Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Among the user complaints regarding Apple's maps sent to the BBC were:

- Some towns appear to be missing, such as Stratford-upon-Avon and Solihull.

Nothing wrong with that, Solihull could do with being taken down a peg or two.

Having said that - Apple ought to be aware of Solihull, they do have a store there...
 
This has nothing to do with Apple going thermonuclear on Google and everything to do with Google hindering Apple's ability to move forward and innovate. For example, Google restricting APIs that would allow Apple to implement turn-by-turn navigation.



This is Google's doing. What other choice did Apple have?

I get that. But Apple Maps seems lacks features AND lacks correct map data. Features are subjective but the maps data is a crucial element.

I just expected more from a company as big & talented as Apple.
 
At last week's keynote, Apple's new app looked like it was going to be a viable alternative to Google's but the result in its current state is very disappointing - a rather large step back, imho
 
Since my TomTom app will not load...

...I used Apple Maps for directions. Seems like I am meeting friends tomorrow in a field.

Also, "pub" is not recognised, but "bar" is. Yes, in the UK.
 
Wow. Everyone is criticising an app they didn't use much before iOS 6...

That's because Apple Maps didn't exist before iOS 6!

I kid, I kid. But for real...a LOT of people (consumers AND developers) relied on the maps integration in iOS to be rock solid. A lot of Apple's patents (including one they sued Samsung over) referenced mapping integration as being integral to the OS.
 
Wow. Everyone is criticising an app they didn't use much before iOS 6...

Everyone doesn't use it much, or you don't use it much?

I'm in maps all the time. Finding places to eat or get coffee. I use it to find the nearest bank. I find open parks with maps to go enjoy hobbies. I use the search function to find businesses and get their contact info.

Do you have a case of, "I don't do it so no one else does it" ? :rolleyes:
 
if it's based on TT's database...

then God help us.

Numerous times I have sent in corrections to TT for their London database....guess what? Errors still on the database.

Not so with Google Maps.
 
I don't think age is the issue. The sat image of my home is probably mere weeks old, judging by the state of an unfinished building next door. On the other hand, maps cannot find about half the coffee shops in downtown Boston, including ones that have been there a log time. It's not age, it's completeness.

You neglected to quote my entire post, which I went into there being consistency issues.


I don't think all the data is 2 or 3 years old. There is a freeway that was just recently finished that shows up fine on Apple maps in my area. Google Maps is correct too, however the satellite image is actually older and shows it under construction still.

I think the big issue here is the inconsistancy of the map data globally. Some areas are crisp and fresh (like my area), while others appear to be using really old data.

With which I fully agree with you.
 
Google is just sitting back laughing at the whole mess. Will be interesting to see where this goes.

After some problems with the new maps, I wanted to revert back to IOS5 and Google Maps.

But, noooooooooooo.... Apple tells me I screwed.
 
I haven't had any issues with this app, but I'm sure Maps is one of those things that can be a great experience for one person, and a buggy nightmare for another. The logistics of mapping the world and all the data that's required for turn-by-turn GPS, I'm not surprised the service isn't perfect. We expect polished products from Apple, but I'm guessing this one is just going to take time given the scale and variables related to the project.

Yes we do. That has always been their strength that their apps and maps (well...Google's maps) were really usable and looked good from iPhone 1. Of course they were more basic, but at the time they were the best. Now, we have literally gone backwards which is the most disappointing bit of this whole thing. And backwards does not equal progress in IT.
 
Let's not kid ourselves here, the new maps app needs a lot of work...a lot! However I am confident that Apple will get it right eventually. The world is a big place so I can't imagine all the time and effort that goes into accurately mapping the whole thing.

fair statement - but use google, and keep thee apple map attempt out of the mainstream until it's ready.
 
Yeah, my iPhone has no idea where I live in DC, it can't handle single letter streets or something. It's really bad.

Try

100 M ST NE Washington DC 20002

It's horrible.

DC is terrible, that's confirmed by me as well. Truly awful.

Sadly there are many people here who cannot accept any criticism of Apple, constructive or otherwise, without jumping blindly to defend them. In this case they have not done a good job at all, and the best thing to do would be to admit that and try to fix the problem as soon as possible.

I absolutely love Apple, but I am not going to defend them anymore.


That is actually embarrassing.

If you compare Google and Apple's new Maps with Washington DC you'll see a similar outcome. The data set is severely lacking. I have no idea who signed off on the new Maps app, and I am certain that Steve would have never allowed this one to pass this soon.

Half baked, no, quarter baked is what I would call their new solution.
 
If you don't like the free built-in app, just spend $2 or $3 and buy one that you like. Granted, some do get expensive but those are usually apps that have "offline" maps. Waze, for instance, though, is free. Picking TomTom as a partner perhaps was the 1st mistake.
 
Am I the ONLY person who hasn't had any issues with Apple Maps and ALWAYS had issues with google maps???? I know I can't be because when I work in NYC I've been TOLD not to use google for search. When I was just in Miami it was off by more than and hour TWICE with public transit and off by a MILE with one destination!
 
4. Keep Google Maps available, but build a separate Maps app. Or bribe Google to overlook the "no navigation" provision - I'm sure Apple would still have plenty of change from their $100bn cash pile.

Keeping Google Maps available may not have been an option. If Google was pissed at Apple (which I'd imagine they are, given the litigation that has been going on against Android), they probably wouldn't budge on principal alone. It's not like Google doesn't have a mountain of cash of their own. They had Apple by the cajones and they knew it.

Apple called their bluff, but unfortunately Apple wasn't holding much of a hand either.
 
This deserves to be quoted again, just for everyone who wants to string up Apple for "ruining" Maps:



You want to be angry at someone? BE ANGRY AT GOOGLE. Everyone who is whining and crying about the Apple Maps app are the same ones who griped at Apple about not offering turn-by-turn navigation. Apple was basically left with three options:

1. Keep using Google's neutered Maps app, and piss off their customers.

2. Build a new Maps app from scratch, and piss off their customers.

3. Buy an existing mapping / nav company, which may not have been financially feasible (and would likely piss off THEIR customers).

AND they were paying Google a hefty amount for their Maps data. Apple will develop the app and overall make it better than Google Maps ever was IMO. They already have a better base with the vector mapping and increased info integrated into each POI. It's only a matter of time before all this other stuff is updated and fixed.

My area's satellite imagery appears to be between 1-2 years old, not far off from Google Maps. Not sure about the 15 year old stuff.
 
Wow. Everyone is criticising an app they didn't use much before iOS 6...
...an app that replaced well-functioning Google Maps integration in iOS5. By taking that away (as opposed to, say, letting users pick which mapping system to use) Apple Maps are fair game for direct comparison.
 
If Google let Apple implement the turn by turn APIs, then we would most likely still have Google Maps as a solution. I haven't experienced the new maps from apple yet, but all I can say is that Apple knows better. They're not going to sit there and let people crap all over it. They're going to work to make it better. It will take time though.
 
Apple and Scott Forstall need to learn a lesson. Apple maps app SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!
 
This year we're finally getting everything that we didn't get last year guys. Except a properly functioning maps app.

But we're gonna get that for sure right? Maybe not this time, but the next time... Right?

:cool:
 
I've found it OK so far. Nothing too terrible. Imperfect, yes, but it does the job for the basics at least where I am.

Apple absolutely WILL invest in this. Along with Siri and iCloud their mapping app is among the most important strategic elements of their mobile offering. I suspect, like Siri, this will improve a lot in the coming months.
 
The Map data is definitely like 10 years old. My university shows this long road through a 5km wide park that hasn't been there for decades.

The maps color scheme is quite hideous too. And it's too easy to accidentally rotate the map.

One thing I do like about the new Maps app, it's MUCH faster on my iPhone 4 -- Google Maps.app would lag really bad.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.