The new MacBook Air also features a haptic trackpad, so it's entirely feasible that we'll one day get them to vibrate around like RC cars:
![]()
It will give a new meaning to the phrase: my laptop is faster than yours.
The new MacBook Air also features a haptic trackpad, so it's entirely feasible that we'll one day get them to vibrate around like RC cars:
![]()
I had the same experience. As I was spec'ing the MBA I noticed that the price rose quick with extra RAM and storage. I ended up getting a refurbished 2018 MBP on Apple's refurbished store for just $100 more than a similarly spec'ed MBA.New 13" Macbook Air vs 13" Macbook Pro? I am using a 2013 MBA which I love. I was eagerly waiting an update to the screen to buy a new one. The resolution on my MBA is noticeably dated. I found the MBA sitting right next to a MBP in Best Buy. The MBA is not significantly smaller. The screen on the MBP is noticeably brighter (agree with above) and the processor (specs) are much better. Money aside (about a $300 difference between the 2 with 256 gb) why buy the MBA? Initially I bought it in 2013 because it was significantly lighter, more portable, and better battery life. I welcome your comments.
Ok, so you need to go buy a cable instead of buying an adapter/dongle. Don't change the fact that it won't charge an iPhone right out of the boxYou can just use a cable. No special adapter needed unless you really want to.
Was the loss of the illuminated Apple logo part of the “upgrade” as well?
Were a lot of people surprised? There were rumors abound of the imminent release of a new MBA with retina.Apple in October gave us a major surprise with the launch of an entirely revamped, updated version of the MacBook Air, its most popular and affordable notebook option.
I just find it ironic that Apple sells laptops that won't even charge an iPhone right out of the box without purchasing an adapter.
I agree that the soldered 128 GB SSD is problematic especially considering the price point, but how is not having USB-A ports planned obsolescence when USB-C / Thunderbolt 3 is the newer / faster standard?Soldered 128GB, no USB-A or SD card slot to workaround storage is outright criminal planned-obsolescence. Why is there no outrage about this?
The ultra-portable category still appeals to some, though there's an argument to be made that Apple has taken it too far with the MacBook (which will likely be Apple's first Mac to get ARM chips), and the high prices for ultra-portable are no longer as justifiable as they used to be with the competition from tablets and smartphones for lighter use cases.This 'new' macbook air only gets it's name because of the wedge shape, which as we know, is now entirely uneccessary given the thinness of the current macbook line. Are people that in love with the wedge shape? It was only used 10 years ago in the original designs to create the ILLUSION of thinness, even though the back half of the laptop was quick thicker.
Besides, are customers wowed anymore by how thin a laptop is? I just don't get it.
Tried the new one, screams throwaway machine all over, another very Cook-era product. (Although less soldering is appreciated, still a massive cash grab)
Right because Safari performs so well lol.
I recommend demoing a new MacBook Air in a store; it will take less than a minute for you to know whether you can live with the keyboard or not. . .
The ultra-portable category still appeals to some, though there's an argument to be made that Apple has taken it too far with the MacBook (which will likely be Apple's first Mac to get ARM chips), and the high prices for ultra-portable are no longer as justifiable as they used to be with the competition from tablets and smartphones for lighter use cases.
But is the new i5 processor faster than the i7 processor in my old MacBook Air?
Hey, it's an un-noticable 2mm thinner! That sliver of extra thinness and .5 ounce of less weight is EASILY worth having a computer that's a ticking time bomb with a crappy keyboard.![]()
too many Cooks
This 'new' macbook air only gets it's name because of the wedge shape, which as we know, is now entirely uneccessary given the thinness of the current macbook line. Are people that in love with the wedge shape? It was only used 10 years ago in the original designs to create the ILLUSION of thinness, even though the back half of the laptop was quick thicker.
Besides, are customers wowed anymore by how thin a laptop is? I just don't get it.
The 512/16gb mba is ~300usd less than the same configuration TB mbp. That’s almost a quarter pretax price of that mba, not small. I wouldn’t throw the nTB mbp in the comparison since it has the 2nd gen keyboard, better screen be darned (I’m not a graphics person). So I think for many people on the fence of mba vs TB mbp, it’s worth a look to see how the mba handles your particular workload. But that’s the situation created by the lineup. Lots of folks unsure. If there was a nTB mbp with 3rd gen kb, with or without quad core, I wouldn’t think twice, but as is, .25 lighter, 3rd gen kB, 300 less, powerful enough, potentially a good pickup.