Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
And all those haters who said the apple display mount and the mac pro wheels cost too much, jokes on you....:D
 
Last edited:
Tim Cook: Excellent for shareholders, awful for customers.

Tim Cook is the best CEO in the world for shareholders. But for the customers who loved Apple's user-friendliness (including the most intuitive form of the GUI, which is skeuomorphism) and innovation under Steve Jobs, Tim Cook is horrible.
When your company sells products to consumers the only way to be excellent for shareholders is to be excellent for customers. No constantly growing customer sales, no constantly growing stock value.
 
Wish I bought Apple stock when Gil Amelio was CEO in the mid-90's. I was fresh out of school and didn't know anything about the stock market then, nor did I have any money to invest. But if I remember right, it was down to $16/share. Now stock has split, and it's at $4xx/share? Where's my time machine?

It's a lot more than that, because you're forgetting all the stock splits on the way. There was a 7 for 1 a while back, and at least one 2:1 as well... Those $16 shares are a heap more now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
I bought those 5 Apple shares like I promised myself.

hopefully not over the $460 mark when the split occurs soon. You’d still get 10 shares for the same value ~ depending on if a slight dip occurs during trading hours when it occurs.

I’ll be buying 4 initially then dollar cost averaging over the next 30 days maybe 10x the amount.
 
Can some one please logically explain to me how does a company takes 43 years of innovation and advancement and product inventions to reach $1T in value, then it doubles its value in 1 year during a world wide economic recession?
I would like to add this company is considered a "luxury" brand company and not a necessity.
The first trillion required many doublings. The second trillion required just one.
 
Can some one please logically explain to me how does a company takes 43 years of innovation and advancement and product inventions to reach $1T in value, then it doubles its value in 1 year during a world wide economic recession?
I would like to add this company is considered a "luxury" brand company and not a necessity.

At a basic level, if you're looking at "fundamentals" it's because of this:

1597867585715.png

The growth isn't linear. As a company becomes more profitable, it's able to invest into more things and grow in more directions at once-- so you'd expect superlinear growth. If you assume ROI is constant for all profit levels, then you'd expect exponential growth, but it's really hard to maintain that kind of ROI. For small businesses, there are market forces that buffet you, when a company gets as big as Apple it's hard to keep that level of efficiency and to find markets big enough to grow into.

That chart isn't a smooth curve for a lot of macro-economic reasons though too. Recessions, trade wars, pandemics, all affect a company's fortunes. Right now, we're in a recession, but tech is outperforming for two big reasons: they can continue operations because their workers can work from home in a way that other industries can't, and demand for hardware and services from companies like Apple has remained strong over the past few months because people need computers to work from home and they're seeking entertainment in their quarantine.

What happens when the rush of work from home hardware orders fades and people's loss of income starts to really impact their buying decisions is a question for the future.

The other reason why they're doing well is because they're doing well-- there's a lot of savings sloshing around looking for a return, and it seems to be pooling in businesses that are performing disproportionately well versus the market.

I think this is different than the "fundamentals" argument above, this is investors chasing returns and whether the fundamentals are up or down, the choice is between Apple and some other stock (versus Apple or nothing). Non-stock investments net zero return right now-- bonds, cash, etc. Again, it'll be interesting to learn if a change in peoples incomes over time and a roll off in sales drives money out of Apple disproportionately to the market.
[automerge]1597869066[/automerge]
The first trillion required many doublings. The second trillion required just one.

I suppose I could have just left it at that... 😄
 
hopefully not over the $460 mark when the split occurs soon. You’d still get 10 shares for the same value ~ depending on if a slight dip occurs during trading hours when it occurs.

I’ll be buying 4 initially then dollar cost averaging over the next 30 days maybe 10x the amount.
Bought it At 448
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
I hate the butterfly keyboard. Yet people kept buying those machines. So customers, in general, must disagree with me.

Or customers, in general, make decisions based on an array of factors while people here tend to pick one negative and obsess?
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
Tim keeps bringing Apple up to new heights, yet he is so terrible for Apple and should be replaced with a Steve Jobs 2.0 /s

it truly has nothing to with him

it truly has nothing to do with the performance of the business

the sentiment towards the tech market is just crazy and irrational.

the world is going down the toilet at the moment and yet values companies who sell basically discretionary products (that can be done without) the highest?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Enlightened Doggo
Tim keeps bringing Apple up to new heights, yet he is so terrible for Apple and should be replaced with a Steve Jobs 2.0 /s

What those haters just can’t accept and acknowledge is that Tim Cook’s skill sets is more suited to run Apple right now than if Steve was still around. Even when Steve was around, Cook was the man running the company behind close doors. Steve mostly focused on products while Cook ran the business day to day. Cook has been running Apple a lot longer than people acknowledge, and his experience certainly shows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SuperCachetes
hopefully not over the $460 mark when the split occurs soon. You’d still get 10 shares for the same value ~ depending on if a slight dip occurs during trading hours when it occurs.
The price doesn't matter. However many share you own pre-split, you'll have four times as many post-split.
 
I've been a bit nervous; there's a conspiracy theory going around that the only reason the markets are doing well is that the feds are pumping trillions of dollars into them. The day that stops, according to the rumors, the markets will crash hard.

Now, I tend to not believe in conspiracy theories; they are usually ridiculous and absurd. But the incompetence of our current administration has grown to levels never seen before in this country, and it feels like we're in unprecedented times. That, along with the pandemic, has me hovering a finger over the "Sell everything" button which I normally wouldn't do.

Time will tell, I guess.
i look at it in a similar way:

basically everything else is doing so badly, all capital is running for the lifeboats (FAANG and other stable/large companies)
 
Tim Cook: Excellent for shareholders, awful for customers.

Tim Cook is the best CEO in the world for shareholders. But for the customers who loved Apple's user-friendliness (including the most intuitive form of the GUI, which is skeuomorphism) and innovation under Steve Jobs, Tim Cook is horrible.

I agree that Tim is good for shareholders and investment firms and trust funds etc. I can say Tim’s leadership along with the top brass has guided Apple very well. CEOs usually after a company is matured are not innovators or think tank mind sets. They need to ensure the company’s goals and staff are working well with one another. Nobody likes an internal coup.

skeuomorphism still lives on in iOS Clock and in the Phone Voicemail dialler. But skeuomorphism just for its own sake now doesn’t make sense.

a Contact book essentially is still a contact dB. notes is notes - we don’t need a lined ruler or page to know we can enter notes there, and it looks silly when you want a table therein or check list. skeuomorphism has its place when the masses had no idea what a smartphone was - trust me, S60/UIQ/PocketPC/Smartphone Edition all we’re very confusing in their UIs let’s not even dare think about the fisher price look of Windows Phone 7/8 lmao. I’m sure you do NOT want any of those UIs trying to mature.

the market has spoken and won : Android and iOS.

Big Sur is super refreshing, at least to me the same way OSX was when it first debuted.

Aple now needs to overhaul its applications that are meant for real and powerful collaboration !! The classic Apple Works apps regardless of their names today are still just “alternatives” to Microsoft staples. Microsoft’s Teams has incredibly evolved and honestly very very good! We’re is Apples competing unified product? Why does Macs still ship with photo booth?!?!?

Final Cut pro, is a great example of proppa software. Yet where is the new innovative software for the other professionals in different fields?
 
At a basic level, if you're looking at "fundamentals" it's because of this:

View attachment 945656

The growth isn't linear. As a company becomes more profitable, it's able to invest into more things and grow in more directions at once-- so you'd expect superlinear growth. If you assume ROI is constant for all profit levels, then you'd expect exponential growth, but it's really hard to maintain that kind of ROI. For small businesses, there are market forces that buffet you, when a company gets as big as Apple it's hard to keep that level of efficiency and to find markets big enough to grow into.

That chart isn't a smooth curve for a lot of macro-economic reasons though too. Recessions, trade wars, pandemics, all affect a company's fortunes. Right now, we're in a recession, but tech is outperforming for two big reasons: they can continue operations because their workers can work from home in a way that other industries can't, and demand for hardware and services from companies like Apple has remained strong over the past few months because people need computers to work from home and they're seeking entertainment in their quarantine.

What happens when the rush of work from home hardware orders fades and people's loss of income starts to really impact their buying decisions is a question for the future.

The other reason why they're doing well is because they're doing well-- there's a lot of savings sloshing around looking for a return, and it seems to be pooling in businesses that are performing disproportionately well versus the market.

I think this is different than the "fundamentals" argument above, this is investors chasing returns and whether the fundamentals are up or down, the choice is between Apple and some other stock (versus Apple or nothing). Non-stock investments net zero return right now-- bonds, cash, etc. Again, it'll be interesting to learn if a change in peoples incomes over time and a roll off in sales drives money out of Apple disproportionately to the market.
[automerge]1597869066[/automerge]


I suppose I could have just left it at that... 😄
I love seeing that image. I am 37 and my dad has worked for Merril Lynch since I was 16 (2000). My first laptop ever was an iBook g3 (age 17) and I had also somehow talked my parents into buying me 1st gen iPod. (Age 17) No one in my family nor any of my friends used a Mac or an Apple product at this time. My dad asked what I wanted for a grad gift from HS. Since I had a laptop and mp3 player there really wasn't much else I wanted back then. He had been trying to get me interested in the financial field with stocks for a while actually kind of nagging me about it. he said I had 5 thousand to do what i want and he will help me with my portfolio and have it be kinda college fund etc. He told me to come up with a few stocks that I wanted or thought would grow and I came back and told him I want all five thousand on Apple. At the time I was just caught up in all think apple. Everyone envied my iPod and I knew it was going to be a hit, but Apples stock was at 5 dollars at the time. I fought with him for a week with him telling me this is literally the worst choice you could make so I told him from then on if it falls to 4 dollars we sell all and then I will allow him to show me the right way to do it...... Come 2020, might dad still kicks himself in the ass for not listening to me. He doesn't find it to funny when i remind him i was better at his job at the age of 18 than he was. (not really the case at all and only being lucky ass hell that my stubbornness actually paid off for once.

I guess I should put this in here. I don't own 1 single Apple product anymore since 2012. So I yes I know I am a hypocrite (and I'm fine owning it) when saying how much I don't agree with Apples choices of Management and products as a consumer, but as a share holder, I just want them keep doing what they are doing. 🤔🧐 Yes sir I sure will have my cake and eat it too🎂
 
Last edited:
Apple haven't really done anything of note since Steve passed. Perhaps the bravest thing they're doing is stepping out to make ARM Macs. That takes some guts or is doomed to fail. Either way this being the only thing of note suggests Cook's tenure will be short-lived.
Tell me another tale. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
That isn’t a conspiracy theory. That is a well documented fact. The government props up the stock market. This isn’t something that just happened under the current administration.

You can make money in the market. But there are a couple of things to consider. One is that while the market is going up prices across the board are going up. You may not be truly getting ahead. Two is that the insiders always have the best info. They know when to get out or get in.

It seems absurd that when we have a pandemic and large sectors of the economy are shut down that our stock markets would be breaking record. It seems absurd because it is absurd. Which means success isn’t tied to (or at least perfectly tied to) actual results as it should be.
So short it. Good luck.

BTW, market returns are way better over time than any increases in prices.

Markets look forward. The pandemic is largely over from an economic perspective. Stuff is opening back up and large companies are doing well. The Target number was impressive.
 
hopefully not over the $460 mark when the split occurs soon. You’d still get 10 shares for the same value ~ depending on if a slight dip occurs during trading hours when it occurs.

I’ll be buying 4 initially then dollar cost averaging over the next 30 days maybe 10x the amount.
The split makes no difference other than psychological.
 
The split makes no difference other than psychological.
The split makes no difference other than psychological.

Actually ... those that hold stocks prior to the split their affected. Dividend is quartered (since it's a 4:1) split meaning after the split each stock only gets 1/4 of the dividend until the next quarter starts. Buying the stocks after the split each gets the full dividend. I've done my research, I think yours missed this.
 
Actually ... those that hold stocks prior to the split their affected. Dividend is quartered (since it's a 4:1) split meaning after the split each stock only gets 1/4 of the dividend until the next quarter starts. Buying the stocks after the split each gets the full dividend. I've done my research, I think yours missed this.

That’s not how that works. The August 13 dividend has already been paid and settled. It’s a done deal that was weeks ahead of any split. The dividend will be adjusted for the split going forward, i.e. Apple aren’t going to revert to an 0.82/share dividend next quarter. The next dividend will be in the 0.21/share range, and hopefully Apple will continue to raise it over time like they have in the past.

Not sure what “research” you did, but you can easily look back at 2014 and see what happened to the dividend-per-share price as we moved through the previous split.

https://investor.apple.com/dividend-history/default.aspx
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.