Stop making it sound like there are no downsides.
”Bigger screen in a smaller form factor” leaves out important details like weight, thickness, usability issues, durability issues, etc.
In order to really make a fold-able phone "work" it's going to require rethinking and redesigning the basic concept of a phone.
Right now we're in an in-between phase, where we have fold-able screens, but which are otherwise still attached to solid and separate objects. Meaning, the case and all the other parts and components like circuit board, battery, etc. Most of these would have to be printing inside the screen itself.
I could imagine a future phone actually being something like a small slender tube where you simply roll the screen out.
They can offer more than one form factor. It’s all about choice.I could totally do without a foldable iPhone. Why don’t they leave things alone for once and focus on stability instead of continually breaking stuff?
You’re speculating into what could be. With current implementations, the downsides are the only thing that matters.Who said there were no downsides? Everything has a benefit and a downside, you just have to factor in if the benefit outweighs the downsides. Personally I think foldable screens are going to be huge, the advantage of having a larger screen that folds down to fit into your pocket is just undeniable, and those issues you name will be improved upon. But certainly there is some level of acceptance of downsides, otherwise why wouldn't you just use a flip phone from 15 years ago, it's lighter, has a smaller form factor, is more usable one handed, is more durable, etc.
Will this be a poor man's Galaxy Fold? It won't be cheap though.
They can offer more than one form factor. It’s all about choice.
You’re speculating into what could be. With current implementations, the downsides are the only thing that matters.
Not at all in their current form. Foldable phones are objectively worse in pretty much every way except total screen size when unfolded...but it has a warped seam and a plastic screen cover.I don't agree, it's still a benefits versus downsides decision, just like pretty much any other decision we make. I'm not telling you to make the decision based on the future, rather I'm saying that we shouldn't shut down the foldables concept because of what it is today. Certainly your decision should be made on what is available today, but that doesn't mean you might not change your mind with future improvements. Personally I'm considering making the leap to the Samsung Fold 2 as I feel the benefits outweigh the downsides. It will be nice carrying one device instead of babysitting 2 devices.
Do you mean something like this? (Red Planet (2000))In order to really make a fold-able phone "work" it's going to require rethinking and redesigning the basic concept of a phone.
Right now we're in an in-between phase, where we have fold-able screens, but which are otherwise still attached to solid and separate objects. Meaning, the case and all the other parts and components like circuit board, battery, etc. Most of these would have to be printing inside the screen itself.
I could imagine a future phone actually being something like a small slender tube where you simply roll the screen out.
Not at all in their current form. Foldable phones are objectively worse in pretty much every way except total screen size when unfolded...but it has a warped seam and a plastic screen cover.
This is also why foldable phones have completely flopped.
Yeah I always hated those membrane type keyboards! I think you might be a tiny bit older than me as I learned to type in high school on an electric typewriter, but we still had to manually white out typos lol. That was state of the art!!
Don't worry. It will. Just like those "modular" phones and pop-up selfie cameras. Android OEMs will still make it though, merely as a technology showcase.Dear tech industry: please get this weird fad out of your system ASAP.
Because Apple is not Samsung Or Huawei. I trust Apple to not sell me a compromised device, the Apple I know offers solutions I didn’t know I need. Letting people choose is not always a good thing.Everything, and I mean everything is a compromise.
Some people want a small phone but a big screen. Let them know the risks and choose, why is that so hard to understand?
Nope, what I am saying is, I don’t want a ToasterFridge or whatever Timmy envisioned.Well, it does need to evolve over generations.
I personally don’t understand what’s not to like. IMO if you say a folding phone doesn’t need to exist, you’re saying a tablet doesn’t need to exist.
Triple the screen, if the fold screen goes on the inside and they have another on the outside.These early steps are likely to be clunky almost certainly resulting in significant compromises in order to get double the screen size in the same height and width as current phones
Then allow me to take it one step further. Choice. Some people want a Samsung or a Huawei. They want the choice to choose something that doesn't fit your needs........Because Apple is not Samsung Or Huawei. I trust Apple to not sell me a compromised device, the Apple I know offers solutions I didn’t know I need. Letting people choose is not always a good thing.
[automerge]1592373225[/automerge]
Nope, what I am saying is, I don’t want a ToasterFridge or whatever Timmy envisioned.
Making a tablet foldable was certainly my thought. Much more sensible than expanding the smaller device screen to be a tablet size and then try to shrink it down again, i.e. fold. And that would satisfy...
I can‘t care less about Samsung and Huawei users, I don’t know how to say Huawei but I know that there is a big difference between ”choice” and “bad product positioning” because customers can’t be more confused when they choose a product by one of these vendors. And I didn’t say anything about my needs, I said I trust Apple to make products that I didn’t know I need.Then allow me to take it one step further. Choice. Some people want a Samsung or a Huawei. They want the choice to choose something that doesn't fit your needs........