After seeing the adapted Nintendo Switch with OLED display, is it too soon for Apple? At premium prices, they should have had better already.
Because marketing works, similar to B&W speakers.Oled is better why do you think Oled TVs are more flagship
I forgot about that too. Large, near-black scenes can show chunky splotches and gradient patterns on OLEDs.Because marketing works, similar to B&W speakers.
Have a look at the great (color) uniformity and shadow detail of OLED: https://www.avforums.com/threads/post-your-oled-uniformity-photos-and-discuss.2325857/
OLED has better off-axis performance than mini LED. However, mini LED does have much higher peak brightness and most importantly, does not suffer from permanent burn-in like OLED.The OLED display will have some benefits over the MiniLED display, but the MiniLED display will have benefits over the OLED.
MiniLED's benefits like higher brightness levels, better off-axis viewing, lower off-axis color shifting and such are better suited to the iPad Pro's general use cases so it will remain on MiniLED.
High quality CRT projection from Barco and Marquee was still around in the 2000s. The first digital projection that really wowed me was the Sony Qualia 004 which came out in 2003 if memory serves right. At $27k retail it was also cheaper than new high end Barco/Marquee models (I had a Barco back then). Good old times.What about a classic Cathode-ray tube (CRT) iPad display? A nice throwback of the 1980s/1990s technology.
Maybe that's just when it fits in with the release cycle of the next air and when the display tech is ready. Newer versions of lower end products can have various things that are better than older version of higher end products. That's not weird at all.So now the air will have a better display than the pros don’t get it
I have the same TV, and years later, there still isn't a TV that is definitively better. It's a unicorn.Hopefully I can say this without getting swarmed on like bees, but I'm tired of the whole "OLED = vastly superior, anything else = utter crap" narrative. And I own OLED displays, I've seen my friend's LG OLED in person many times. When I was looking to buy a new 4K TV two years ago, price was NOT a concern and I had narrowed my choice down to a 77" LG C8 OLED, or a 75" Sony Z9D LED. I chose the Sony Z9D and to this day the TV still amazes me, and I don't yearn for an OLED TV even though I know it gives better contrast.
Yes, they have perfect blacks. But take a look at rtings.com and see the difference in peak luminance and brightness between today's OLEDs and a good, high-quality LED TV with local dimming (Local dimming for LED is a must... if it doesn't have good local dimming, it WILL have crappy contrast). HDR movies are mastered at a minimum of 1,000 nits, the LG CX can only reach a max of about 650 nits on a small, tiny portion of its screen. As that portion gets bigger, the brightness gets even lower. OLEDS have ABL (Auto Brightness Limiter) so in large, bright scenes (think of a snowy arctic tundra, or a bright sunny desert, etc), it'll look dull and dim compared to an LED. Today's brightest LEDs can reach up to 1,800 nits. On my Z9D, I get a beautifully balanced combination of deep blacks, and bright highlights. It doesn't have to be one or the other, like some make it seem.
I'm not saying OLED sucks, quite the opposite. It's a beautiful display tech. But each display has its own pros and cons. With HDR material, LEDs will have more pop and impact. If you watch a lot of content at night with the lights off in a pitch black room, OLED will look better. In a bright living room with lots of windows, LED will have better visibility. If you game a lot (hours on end) and watch static logo TV channels, you won't have to worry about burn-in with LED. Let the people decide what's better for their needs.
If you want better (much better) then look at the Sony B-/C-series µLED. However, it's not just much better, it's also much more expensive, much more power hungry and generates much more heat that requires dedicated AC. But if you can live with that, in the end much better quality and also stackable so sizes with >10' width are not a problem.I have the same TV, and years later, there still isn't a TV that is definitively better. It's a unicorn.
What about a classic Cathode-ray tube (CRT) iPad display? A nice throwback of the 1980s/1990s technology.
Cringe. OLED is better than Mini led and it's a fact. Stop trying to rationalize Apple's choicesIn your opinion
Enjoy the wait…Until the Pentile text issue is resolved I am wary. I would rather have Micro LED.
You mean like when Apple put a better processor into the iPad Air, leaving the iPad Pro behind in the process?No way Apple gives the OLED to the iPad Air BEFORE the iPad Pro. That makes ZERO sense.
Modern OLEDs do resist burn in for dynamic contents (e.g., video games, TV series and movies), and some apps do subtle pixel shifting to resist burn in with static contents.I would take OLED over mini-Led because OLED is either outstanding or very good. Does not as any real drawbacks. Screen burning is not really an issue in 2021.
mini-Led is great 97% of the time but looks bad the other 3%.