It is almost a certainty. Then after several years they will add bezels back, increasingly big year after year, as a feature, like they're doing with buttons now.So, does that mean we will keep tapping the edge of screen all the time?
Agree. No one actually caresWhy is Macrumors so focused on bezel-free phones?
It's something new... some people upgrade based on aesthetics.Why is Macrumors so focused on bezel-free phones?
Hehe, I think the obsession belongs to those earning a living by guessing what Apple is obsessed with.Not sure why Apple has an obsession with shaving a 1/4mm of bezel off the iPhone every year.
Not a gimmick at all. It offers massive immersion and aesthetic.
The camera control is a gimmick. A full screen phone is not a gimmick. It makes the phone look a million times better and the screen pulls the user in even more due to the maximized immersion.
Many current cases already leave the entire screen exposed next to a protruding edge, but if/when the time comes, case makers will find a way to sell you a rugged case that works.How would a no-bezel design work with cases?
Service industry here, and we need the Otter cases.
While not all iPhones are used with a case, many (probably the majority) are. From what I’ve observed, many cases require use of a small lip over the edges of the phone to stay on securely. The point is, a portion of that space that you say will not be sensitive is also covered by cases, so expanding the screen to the very edge of the device is a waste for many users anyway.Anyone with any intelligence knows that the screen is strictly for immersion on the extreme edge.
You shut off touch sensitivity for the entire 1/8” of border. It is strictly for immersion. There would be zero ‘accidental touches’ because it does not register touch at all.
Whether zero-bezel makes a phone look better is a highly subjective determination, and even without a case, most people hold their phones while using them, typically overlapping some of the edge and effectively killing whatever added “immersion” you think is there.Not a gimmick at all. It offers massive immersion and aesthetic.
The camera control is a gimmick. A full screen phone is not a gimmick. It makes the phone look a million times better and the screen pulls the user in even more due to the maximized immersion.
Agree. No one actually cares
This was basically the vision for iPhone from the very start:
Jony believed the iPhone would be all about the screen. In their earliest discussions, the designers agreed that nothing should detract from the screen, which Jony likened to an “infinity pool,” those high-end swimming pools with an invisible edge.
[...]
“Some of our early discussions about the iPhone centered on this idea of… this infinity pool, this pond, where the display would sort of magically appear.”
All true, but I still don't want it. I value a case and the protection it offers over zero-bezel.Not a gimmick at all. It offers massive immersion and aesthetic.
The camera control is a gimmick. A full screen phone is not a gimmick. It makes the phone look a million times better and the screen pulls the user in even more due to the maximized immersion.
In case you haven't noticed, most new iPhone "innovations" lately are just gimmicks.So the edge of the screen remains unresponsive? Then it's just a gimmick, and not needed.
Not a gimmick at all. It offers massive immersion and aesthetic.
The camera control is a gimmick. A full screen phone is not a gimmick. It makes the phone look a million times better and the screen pulls the user in even more due to the maximized immersion.
You can't see something that will never exist.A bezel-free mini - I see you.