communicating with local officials is most likely being paid by Apple.
I can only speak for Germany. Here you can call the emergency services with any cellphone without even having a SIM card. Phones without a SIM card even display "Only emergency calls".Not sure about the EU, but in the US you need a cell phone and service to even call 911. 911 maybe "free" but, getting to use it requires you to spend money on the phone service.
Then the government should take the service off their hands and operate it on taxpayer money. Simple. I don’t see why you see this as a gotcha, this is no different than “forcing” AT&T to connect emergency calls on phones with no service while the government handles the rest. Garmin sells plenty of watches and car GPS units, they will live. I don’t think it has ever been right to do this, but it is even worse to do it on an everyday device.So, Garmin should go out of business for being amoral *******s? Again, I simply don't understand this attitude. Again, these services aren't provided by government agencies like 911. This is an infrastructure and staffing issue that is built and paid for by private companies. Does the EU have Satellite messaging services that it offers to citizens for free? No? Then why should any private company build, maintain, and staff this service for free?
Unfortunately in the USA you'll find a significant number of people who don't want the government dictating that mobile phone operators should spend extra money (passed onto the customer) for a service such as that.I can only speak for Germany. Here you can call the emergency services with any cellphone without even having a SIM card. Phones without a SIM card even display "Only emergency calls".
If you tried to pitch free 911 calls today, some people would be against it. That does not mean it is right.Unfortunately in the USA you'll find a significant number of people who don't want the government dictating that mobile phone operators should spend extra money (passed onto the customer) for a service such as that.
This same logic would apply to emergency satellite calling.
Apple has never offered to pay for this, nor is it expected. If you call 911, AT&T or Verizon or TMobile doesn’t pay for your rescue, police, ambulance, etc, they just send the call along to the goverment. The US already does search and rescue within its borders if you manage to get a call through or you’re missing long enough. This argument is absurd.Actually, I'm certain government agencies are dreading the flooding of this service into unprepared locales. Because it will significantly up the number of SOS messages requiring search and rescue, even for minor issues. And those operations are expensive.
Again, Garmin offered me (and I bought) insurance for helicopter rescue services, including in foreign countries. Who should pay for that? Apple? You bought an iPhone, you're in the middle of the Amazon, and you get lost. Should Apple pay for the rescue mission?
I just don't think many of you have actually thought this through very well.
Such a foreign concept for sure, if only we had a blueprint for it that had been in operation for decades… I wonder if it could be called by typing 3 numbers into any cell phone… 733? 822? Can’t quite recall…Nothing about that is simple.
Apple may very well decide to do this. But I'm not sure I understand why Apple MUST give this away for free, according to many of you.
My guess is eventually, they'll sell upgrade services, like insurance to pay for helicopter rescues in remote areas. Those services were all available when I subscribed to the Garmin service.
If making this a paid subscription means that the satellite network is improved and eventually provides more and better services, then wouldn't that be a good thing?
Apple may very well decide to do this. But I'm not sure I understand why Apple MUST give this away for free, according to many of you.
My guess is eventually, they'll sell upgrade services, like insurance to pay for helicopter rescues in remote areas. Those services were all available when I subscribed to the Garmin service.
If making this a paid subscription means that the satellite network is improved and eventually provides more and better services, then wouldn't that be a good thing?
Not true in US. You do not need a cell plan to call 911. Any old phone can call 911 even without a cell service provider.Not sure about the EU, but in the US you need a cell phone and service to even call 911. 911 maybe "free" but, getting to use it requires you to spend money on the phone service.
They may very well be working on a way to make this free. But, SAT phone service isn't cheap. Even though this is just text based messaging. Someone is going to want to get paid for it.
Actually, I'm certain government agencies are dreading the flooding of this service into unprepared locales. Because it will significantly up the number of SOS messages requiring search and rescue, even for minor issues. And those operations are expensive.
Again, Garmin offered me (and I bought) insurance for helicopter rescue services, including in foreign countries. Who should pay for that? Apple? You bought an iPhone, you're in the middle of the Amazon, and you get lost. Should Apple pay for the rescue mission?
I just don't think many of you have actually thought this through very well.
The situation for emergency terrestrial calls in the US is the same, I have heard of no significant number of people not wanting it.Unfortunately in the USA you'll find a significant number of people who don't want the government dictating that mobile phone operators should spend extra money (passed onto the customer) for a service such as that.
This same logic would apply to emergency satellite calling.
Right now this exists on one model of iPhone. If Apple gives this service, for free, to every iPhone user, the costs for this service are going to rise dramatically in 5-10 years.
But imagine the PR nightmare? Apple gave you a free service to send SOS messages, but there's no system in place to actually rescue people for free? According to your and other's logic, the same PR nightmare would still exist.
Cell phone towers are not owned by the government. I have no idea what you’re even talking about here. Apple is only employing a middleman to receive the satellite communications and forward them to emergency services, with cooperation between Apple and the goverment they could get these messages sent directly to emergency services. If the US has to pay the owners of the satellites for these communications they should, just like they have an agreement with the cell phone providers for calls on their towers. I am not expecting a Tim Cook task force to fly out on a helicopter and make sure I have a good morning.Look, I'd likely support an expansion of government services to include this service. But that doesn't exist yet. And until it does, somebody has to pay for the service.
You're talking about an infrastructure that is already built out by government agencies. Government agencies haven't built out a satellite messaging service. 911 exists because private companies charged money for phone service and are able to cover the costs of the 911 service. But it took private companies charging money for phone service to be able to get the 911 system operational, and then additional money by governments to build and staff emergency services.
It would be a ridiculous outrage because again, nobody seriously gripes that your carrier doesn’t pay for your rescue if you manage to call for help within their cell service range. In fact, this could happen right now under the 2 year free period for iPhone 14 owners. Apple isn’t paying for their rescue, that is between the person needing rescue and the people who rescued them. All they do is connect you to rescuers.But imagine the PR nightmare? Apple gave you a free service to send SOS messages, but there's no system in place to actually rescue people for free? According to your and other's logic, the same PR nightmare would still exist.