How much you selling that MacBook for bb. Dms are open šCancelling my Apple TV+ after the free one year. Not much decent content compared to Netflix aside from Tehran. And, offloading my MBA M1 now that I know it's just all fake hype.
How much you selling that MacBook for bb. Dms are open šCancelling my Apple TV+ after the free one year. Not much decent content compared to Netflix aside from Tehran. And, offloading my MBA M1 now that I know it's just all fake hype.
$999 is a price of base MBA but iMac has gorgeous 24" 4.5K display. Won't happen.I just bought an M1 Mac Mini, but it wonāt arrive for 2 weeks. Apple Silicon is the only really exciting thing happening in desktops or laptops at the moment. If Apple can keep the excitement for the chis going, then I expect their sales to continue to improve. I think the iMac is just a TAD too expensive and the sales may hurt on them ($999 would have been a killer price), but they could be a real hit if people are willing to spend the money.
every tech company is prospering incredibly this year
Gartner estimates that Lenovo Group (ticker: 992.Hong Kong) remained the market-share leader globally, with 25.1% of the market, and 42.3% unit growth from a year ago. HP Inc. (HPQ) had 21.4% of the market, with 34.6% unit growth, while Dell Technologies (DELL) had 16.5% market share and 12.9% unit growth. Gartner says that Apple (AAPL) had 8% market share in the quarter, with units up a gaudy 48.6%.
'wonder how linux did?
I think many, many people would gladly takena lower quality screen for a lesser price, especially considering who Apple appears to be aiming this machine towards. $1299 for a ācasualā fun machine is too much IMO. This should be priced on par with the MBA As both machines share the target audience.$999 is a price of base MBA but iMac has gorgeous 24" display. Won't happen.
I'm sure most people would. I'm just saying with 4.5K display the price wouldn't be at $999. Apple made the choice to not include 1080p screen for cheap new iMac.I think many, many people would gladly takena lower quality screen for a lesser price, especially considering who Apple appears to be aiming this machine towards. $1299 for a ācasualā fun machine is too much IMO. This should be priced on par with the MBA As both machines share the target audience.
I just bought an M1 Mac Mini, but it wonāt arrive for 2 weeks. Apple Silicon is the only really exciting thing happening in desktops or laptops at the moment. If Apple can keep the excitement for the chis going, then I expect their sales to continue to improve. I think the iMac is just a TAD too expensive and the sales may hurt on them ($999 would have been a killer price), but they could be a real hit if people are willing to spend the money.
I think many, many people would gladly takena lower quality screen for a lesser price, especially considering who Apple appears to be aiming this machine towards. $1299 for a ācasualā fun machine is too much IMO. This should be priced on par with the MBA As both machines share the target audience.
Yes I know what I want to hear at the earnings call of the worlds biggest company is the difference in price between a 512 and 1tb SSD.In addition to Mac and iPad they should add the category RAM and SSD upgrades since that is where Apple is ripping users off big time charging obscene outrageous upgrade prices.
Ahh, thank you smart person with an attitude. Now go to the Unread folder and repeat your steps. Thanks.Is select all-> mark -> mark as read too complicated for you? Takes like for presses.
It wasn't so long ago Cook was trying to kill off the Mac with all the "Who needs a computer?" nonsense, or whatever it was. I am glad someone saw some sense.
Exactly what hype?Cancelling my Apple TV+ after the free one year. Not much decent content compared to Netflix aside from Tehran. And, offloading my MBA M1 now that I know it's just all fake hype.
its fun!Tim Cook never said that. Why are you making stuff up?
I don't hate Apple, I don't even hate the iPad. Just think it's silly.Go buy a Surface and let your hatred of Apple go.
Doesn't need a rubber keyboard, just a detachable one. Touchscreens aren't particularly thick or heavy.For the love of god no. The rigid frame of a proper laptop is a large part of what makes mobile work possible. Those awful flimsy foreskin keyboards provide no support or foundation and are infuriatingly unresponsive by comparison. Not to mention the clumsy hinges. Then there is the awful thickness that comes with a touchscreen that bloats and weighs it down. Which is particularly annoying considering that the elevation portion of the laptop (screen) then outweighs the bottom (flimsy keyboard). All for what in the end?
Iām not a fan of the iPad (not despairing those that are), but laptops should stay as laptops.
I believe the division exists between laptops and tablets for good reason.
If you have filtered by "Unread", then "Select All" is not available. Takes about 30 seconds to check it out rather than just firing off a snarky reply.Is select all-> mark -> mark as read too complicated for you? Takes like for presses.
Lol. Never going to happen. My company has hundreds of iPads in use and we keep buying more. We also have lots of Macās.I hope the iPad gets killed instead. Give the Mac a touch screen and detachable keyboard, and it's done.
It wasn't so long ago Cook was trying to kill off the Mac with all the "Who needs a computer?" nonsense, or whatever it was. I am glad someone saw some sense.
On my iPhone (iOS 14.5) you have to select each message first in Unread folder, on yours you can select all automatically? Nice! What version are you on?
I agree that it's unlikely for MacBooks to get touch screens, tho. I think it's more from a usability consistency angle rather than artificial segmentation. MacBooks are Macs, which includes the Mini, iMacs and Mac Pros. Even for MacBooks, many MacBook users connects external displays. Having only the main MacBook's screen touch capability while the external monitors does not, makes for a confusing user interface experience. I think, until such times when touch screens are standards across all screens and a standard is defined to communicate the touch inputs back to the computers, touch screens in Macs would not be a possibility.It will never happen, at least not for a while. There's value (to Apple) for having different devices target different market segments. iPhone vs. iPad vs. Mac. Each attracts buyers differently. Once you blend them together, some buyers may be feeling that they are paying for something that they don't need.
Yeah, it was a guy called COVID.I am glad someone saw some sense.
I think many, many people would gladly takena lower quality screen for a lesser price, especially considering who Apple appears to be aiming this machine towards. $1299 for a ācasualā fun machine is too much IMO. This should be priced on par with the MBA As both machines share the target audience.