If Air 2 doesn't have sapphire I'll just get the lower priced Air 1 because there would be no incentive to get basically the same product (Air 2) with higher price.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple's Move to Revolutionize Sapphire Manufacturing Likely to Leave Competitors Behind
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
If Air 2 doesn't have sapphire I'll just get the lower priced Air 1 because there would be no incentive to get basically the same product (Air 2) with higher price.
We'll have to see. It maybe a good thing or it might be a gimmick. Apple is known for using exotic stuff just to be able to say that their products are unique (whether there is a real benefit to it or not).
Besides it looks like Gorilla Glass 3 (not used by Apple) is pretty good too so the use of sapphire it will not be a clear win for Apple. There will be trade-offs (higher cost, brittle etc.) and it is not clear what the consumer is going to prefer.
If sapphire is brittle and breaks easily, I'm not understanding why it is such a breakthrough for phone screens. You never hear people complain about scratching their phone screens, but you see plenty of cracked screens.
Have a Movado with a sapphire crystal. I've worn it for about 5 years, and I am extremely hard on it. No scratches. No cracks.
i5 today costs as much today as the DUAL-CORE used to cost when it came out. Wrong analogy.
They don't seem to know a lot about hardware. I am sure Sapphire will be a useless feature people would gladly pay $200 more to get.
Think we'll be getting a all sapphire iPhone in a few years
It'll have to launch alongside the iGun. You think iPhone robberies are bad now...
Apple probably won't make it water resistant because they'd have to cover the lightning port and they hate covering ports.
Nope. It's the British English spelling. You should look it up -- it's the language used in Britain before Yanks bastardised it.
Yeah, well cars sound cool and are supposed to be really practical. It is a benefit for people who are lazy. But for people who actually walk, they're unnecessary.
Honestly though -- how can a more durable phone be a bad thing? If you want your phone made out glass and virgins' tears because you're too perfect to drop it, that's fine -- but don't take the high-ground attitude about it.
Ha, well played! LOL
There is no way Apple will be able to please everybody in this game unless everyone gets their toys for free. Or maybe even then, "shameless copycats are better!"
serious questions: apple would be copying samsung if they did that, right?
gorilla glass is scratch resistant as well. apple just doesnt want to share profits with another company, rightfully so i guess.
no, quite the opposite, since everyone will want to protects its screen even more. even if they market is as "unbreakable" and "unscratchable", people will put protectors on.
not gonna happen
i hope thats a joke, otherwise shows the perfect example of a typical superficial apple user.
huehueheu, lets masturbate because you wrote an anti-samsung comment!
Smart move and worthwhile investment judging by all the hairline scratches I have on my iPhone and HTC. The competition can't easily copy that feature, just like Touch ID.
If Apple hadn't purchased Authentec, I think everyone knows that Samsung would have used the same solution within a year or so.
If Apple hadn't purchased Authentec, I think everyone knows that Samsung would have used the same solution within a year or so.
In use, the little scratches on our phones doesn't make much difference. But when the screen is off they are very noticeable. I believe that will make the iPhone look better and then help with sales. Thing of all the times everyone's phone is sitting on a table at a bar or dinner. If the iPhone looks better without scuffs and scratches, that is going to help with sales a bit.
But it is also going to look great on a spec sheet. "Sapphire". Wow, it is almost like getting a diamond engagement ring.
The glass on my iPhone 5 is the most durable part of my phone. You should see the aluminum!!!! I had to put a belkin squishy case that covers everything except the screen, and it looks like a brand new phone.
For full disclosure, I did have my screen replaced, but that's because it went flying off my handlebars. However, the only damage to the screen was the actual breakage. The rest of the screen was in perfect condition. I've had my new screen for about 5 months I think and with a good cleaning it looks like it did when I had it replaced.
So yeah, if Sapphire can make it even more scratch resistant, I'm all for that. But I don't want to pay $$$ more for it. I'm fine with Gorilla Glass.
What price has it jacked up?
CRT monitors were also just fine... spinning hard drives were just fine, USB 2.0 was just fine, the core2duo was just fine, entering your password and no touch id is just fine... I don't think there is anything you can't say that wasn't 'just fine' before it was updated or improved upon.
Hard to see how you appear to take for granted or look forward to/hope this news means a crack/shatter proof display when it has been pointed out many times that sapphire glass is apparently inherently more brittle and prone to cracking/shattering than the current Gorilla glass material...
...and then proceed to question the one area where sapphire glass is superior to current materials? Sapphire glass is not scratch proof, but it is more scratch resistant than Gorilla glass, and also more brittle and less flexible for a given thickness, according to the limited information I can gather.
I can't see how this could be a for anything else than the rumoured iWatch or iBand or other wearable segment device.
The only way it would make real financial sense for a touch display for an iPhone or iPad is if it brings something else to the table besides scratch resistance. Maybe they have found a way to make it three time more oleophobic during the manufacturing process than the current post-treated glass method, for example? I know that on my phone and iPad, fingerprints and smears from using virtual joypads, etc are much more annoying than scratches, which I have yet to encounter on any of my devices. However, I have had to repair a shattered screen on my daughter's iPad and I don't see how sapphire would help with that problem - more like actually worsen it because it would make repair costs increase.
As for Notebooks, sapphire actually seems like an inferior material, lesser light passthrough at a given thickness, etc. and notebook screens being less prone to scratching inherently because they are closed and protected during transport.
Who knows - maybe I am totally wrong, but another thing I am skeptic about is posters advocating putting a very thin layer of sapphire glass on top of the display. Wouldn't that make the display ultra sensitive to hairline cracks and spidering cracks etc.?? Glad to be corrected in I'm of base there.
Don't really get the advantage of using it for touch pads on notebooks either. Wouldn't be able to notice a scratch on that surface as it is now.
It is a mystery to me, but I'm sure it will all make sense when the use for the sapphire is revealed later this year...
...
But it is also going to look great on a spec sheet. "Sapphire". Wow, it is almost like getting a diamond engagement ring.
Yeah... It depends. Many (most?) people probably do not know about sapphire (not that many people own Rolex). Besides, some may be intrigued by Gorilla Glass more than by Sapphire
It could be a generational and gender thing.If sapphire is brittle and breaks easily, I'm not understanding why it is such a breakthrough for phone screens. You never hear people complain about scratching their phone screens, but you see plenty of cracked screens.
Here at work the clients are always opening up new tickets because of the Glass on all IOS devices are shattering or cracking. I don't see Sapphire and a long term solution.