Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
South Korea has been progressing to become more law and fairness driven country. Yeah may be back in the 2000s there were a bit more corruptions.

But since the late 2010s a lot of anticorruption movement occurred.
Heck, Samsung's CEO was sent to jail and a President was impeached during this time.

I have more faith in South Korean Judicial system and this could be the Korean division of Apple not playing the game fairly.
The jailed CEO was released from jail by South Korea's current president because apparently South Korea can't continue as a going concern without him. So it's not exactly sunshine and democracy.
 
Since I like iPhone and cannot live without my Apple Watch I hereby declare that Apple is allowed to use any bad practice against companies whose have committed the crime to make stuff I find hideous.

Stop the witch-hunt! Free Tim!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lcgiv
A dawn raid seems a bit of an unnecessary sabre-rattling gesture - this situation is something that would be readily and publically evident to the authorities, it's not something that Apple could have attempted to cover up (which is the normal reason for dawn raids)
Preserve any evidence that is NOT readily and publically evident to the authorities. Unless it's cronyism, it's looks to be very targeted with a fear of incriminating evidence getting destroyed.

Sounds like it could be akin to Jimmy Haslam's Pilot Flying J scam - "Ohhhhhh, we didn't pay you enough in rebates? We're sorry, we'll cut you the check right away." Knowing that 90% of the people will not work out the math.
 
What I'm curious about. When Apple takes their 30% cut. Do they have to pay VAT on that? Does it reduce the developer's VAT liability?

If both are true. Then Apple would just be recouping their part of the VAT liability.

We won't know the actual answer until their records are audited and it goes to trial. If it goes to trial. If Apple didn't do anything. It'll just disappear until the next headline article.
 
If Apple could increase their prices in South Korea by 15% without it having a negative impact on sales, don't you think they'd have done that already?
They certainly will do when the situation calls for it. They didn’t do before maybe because there’s no need to do that just yet. Apple is going to recoup the lost revenue on App Store somehow anyways, unless they are forced out of South Korea.
 
Nice little display businesses you got over there Korea. It would be a shame if Apple were to suddenly start making their own.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: strongy and thasan
Apple should just pull out of South Korea if they are gonna be treated so disrespectfully there. Or just raise all the iPhone prices 20% to cover regulatory costs.
 
They certainly will do when the situation calls for it. They didn’t do before maybe because there’s no need to do that just yet. Apple is going to recoup the lost revenue on App Store somehow anyways, unless they are forced out of South Korea.
There's always a need to be selling for the highest price the market will bear when you've got shareholders to answer to
 
I knew I would face a Mr. Exact
There is always one waiting everywhere on the internet.

I am envious of them though, they must have good care free lives to be able to spend time correcting such mundane unimportant things. I wish everyone had a great life without real problems like that.
Apple should just pull out of South Korea if they are gonna be treated so disrespectfully there. Or just raise all the iPhone prices 20% to cover regulatory costs.

Which would benefit South Korean company, Samsung greatly. This move by South Korea seems kinda antitrust in itself but the government can do what it wants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strongy
So, the article states apple


systems in South Korea.

However, Foss Patents argues that Apple is acting in bad faith by making it prohibitively expensive to use alternate payment services. Apple charges a 26% commission on payments processed by other service providers, meaning that developers using a third-party payment processor in Korea would have a total cost that is about twice as high as if they used Apple's in-app purchases.
I believe Foss Patents should open a store and offer it for free. Apple is a commercial business that has the right to set the prices for using their platforms. These companies partner with Apple to access their 2 billion customers worldwide with credit or debit cards attached to their accounts. Apple provides an ever expanding platform, markets it heavily and even does the sales and support for them. Now some of these developers are getting greedy. It’s actually the reverse of food delivery services where they take 30 percent while the restaurant and the drivers do the real work.
 
South Korea has been progressing to become more law and fairness driven country. Yeah may be back in the 2000s there were a bit more corruptions.

But since the late 2010s a lot of anticorruption movement occurred.
Heck, Samsung's CEO was sent to jail and a President was impeached during this time.

I have more faith in South Korean Judicial system and this could be the Korean division of Apple not playing the game fairly.
Sure, lots of anti corruption….until the pardons are handed out.


 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.