Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
An iPad Mini and iPhone Fold are very different beasts. One is wildly expensive and will have a subpar display while the other will be affordable and be well suited for usage with an Apple Pencil.
If Apple makes a book-style foldable that doesn't support the Apple Pencil, that is just sad on their part.
 
Ultimately the price will determine how succesful a foldable iPhone will be.

A real disruption in the foldable market, securing mass adoption, would be something like 'last year's regular specs, but foldable, and priced like the current regular'. 🔥

Personally, I am not interested in buying anything more expensive than somewhere around the price of an iPhone 17 Pro. Heck, my last Pro model was the 11 Pro. Since then, I've only bought the regular models (13 and 16).
 
What a bad/confusing title. That suggests Apple's the one making the display when it's actually Samsung.

Title should be Displays for Apple's First Foldable iPhone Near Mass Production
The title isn’t confusing at all. Samsung makes parts to other companies specifications, moreover this isn’t a stock item that is shared between other manufacturers and their devices, this item will solely be in iPhones. It is right to say the display is Apple’s.
 
I’m surprised I haven’t seen anyone comment on this among the various posts, but whether I buy or not will ultimately depend on the experience I get when connecting an external display.
  • Full Screen or Black Bars?
  • Native Resolution or Device Resolution?
  • Single / Split View Apps or Multi Windowed Apps?
  • Can the unfolded inner display function as keyboard/mouse when connected?
Being able to fit a desktop-like computing device in one’s pocket would be of extremely high value to mobile/nomadic workers or those who require portability. Otherwise, it’s nothing but a large screen phone that folds? Who would that be for? Why would the average person need that?

I’d have switched to Samsung (Dex) if it wasn’t for other tradeoffs. I was optimistic and excited about the revival of the rumored 12-inch MacBook, but then disappointed once Neo was announced with the same dimensions and weight as the Air. Granted the educational market segment may be larger, but it’s been 10 years since Apple created a computing device under 1kg/2lbs. Even the lightest 11” iPad (with keyboard) weighs the same as the 13” Macbook Air.
 
It will start at $1,999 for 256 GB. A 2 TB model will bring it closer to $3k.

As someone who intends to purchase one and give it a shot, I fully expect it to flop miserably, and barely crack 2% of iPhone sales.
It’s not a mainstream product with components Apple can’t even make mainstream.

The very best products of a category don’t typically represent the most products of a category with most settling with modest and much more limited or compromised alternatives.

It’s long overdue for pocket computers to be more useful; if the 17 Pro Max can be a 1.5K slab, this fold certainly can easily sell within a sensible amount at $1.600-2000.

Prosumers who buy for their individual needs don’t need or care about mainstream sales; that’s the target audience of this device.
 
What good is ‘almost crease free’ ????
In other words it still has a crease which of course will be more visible with use
I’m disappointment after hearing it would be crease free
 
While I am eagerly looking forward to seeing the first foldable from Apple, it is disappointing that it will lack FaceID and a telephoto lens. Disappointing that when Z Fold is having some form of zoom, the iPhone will not. Don’t think it will be available in the immediate next version too. Combined with the higher price tag, I might prefer to get the Z Fold instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
What good is ‘almost crease free’ ????
In other words it still has a crease which of course will be more visible with use
I’m disappointment after hearing it would be crease free

Because you will only notice it in extreme lighting. If you can’t feel the crease it certainly won’t be noticeable in day to day usage or even know it’s there. Until it’s out all this is guess work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ke-iron
It will start at $1,999 for 256 GB. A 2 TB model will bring it closer to $3k.

As someone who intends to purchase one and give it a shot, I fully expect it to flop miserably, and barely crack 2% of iPhone sales.
Doesn’t really matter, because it’s just another option in the long line up of iPhones. At the end of the day Apple is going to profit off of it.
 
The new iPhone Fold will probably be just as impressive and well-executed as Apple Vision. But the price will likely mean it only appeals to a very engaged niche audience. Apple clearly needs to join the foldable wave, but I’m not really seeing a huge success ahead. That said, I’ve definitely been proven wrong before.

One feature that would be incredible is if Apple allowed macOS to run on the iPhone when connected to an external display with a mouse and keyboard via USB-C — essentially turning the phone into a fully functional Mac. If they released something like that on a device like the iPhone Fold, I’m sure it would attract a lot more interest. But realistically, the chances of Apple allowing that are probably very small.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: ke-iron
If Apple makes a book-style foldable that doesn't support the Apple Pencil, that is just sad on their part.
I Don’t think I’d want the Apple Pencil for this. The device is much smaller than an iPad and is ment to be hand held. The current Apple Pencil is too big for a device like this. Apple would need to design a new pencil for this device.
 
There is absolutely no need or benefit to having this product. It will NEVER be better quality than having an iPhone or an iPad separately.

This is just another 'Apple Vision Pro style' product launch.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ke-iron
There is absolutely no need or benefit to having this product. It will NEVER be better quality than having an iPhone or an iPad separately.

This is just another 'Apple Vision Pro style' product launch.
When I replace my iPhone Air with this it will benefit me the same or more. Your argument is stupid.
 
If the Samsung screen on the foldable iPhone is better than the screens on the Samsung foldables, that raises the interesting question of why.

I can see three possibilities:
1) Its design results in a higher BOM than is acceptable to Samsung for its own products.
2) Apple has developed a better technology that they won't license to Samsung to use it its own phones.
3) Neither of the above; it's simply that Samsung has chosen to make different design decisions from Apple.


A parallel example is the LG Ultrafine monitor; it used the same display panel as in the old 27" iMac, yet had inferior performance: More reflections (so it chose not to, or wasn't allowed to, use Apple's AR coating), worse color uniformity, poorer QC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
I loved the CONCEPT of the Microsoft Surface Neo. I thought if they just had a front screen on that and it opened up, it would have been perfect (sans running windows of course).
So did I. It made a lot of sense to me. I am sure since then precision manufacturing has advanced sufficiently to get the tolerances down so a gap between two (or three for an iPad-like device?) fixed screens would not be visible. The question would be cost and perhaps robustness, but the issues of a mechanical hinge must be much less daunting than the issues of bending a screen.
 
We are going to see how the screen quality would be when the product arrives. I trust Apple has calculated all possible scenarios.
I have been disappointed by every foldable model I have looked at, but Apple has a way of taking existing technology and making it work well, so perhaps you are right. I will look at what Apple offers, but I just think there are fundamental issues with foldable designs that will be unlikely to be overcome.
 
I wonder if it will be similar tech to what is shown here by Dave 2D:

I watched that video
Crease free still isn't quite crease free.
Is the crease is significant shallower than the old crease? yes. Non existant? no.

Is it good enough? imho yes.

One thing dave was clear about; is that over time the crease gets worse. I'd believe that. Wifey has a flip 4, she's had it for 3 years and while i don't have a new one to compare it against; that crease is pretty significant.
So will the crease on this "creaseless" device get worse? most likely yes.

However. Wifey stopped noticing the crease pretty much by the end of her first week.
This is no different to people complaining about the notch when it happened. Once you are used to it; you forget it's ever there. Ergo the whole issue is overblown.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.