Dansometimestheman
macrumors newbie
This will be cool. Shame they didn’t do it sooner. The Galaxy Tab S11 is submersible. But droids are trash.
Solving the problems so very few of us have.
I'm pretty certain all speakers are vibration based.Apple has reportedly designed a vibration-based speaker system
So much cynicism packed into one paragraph lol. I for one have been waiting for waterproof iPads, especially the Mini.The only reason they are doing this is to avoid the EU Regs requiring them to make the batter replaceable by the end user, if the device in question is water proof it is exempt from the regulation... So I imagine it was far cheaper for Apple to develop and make this then it was to make a user replace battery. Anyway what will be more interesting is the price increase they give it.
I'll present my weird use case- TV/Youtube in the tub!A kindle and an iPad are sort of the opposite ends of the spectrum here.
A kindle, reading outside in the sun by the pool makes total sense (with e-ink).
Until we get a submersible iMac, Apple is never getting another cent from me!!Do Mac after
So much cynicism packed into one paragraph lol. I for one have been waiting for waterproof iPads, especially the Mini.
Being water resistant is much more useful.They are only doing this to keep people from being able to easily swap out the batteries themselves which would dig into their margins and profits.
Why can’t people see that?
Wouldn’t you rather be able to easily be able to swap out your battery than this?