Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Modern OLEDs do resist burn in for dynamic contents (e.g., video games, TV series and movies), and some apps do subtle pixel shifting to resist burn in with static contents.

But if you are using apps with static contents for extended period of time (e.g., development, productivity apps, or even docks or menu bar not set to hidden), the display will eventually burn as little as several months.

My friend bought a notebook with OLED and Windows start menu bar has permanently burn in after about a year of use.
Of course it does. Apple didn’t make it. I’ve yet to hear anyone complaining about burn in on their iPhones or Apple Watches. Apple doesn’t release hardware until it’s really ready. Unlike other companies that are just in it for the sale.
 
Food for thought: to get the desired quality, Sony replaced OLED with LED in their professional reference monitors used in mastering and broadcast applications.



I’ve yet to hear anyone complaining about burn in on their iPhones or Apple Watches.

Go visit the Apple support forums, plenty of watches and iPhones with burn in. However, watches and phones will show issues much later, as they’re not run 8-10 hours a day as most displays in laptops/monitors/TVs.

It’s unavoidable, non-uniform burn on OLED starts the second you turn it on (similar to plasma and CRT). It’s not noticeable right away, but the more the material is “used”, the dimmer certain areas get. It’s how the technology works, there’s no way around it. I’ve posted pictures of tube wear (CRT) somewhere in home theater section. Similar wear in brightness can be seen with OLED. It can also (including color shift) be measured over time. Can be validated with cheap equipment in the $10k to $20k range, does not have to be NIST certified equipment in the $100k+ range. This is just something one has to accept buying OLED.
 
”When adopted in the ‌iPad‌, it will bring improved brightness[...]
Just plain wrong.
Current oleds can’t get as high brightess than lcd.
I think they meant the hypothetical new ipad air in relation to the current current, which isn’t the brightest lcd around. It’s poorly worded though so I’m not sure
 
I still don’t see Apple putting a better & more expensive OLED screen in the iPad air before the iPad Pro. IPad Pros are insanely expensive now. But the line btwn the iPad Pro & the Air is blurring. There has to be a compelling enough reason to pay more for the Pro.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: souko
I still don’t see Apple putting a better & more expensive OLED screen in the iPad air before the iPad Pro. IPad Pros are insanely expensive now. But the line btwn the iPad Pro & the Air is blurring. There has to be a compelling enough reason to pay more for the Pro.
Faster processor, better cameras including depth sensors. Plus it’s called Pro. 🏋️‍♀️
 
OLED for iOS device? hmmm, doesn't this mean it will have a burn in of the GUI being the most used Apps like say Affinity or a browser like Safari?

OLED is better for visual media consumption in a dark room (I have an OLED TV in a room I can control the light levels) which compensates for the lower peak brightness of OLED compared to (Mini)LED.

In my main room with large windows and a lot of natural light, my OLED TV would struggle with viewability. In that application, I have a MiniLED TV where the higher peak and sustained brightness makes the image more visiable.

MiniLED tvs are a thing? do they have blooming effect? I am in the market of a new tv but I am so confused on which tech to pick. I would go with OLED but what is off-axis colours? I thought OLED gives better viewing angles?

Hopefully I can say this without getting swarmed on like bees, but I'm tired of the whole "OLED = vastly superior, anything else = utter crap" narrative. And I own OLED displays, I've seen my friend's LG OLED in person many times. When I was looking to buy a new 4K TV two years ago, price was NOT a concern and I had narrowed my choice down to a 77" LG C8 OLED, or a 75" Sony Z9D LED. I chose the Sony Z9D and to this day the TV still amazes me, and I don't yearn for an OLED TV even though I know it gives better contrast.

Yes, they have perfect blacks. But take a look at rtings.com and see the difference in peak luminance and brightness between today's OLEDs and a good, high-quality LED TV with local dimming (Local dimming for LED is a must... if it doesn't have good local dimming, it WILL have crappy contrast). HDR movies are mastered at a minimum of 1,000 nits, the LG CX can only reach a max of about 650 nits on a small, tiny portion of its screen. As that portion gets bigger, the brightness gets even lower. OLEDS have ABL (Auto Brightness Limiter) so in large, bright scenes (think of a snowy arctic tundra, or a bright sunny desert, etc), it'll look dull and dim compared to an LED. Today's brightest LEDs can reach up to 1,800 nits. On my Z9D, I get a beautifully balanced combination of deep blacks, and bright highlights. It doesn't have to be one or the other, like some make it seem.

I'm not saying OLED sucks, quite the opposite. It's a beautiful display tech. But each display has its own pros and cons. With HDR material, LEDs will have more pop and impact. If you watch a lot of content at night with the lights off in a pitch black room, OLED will look better. In a bright living room with lots of windows, LED will have better visibility. If you game a lot (hours on end) and watch static logo TV channels, you won't have to worry about burn-in with LED. Let the people decide what's better for their needs.

What is with the craziness about "bright" displays? Unless you are watching in your outdoor garden or in an all glass room, all screens are pretty viewable to me. In fact, most of the time I find myself using the screens at lower than 50% brightness. Even if you have big windows, during a movie watch you can just lower the curtains.
 
I think this endless story about OLED on iPad made everyone very tired, and it is not woth talking about that unless it happens.
Really.

May I say "who cares?"...
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Tagbert and SFjohn
OLED for iOS device? hmmm, doesn't this mean it will have a burn in of the GUI being the most used Apps like say Affinity or a browser like Safari?



MiniLED tvs are a thing? do they have blooming effect? I am in the market of a new tv but I am so confused on which tech to pick. I would go with OLED but what is off-axis colours? I thought OLED gives better viewing angles?



What is with the craziness about "bright" displays? Unless you are watching in your outdoor garden or in an all glass room, all screens are pretty viewable to me. In fact, most of the time I find myself using the screens at lower than 50% brightness. Even if you have big windows, during a movie watch you can just lower the curtains.
We have an LG TV that’s OLED. The quality is jaw dropping amazing beautiful. if you’ve been in a Dolby Theater it looks exactly the same. Even though it’s a 2D picture, it really has incredible depth. We can have it in a room with skylights & it’s perfectly fine during the day and it’s amazing how bright it gets. Would I use it outdoors, no. There is no better picture & value than investing in an OLED today. You will not regret the purchase of an OLED TV. All that nonsense of burnin, color shift, off access has to do with older models. Incredible strides have been made with today’s OLED TV’s. Try one out, once you see what it’s like you won’t go back to LED TV’s.
 
I mainly use my iPad to read in bed before sleep. With night mode, the light coming from the device is minimal. With OLED however, it would be far better when only the white letters emit light, and I can lower the brightness even more because of better contrast.
 
  • Disagree
  • Love
Reactions: pdoherty and SFjohn
How can OLED be better when OLED cannot do HDR properly?

And my QLED TV beats prettty much every OLED TV on the market. So I don’t understand this obsession about OLED.

What asinine statement did you just make? OLED can't do HDR properly? It's literally UHD Premium Certified and has been for years. It provides the best HDR experience available, quite literally 50x better (because they assign it a number rather than the actual infinite contrast) than the LCD spec.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: LordVic and SFjohn
In fact, most of the time I find myself using the screens at lower than 50% brightness.
You are aware that brightness actually controls the black level (low IRE) of your image and not the peak whites (high level IRE), right? So if anything, if you want to make the image brighter (raise peak white), you'd have to adjust the contrast setting. This goes way back to the analogue days.
if you’ve been in a Dolby Theater it looks exactly the same.
I'd be really careful with such claims, because your OLED TV isn't even DCI compliant and can't process cinema content. So it can't look the same. It's technically not possible.

All that nonsense of burnin, color shift, off access has to do with older models.
No, it's the same with brand new models as well. But keep telling yourself that, maybe it makes you feel better.
Why do you thing LG implemented a timer in the firmware of current models that will, when run 8 hours straight (or was it 10?) without changing the channel, void you warranty?
It's literally UHD Premium Certified and has been for years.
And what is UHD Premium certification, besides a sticker that a manufacturer pays for? Have you actually measured an OLED screen? Which one? What spectroradiometer did you use (just to make sure your wavelength is suitable for OLED and it's specific panel types)?

Just for reference, you can easily get a UHD Premium certification with the following requirements:
  • resolution min 3840x2160
  • Input must accept 10-bit and BT2020 color space (does not have to cover it 100%)
  • must be conform to SMPTE ST2084 EOTF. Min peak white of 1000cd/m^2 at 0.05 black level or 540cd/m^2 at a black level of 0.0005.
In other words, if UHD premium certificates were olympic, it's like doing high jump with the bar at 1' height.



I wish people would at least sometimes try to understand these things from a technical perspective. I've been working in image processing for decades, been a research scientist at the institute that came up with the h264 standard... so what's posted on this forum sometimes really want to make me cringe and bite my nails. :rolleyes:
 
Of course it does. Apple didn’t make it. I’ve yet to hear anyone complaining about burn in on their iPhones or Apple Watches. Apple doesn’t release hardware until it’s really ready. Unlike other companies that are just in it for the sale.
Not many people view the same static content on iPhones and Apple Watches for hours on end. Some cases like the watch faces, use pixel shifting to prevent burn in.

The only exception is navigation app, which I have seen cases of burn in among those that drive for a living.
 
We have an LG TV that’s OLED. The quality is jaw dropping amazing beautiful. if you’ve been in a Dolby Theater it looks exactly the same. Even though it’s a 2D picture, it really has incredible depth. We can have it in a room with skylights & it’s perfectly fine during the day and it’s amazing how bright it gets. Would I use it outdoors, no. There is no better picture & value than investing in an OLED today. You will not regret the purchase of an OLED TV. All that nonsense of burnin, color shift, off access has to do with older models. Incredible strides have been made with today’s OLED TV’s. Try one out, once you see what it’s like you won’t go back to LED TV’s.
Yup. I just recently picked up an LG CX, which was an upgrade from a 2013-era Panasonic ST60 Plasma — I had basically vowed to hang onto my Plasma set until I was ready to make the jump into OLED, as going from Plasma to LED would have been a downgrade in every way except for brightness.

Ten years ago, everybody was saying the same thing about Plasma TVs when it came to things like burn-in and brightness levels, but I never had a single problem with my ST60 in the eight years I owned it. In fact, it's still working great — it's been relegated to my basement rec room for the kids and other more casual viewing — but I just decided it was finally time to pull the trigger on a 4K set.

I use the LG CX in my upstairs living room, which has two large windows at about a 30° angle to the set. I have no complaints at all about brightness — it's noticeably brighter than my ST60 was, in fact. Of course the high contrast means that dark scenes don't play as well when the room is brightly-lit, but that's mostly a non-issue for daytime programming anyway.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: bandits1 and SFjohn
d293f76a-290b-4502-a4fa-feda9dc0305e

iPhone-X-Burn-in.jpg


And now someone is going to come along and claim that's because it's run all day long and that shouldn't be done. Guess what, many people work on their laptops and monitors, all day long... they usually don't do that on their phones and watches. And those using their TV to watch a movie or two every day don't do it either.
 
What asinine statement did you just make? OLED can't do HDR properly? It's literally UHD Premium Certified and has been for years. It provides the best HDR experience available, quite literally 50x better (because they assign it a number rather than the actual infinite contrast) than the LCD spec.

Really? I have never seen a OLED TV push out 2000 nits like my QLED TV.

And my QLED TV has the same black backgrounds as OLED, except it can push much much higher nits too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pdoherty
I still don’t see Apple putting a better & more expensive OLED screen in the iPad air before the iPad Pro. IPad Pros are insanely expensive now. But the line btwn the iPad Pro & the Air is blurring. There has to be a compelling enough reason to pay more for the Pro.
And this is 2 years out. plenty of time for differentiation between models in that time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crow_Servo
OLED for iOS device? hmmm, doesn't this mean it will have a burn in of the GUI being the most used Apps like say Affinity or a browser like Safari?
Been using OLED iPhones since the very first X (had 4 different ones) never any issue with burn in.
Also had few Samsung Note phones with OLED as well as a Samsung Galaxy book Windows laptop with OLED heavily used again no burn in.
LCD/LED in all forms are obsolete and once you experience a good OLED you’ll never wanna go back to dull colors and ugly grey blacks of even the best LCD.
 
So let me get this straight:
  • iPads - a mixture of mini-LED, LED, and possibly OLED, or maybe, by 2023, it will be a mixture of mini-LED and OLED, with LED having been phased out completely on all SKUs?
  • iPhone - LED (only on SE) and OLED (all other models)
  • MacBook Air/Pro - LED (on Air, possibly) and mini-LED (on Pro)
  • iMac - LED
  • Mac Pro - mini LED (on Pro Display XDR)
So, pretty confusing in terms of display tech across all product lines. Do I have this right? Do you think Apple will ever standardize the display tech to be all OLED or all mini-LED in all of their products?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.