"Nobody should balk at paying $29 for this after they see what is inside, though."
What has the Lightening port done for the consumer?
Allowed the devices to be smaller and lighter, brought peace...
Peace...shut up!
"Nobody should balk at paying $29 for this after they see what is inside, though."
What has the Lightening port done for the consumer?
Peter notes that based on the electronics inside and the durability of the adapter, the company may have good reason for its pricing.
Saying the headphone jack shouldn't be on the bottom is simply bizarre. It is the ONLY place one should be allowed ... logic pretty much dictates it.
Put phone in pocket, pull it out RIGHT WAY UP! No need to perform acrobatics to use the damned thing, and probably end up dropping it.
Hold phone, have cable coming towards you, not coming out the other end of the phone and looping around far more likely to get in the way. I just don't see the downside. And I don't get the lefthanded argument at all ... maybe I'm just holding it wrong?
and imagine all the whining had they gone USB3 and most macs don't have it
So do you turn your phone upside down every time you put in your pocket? When I hold my phone the headphone jack is on the bottom which when I slide it into my pocket is then on top and the cable comes straight out. Much better than previous generations.
"Nobody should balk at paying $29 for this after they see what is inside, though."
Why shouldn't they?
What has the Lightening port done for the consumer?
It's given the consumer a new connector standard that can evolve meaning that it will probably last significantly longer than the 30 pin connector that it replaces. I would not be surprised if this connector is still being used in 20 years time. The 30pin had to change it was so out if date and could not be pushed any further so may as well change it now.
http://www.talkandroid.com/119937-jelly-bean-brings-usb-audio-support-to-android-devices/
Windows has done it for ages as I'm sure OSX has also.
Your points still don't make me think that Apple had customer's best interest in mind.
last time i heard the word copious was in the movie
Lock stock and two smoking barrels.
"..copious amounts of ganja "
Just because I bought an iPhone 5 and like it overall doesn't mean I have to be happy with every aspect of it. I think it is a great phone, but at this point the Lightning connector adds complexity and cost with too few benefits. Perhaps in the future Apple will come up with something micro-USB can't do and can justify the cost, but we aren't there yet.
Grow up and let others voices their opinions.
Great link... that brings the Android dock count to 3
(I know there are more than that... but you get the idea)
Who knows the motivation behind Apple's creation of the original Dock Connector. It could have been money. I guess the $4 per unit Apple got from accessory makers added up. But let's not forget that Apple is a for-profit company anyway... they also sell $600 phones.
All you need to realize is that the Dock Connector worked... and tons of accessories were created AND purchased over the years.
Every time someone took an iPod speaker dock home... did they really complain that it was proprietary?
Probably not... they just enjoyed the multitude of accessories "Made for iPod" that they couldn't get from a competing platform. There wasn't an elegant speaker dock for my old Blackberry... but I have one for my iPhone.
And that's been my point this whole time:
Apple... proprietary... but look what all the Dock Connector could do and all the products it created
MicroUSB... standard... but doesn't do much outside of charging and data
Maybe do a thorough analysis of their chip design and engineering involved in this connector. The Lighting Connector will replace many connectors down the road. It is a masterful work of engineering.
People no longer think 5 years down the road. They want someone else to make the changes. Well, with Apple it has never worked that way, nor will it.
If people can't find $29 to get a connector they seriously need to look at their budgets. It's equates to dinner for 2 at a moderately priced chain restaurant.
Engineering moves the world. Change in this case is good. Period.
I'm fine with that adapter being $29, the issue that I have is this adapter plus 8 inches of wire is $10 more.
This site needs to be changed to MacWhine.com. Ever article these days seems to be so negative.
My link referred to Android being able to send audio over USB making the devices compatible with the millions of USB speaker systems out there.
Anyhow, nicely put. Proprietary does not always = bad. Plus, there will be reasonably priced adapters from HK on eBay within a month or two, which will stop Apple eating all the pies.
These are benefits of a smaller connector, not specifically the Lightning connector. Apple could have used micro USB and every consumer would be better off.
Let's say iFixit did do a teardown. What will theirs do better? There will still be the same connector, same chips, same board, same pins, same plastic covers, same metal cage, same ****ing everything.
OH! Maybe they won't have the cat hair in the picture!!!!! This... changes..... EVERYTHING.
"An inkling of what you're looking for, and the resources to find out what's before you?" What does that even MEAN? This was a random teardown of a new connector that no one had seen before, not a ****ing CIA analysis report of an unknown foreign weapons technology that is going to be read by the President's war cabinet. FFS.
Are you inferring my device is defective? That would suck, as it's my second (my first had wifi issues, whereas this one does not).
As an engineer, I say Apple failed.
Maybe do a thorough analysis of their chip design and engineering involved in this connector. The Lighting Connector will replace many connectors down the road. It is a masterful work of engineering.
People no longer think 5 years down the road. They want someone else to make the changes. Well, with Apple it has never worked that way, nor will it.
If people can't find $29 to get a connector they seriously need to look at their budgets. It's equates to dinner for 2 at a moderately priced chain restaurant.
Engineering moves the world. Change in this case is good. Period.
I can see why Peter at Double Helix cables whom performed this tear down thinks you get a lot for your money with this Apple cable. Because he's the rapist who sells $3,000.00 HEADPHONE CABLES! (and $2,500.00 power / line cords that are 3 feet long)
No wonder this tear down looks like it was done by a rabid wookie!
Those things look like junk, clear heat shrink tubing with your company logo on top of a cheap interconnect does not a premium product make! Peter, how do you sleep at night???
as A left handed individual who's habit is to use my left hand for one handed operation of most hand held devices, since it is my strong and dominant hand.
I can safely say after having used devices with headphones on the bottom...
BAD. BAD. BAD. BAD BAD! it sucks. it's annoying.
Precisely the reason why the EU now has a standard adapter. So that people don't have to adapt nor do they have to worry about manufacturers switching plugs on them
A few observations:
1) Mico USB would never work. Can you imagine how hard a micro-usb dock would be to use?
2) there is already a very simple "reversible" connector. The coaxial power conector is one example. the headphone jack is another. Round connectors work well. Look at the iPod "shuffle" it uses the round headphone connector as the ONLY connector. the data moves through it just fine.
Next you ask how can you get a "ton" of data through only a few wires in the headphone jack. Look at the four wires in your gigabit ethernet cable. All of the internet including streaming HD video and even "power over Ethernet" comes over that wire.
As an engineer, I say Apple failed. When I think of something I keep cost in mind. A nifty idea is not workable if the cost is way out of line from what the customer wants. Everything you design can be designed to a price
One thing in Apple's favor. Perhaps this connector will be used in other ways and in devices we have yet to see. Maybe Lightening will appear on disk drives and monitors and the next macbook. After all what is the point is "asignable pins" if you have only one device? I assume the pins get reassigned when this is used for a disk drive.
If you don't know what your looking at or what you should even be looking for, you don't publish your findings.
Where is your's???
ah yes, thats it. "halp! ive been brainwashed!" sorry dude but im an enterprise microsoft .NET developer....but even i can see and evaluate the value that this new connector offers. its smaller, more durable, reversible, and it offers all the functionality of 30 pins in a mere 8. that holds value to me. maybe it doesnt to you for whatever reason, but that doesnt mean it's brainwashing that my milage varies from yours.Apple has manipulated your thinking into the exact corner they want you in.
Regarding the touted "adaptive" feature - there is nothing to be adaptive right now. So touting a future feature which isn't beneficial right now and may never be for all we know, is a moot point.
look at the Thunderbolt...thank gosh Apple didn't abandon USB for a series of Thunderbolt ports
Why don't you just put your phone upside down in your pocket. It's actually more natural this way when answering a call or putting it away just after a call.
Putting a phone right side up in your pocket is cumbersome. I'm pretty sure this was a good reason to put the jack on the bottom. I understand your accessory complaint, but the pocket orientation issue is silly.