So if you came to my house and I offered you a cup of coffee, but instead gave you some raw coffee beans and cold water, would you be happy? If I told you that 6 hours ago the freshly-ground, steaming hot coffee that I'm drinking was also nothing more than raw beans and cold water, would that make it ok? Which would you prefer?
I don't understand why anyone would want to defend Apple on this. The fact that they're 6 years behind Google Maps might EXPLAIN why Apple's own Maps app is much worse, but it doesn't EXCUSE Apple for releasing it in its current state.
If a company is leading the way and creating innovative products and services, there's no shame in having a shaky start, especially since there's nobody to learn from or be compared to. But if you follow that company's path 6 years later, ostensibly to rival or improve on their product and repeat all their mistakes, then you deserve every piece of criticism you get.
Just wait until the rest of mainstream media picks up the story.
I guarantee you this is going to be bad.
You want more info? It's coming from Apple and the gazillions of iOS users.
ONCE MORE: to expect it to be as comprehensive from day ONE as a seven-year old Google app is LUDICROUS. Get over it and grow up, please.
Do you remember when Google Maps was introduced back in 2006. It didn't have subways for any city. NONE.
It took a whole year just to get partial subway for NYC, DC and San Francisco.
What I'm saying is that we are "primed" to look critically at Apple's take on mapping. Understand and realize that to get where Google Maps is today required 7 years of innovation. Apple just got in the game.
I am not excusing the flaws within their mapping division, but for a first time foray into public release it's beats the living crap out of what Google released back in 2006.
OH, and if you can't remember what cities were even mapped by Google in 2006 - only a handful.
I don't. Same thing happened with youtube app. And look... we have one downloadable on the appstore already directly from Google.
You are right that it hasn't exactly been confirmed. It has been alluded to many times over by Google execs. I fully expect Google Maps to make an appearance, perhaps even with turn by turn this time.
None of Google products was a poorly baked as Apple maps.
My home town Niagara Falls has clouds covering half the town. What is this?
My thoughts exactly about being so dependent on technology.
So if you came to my house and I offered you a cup of coffee, but instead gave you some raw coffee beans and cold water, would you be happy? If I told you that 6 hours ago the freshly-ground, steaming hot coffee that I'm drinking was also nothing more than raw beans and cold water, would that make it ok? Which would you prefer?
I don't understand why anyone would want to defend Apple on this. The fact that they're 6 years behind Google Maps might EXPLAIN why Apple's own Maps app is much worse, but it doesn't EXCUSE Apple for releasing it in its current state.
If a company is leading the way and creating innovative products and services, there's no shame in having a shaky start, especially since there's nobody to learn from or be compared to. But if you follow that company's path 6 years later, ostensibly to rival or improve on their product and repeat all their mistakes, then you deserve every piece of criticism you get.
AMEN to your last statement...!
And you see what I mean by not being in a hurry... They have to allow Google maps in the appstore anyways... To avoid being slapped by anti-trust... Why not just license it for a few more years till your app is ready for prime time and save the embarrassment too... Something just doesn't add up... I am abusing Apple at the moment.. But, somewhere it doesn't make sense to me...
What I was simply saying is that Apple's foray into mapping is novice at best. Their mapping division is in it's infancy. Personally, I don't believe it's ready for prime time, but I do understand that this is Apple's first time entering this domain at this magnitude - they did an ok job - relatively speaking.
My point of reference is all companies who have ever entered the mapping industry for the first time.
Is navigation novel - no. Can I compare this attempt to 2006. No. But I can compare it to any companies first attempt to enter any market. There is a learning curve.
Get back to me in 2019 (7 years from now) when Apple's mapping division has had the appropriate time to mature.
Firstly, I'm not defending Apple. I'm simply stating that for this magnitude, considering their maps division infancy, their attempt with respect to their initial entrance into the mapping domain is a relatively good shot. Compared to Google - I will agree it's absolute garbage.
However you will have to agree that Google has a 7+ year head start on Apple with regard to mapping.
What about integrate just a Navigator App with TomTom, .. and forget about the only one working seriously Maps .... Google Maps!!! .... we need only turn by turn navigation, if there is an app for everything why don't do that ????!!!!!!! ..... EpicFail!
Agree with You in everything but "just wait 7 years until Apple get's it right" (this might creative engineering of your statement).
Google Maps is massively crowd-sourced, not only from their Android ecosystem but from all over the web as well. There are multiple ways of participating in making Google maps better (i have submitted a lot of different stuff) and it's a piece of cake to enter. Hell, some places in Africa are mapped by the users themselves...
Maps is just IOS so far, it's unclear to me how one participate or how to make any improvements and if it's possible at all. As other has stated, they haven't have much luck in seeing any corrections being done during the beta phase and just counting the number of mistakes (over 30) around my address makes me prepare for the worst - and yes that means looking at other options (Android), this is how markets works.
Google have invested heavily in having killer maps and if they want to show IOS users what they are missing that's just the way it is. People here seem to look at Google maps as a static thing and that Apple maps will surpass it in 18 months (think I saw some egghead say this via Daring Fireball) - I just don't see it... enlighten me if you got special insight... so far I'm seeing Apple apologists and reverse trolling.
Seriously has any product released by Google not been "quarter-baked"?
I can't believe Apple Execs stood up at the Keynote and sold this garbage as a 'cool new feature' when they must've known it was pathetic junk not even a tenth ready for prime time.
It makes them look like a bunch of complete dicks - dishonest dicks trying to sell crapness as greatness.
Perhaps they should stop dicking around with this dickery and start getting the basics right like, y'know, making a new Mac Pro or something.
Sack Tim Cook now. Just sack him. We don't need no more Gil Amelio thanks.
Put Jonny Ive in the hotseat. Someone who'll call crap crap and scrap crap that's crap.
I fully expect Google Maps to make an appearance, perhaps even with turn by turn this time.
You logic doesn't quite follow as for Google to get GMaps to where it is today required that 7 years of in-the-market crowd-sourced data.
You are absolutely correct in everything you have said. Thing is, as consumers, most people just don't give a ish. We had soemthing working. Now we basically don't. We don't care why that happened, just that it did.![]()
Wow, who would've thought a Maps app would cause this much controversy?
There are problems that can't be solved by throwing a lot of money at it. This isn't one of those problems.