For this thread, it partly does. The three design patents in question were a round rectangle, a flat screen, and a colorful grid of icons.
You're probably talking about that internal review document done by a different group than the smartphone group, which compared the Galaxy to the iPhone...
after the Galaxy was out.
As for documents, this internal Samsung UI design
predating the iPhone was yet another piece of prior art that I believe Apple's lawyers made sure the jury never saw:
View attachment 726894
I believe they also managed to keep this 2006 all touch Samsung phone hidden from the jury as well. It was sold in Korea an entire year before the iPhone went on sale:
View attachment 726893
The most hilarious thing that came out was that Apple's lawyers had originally included the production Samsung F700 on their list of infringing phones... until they realized that its design predated the iPhone:
View attachment 726896
The jury itself of course was also a disaster, mostly because of its foreman who made mistake after mistake, especially by telling his fellow jurors that prior art didn't matter. Everyone, including Apple, was shocked at how quickly they came back with a verdict, clearly wanting to go home for the weekend and never return.
Jurors Admit They Finished Quickly By Ignoring Prior Art & Other Key Factors
Basically, a lot of prior art was hidden from, or ignored by, a misled jury. Small wonder that after appeals and review by higher judges, much of the awards have disappeared.