It does not matter, we HAD a tool that worked, now we don't, end of story!!!
This. Also, are all the Apple apologists expecting Google to stand still while Apple tries to catch up? In 7 years, Apple Maps will maybe get to where Google is now, but by then, Google will be lightyears ahead, having mapped the whole world through street view, down to the last village in the forests of Guatemala. They have an infrastructure of regional offices in place, they have the vast search databases, there is no way in hell Apple can come close to that.
I sincerely don't think so. Otherwise he would be doing be the same when iMac dropped floppies, the fake "antennagate" scandal and so on. Apple has thrived on bold decisions, and this is just another one of them for strategic reasons (long term non-reliance on Google).
Design-wise, Apple Maps seems great. Vector-based maps are MUCH more responsive than iOS 5's Maps. Directions are great. Traffic information is useful.
You want more info? It's coming from Apple and the gazillions of iOS users.
ONCE MORE: to expect it to be as comprehensive from day ONE as a seven-year old Google app is LUDICROUS. Get over it and grow up, please.
p.s.: And it's "somersaults" by the way...![]()
This. Also, are all the Apple apologists expecting Google to stand still while Apple tries to catch up? In 7 years, Apple Maps will maybe get to where Google is now, but by then, Google will be lightyears ahead, having mapped the whole world through street view, down to the last village in the forests of Guatemala. They have an infrastructure of regional offices in place, they have the vast search databases, there is no way in hell Apple can come close to that.
I simply don't understand why people are making excuses for this!![]()
It does. Click the blue arrow on the banner above a map pin, scroll down on the next page to report a problem.
Make them an offer they can't refuse.
But Apple Maps is not 7 years behind. The map data is server side and can be updated 24/7. Features such as Transit maps didn't appear until less than two years ago and for all we know it could be added very shortly to Apple Maps. But, by all means, overreact just like people do to any quibble that is found with each iteration of iOS.[/QUOTE]
There are four schools near my house. The only one shown on apple maps closed 40 years ago!!! Out of the 15 petrol stations found, 14 are not petrol stations and the one that is closed 10 years ago.
Overreaction? Quibble?! Get real.
Maybe it was Google that do not want to license it out? it takes two to tango.
iOS and Android are competing head to head. Anyone running business on one side CANNOT be relying the otherside to give you breaks. Simple business.
Apple will be fine. The Map app will be fine. Competition to make Mapping better will be good for us.
I simply don't understand why people are going ape**** crazy over this!![]()
But Apple Maps is not 7 years behind. The map data is server side and can be updated 24/7. Features such as Transit maps didn't appear until less than two years ago and for all we know it could be added very shortly to Apple Maps. But, by all means, overreact just like people do to any quibble that is found with each iteration of iOS.[/QUOTE]
There are four schools near my house. The only one shown on apple maps closed 40 years ago!!! Out of the 15 petrol stations found, 14 are not petrol stations and the one that is closed 10 years ago.
Overreaction? Quibble?! Get real.
I guess we're reacting differently to this because I learned how to find schools and gas stations long before Google came along.
Do you remember when Google Maps was introduced back in 2006. It didn't have subways for any city. NONE.
It took a whole year just to get partial subway for NYC, DC and San Francisco.
What I'm saying is that we are "primed" to look critically at Apple's take on mapping. Understand and realize that to get where Google Maps is today required 7 years of innovation. Apple just got in the game.
I am not excusing the flaws within their mapping division, but for a first time foray into public release it's beats the living crap out of what Google released back in 2006.
OH, and if you can't remember what cities were even mapped by Google in 2006 - only a handful.
Citation: (for those who are source happy): http://news.com.com/2061-10812_3-6160719.html
I agree on your last statement... But I do not believe Google chose not to license... It is more likely that they asked for a very steep amount to re-license... Which again doesn't make sense as they are mainly interested in data logging of users... Which is their main bread and butter...
I guess we're reacting differently to this because I learned how to find schools and gas stations long before Google came along.
People who utilized maps for day to day life are going to go ape **** crazy. I know I used public transport. Now I need to download another app (which I don't know is as reliable, maybe it is) and wait for maps from google to hit the appstore. Problem is, the latter hasn't happened yet. Yes, there are a lot of people that rely on google maps to quickly an efficiently get from point A to B to C.
Pathetic.
I guess we're reacting differently to this because I learned how to find schools and gas stations long before Google came along.
People can still find everything they can without maps. Hell, you can do everything you NEED to do without a smartphone, or a phone for that matter. The human race has been getting along just fine for a much longer time without these technologies than with them. The thing is these technologies are conveniences. I don't want to have to look at a paper mask, or ask a gas station clerk (most of which don't even give good directions anymore since they are all kids who grew up in the era of the computer) when I could, much more easily, find where I need to go on my smartphone. That is why I bought the damn thing... to make things I do day to day easier and more efficient.