This is a good solid 1.0 release. Remember Google Maps has been going for several years and more. Google won't be laughing today. They know they are about to be eclipsed by Apple.
Yes this is true. Until they actually saw the app running.
This is a good solid 1.0 release. Remember Google Maps has been going for several years and more. Google won't be laughing today. They know they are about to be eclipsed by Apple.
I don't think Apple servers being "bogged up" are the reason why Apple Maps can't find basic addresses in New York City.
Remember his MobileMe explosion? I believe it went something along the lines of "Well, why the F### doesn't it do that, then!?"The people who cry "Steve would never have allowed this" are funny. Steve probably was one of the ones who pushed this given they had to have decided more than a year ago if they were going to build a brand new maps app from the group up.
This has nothing to do with Apple going thermonuclear on Google and everything to do with Google hindering Apple's ability to move forward and innovate.
As the saying goes, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Sorry but this was a purely dumb move by Apple. Google maps were fine and worked as needed. If it needed more functionality, hand it to google instead of writing your own app. The amount of time and money spent just to move to your own map platform is beyond stupid.
Wow. Everyone is criticising an app they didn't use much before iOS 6...
Mark my word, Google will release a Maps app for iOS. Google needs the revenue from the ads/sponsored POIs in Maps, and they need the millions of iOS users around the world to tap on them.
I've been using the beta for a while now and the maps functionality for where I am based in the uk (cheshire/manchester/liverpool) has been very good. I love the cartography and I have found positions of addresses more accurate and journey durations more realistic as well. Traffic is much better than google. I did miss public transport at first but the timetables included in the google implementation were never correct anyway. Sure there's going to be teething trouble (I feel sorry for anyone who lives in Birmingham the mapping certainly looks poor there) but in the longterm apple's implemation looks like a very promising solution.
In terms of POI's sure theres less than google at this moment in time but the service has gone into widespread use only yesterday. Please remember that apple uses yelp for points of interest. IF THERE ARE POINTS OF INTEREST MISSING DO EVERYONE A FAVOUR AND ADD THEM ON YELP. If everyone adds a couple of POI then this functionality will be on par with googles in no time! Remember google also relied on crowd sourcing for many of their POI's.
Simarly if there is a problem with the map rather than complain on hear use the report a problem feature built into the app.
Remember his MobileMe explosion? I believe it went something along the lines of "Well, why the F### doesn't it do that, then!?"
Someone at Apple needs to have that same conversation with the Mapping team.
Apple has over 100 billion dollars. Why don't they just buy Google Maps and overlay their UI on top of it? Why buy mapping data that is years old?
I'm really excited Apple has stuck two fingers up to the naysayers and rolled out the new Maps app to the entire iOS universe. They need to start from somewhere, and this innovative mapping technology will improve the more we use it, and help improve it.
This is a good solid 1.0 release. Remember Google Maps has been going for several years and more. Google won't be laughing today. They know they are about to be eclipsed by Apple.
Apple has over 100 billion dollars. Why don't they just buy Google Maps and overlay their UI on top of it? Why buy mapping data that is years old?
I think you are looking for the word "license"
Here's how I think things went:
Apple goes to Google and wants to add turn-by-turn or make other changes/innovations to the mapping app. Google, of course, says no (don't fault them for that) as they have Apple at their mercy. At some point Apple looks at it and says, "Man we're paying Google a boatload of money for a mapping app we have no control over and can't advance." They weigh the pros and cons of creating their own app. Pros: Complete innovative control, CHEAPER, and yes it spites Google. Cons: polish, TIME and effort.
In the end Apple said pros outweigh the cons, got together a bunch of partners and went to work. The timing of their releases is relatively set and they decided to go ahead and release the maps app as soon as they felt they could as to cut ties with Google, and introduce new features as soon as possible.
It will take time. But Google Maps, aside from the data, hasn't been updated in forever. The loading mechanisms are slow and sometimes rendered the app useless. Apple decided to create their own vector-rendering system thereby giving the app a better base to build on. The data will come with time. It's taken Google AT LEAST 7 years (since that's only how long it's been out in the marketplace) to compile the data they have. Apple's app is in its infancy, but at least they are able to advance it on their own terms as opposed to being stuck under Google's thumb - unable to update the app as Google wanted to keep it an Android advantage.
I don't fault either company in any of this.