Hoping that we are a 27" screen with no Mac in it as well.
for the same people who "needed" legacy ports back on the new MBPs ... and if it is there and continues to be on the back, stupid designWho is the sd slot for? Not video pros (they use cf-pro) and honestly I use a usb-c card reader, because how many times a day do you put sd-cards in, (and on the back is ever so convenient /s) where the dongle is hardly a big deal. Plus the dongle moves the card slot in front of the machine. I would much rather have a usb-a to be honest over a sad-card reader as it is way more often I need a dongle to mount someone’s usb thumb drive than say so. HDMI 2.1 please.
No one is calling it the iMac Pro except clickbait YouTubers and rumor sites. The current 5k iMac is not called the pro. The iMac Pro cost 4999 and was discontinued512GB HD? Are you smoking crack? You gonna put "pro" on a machine and put half a terabyte HD in it? COME ON
They won’t! Especially if it’s carrying a Mini-LED display? Yeah, the price will skyrocket. The display panel isn’t cheap.if the original iMac Pro was $5,000, can’t imagine they would lower the price
My iMac only has 512GB but is hooked up to a 16TB RAID. So it doesn’t bother me.512GB HD? Are you smoking crack? You gonna put "pro" on a machine and put half a terabyte HD in it? COME ON
Macrumors still using that clickbait fake mockup that will never happen. It will have a chin.
The former iMac Pro was just a holdover for the Mac Pro.Do you think the former iMac Pro was discontinued super early because of how bad the M1 kicked the pants off the Xeon? 24" Intel iMacs continue to be sold. In good conscience, they must not have been able to justify the price, and I'm sure it'd make previous purchasers supremely upset—even more so than discontinuing it—to have done a fire sale on it.
Do you think the former iMac Pro was discontinued super early because of how bad the M1 kicked the pants off the Xeon?
512GB HD? Are you smoking crack? You gonna put "pro" on a machine and put half a terabyte HD in it? COME ON
If it has Pro attached to the name then Jade 2C is a lock. 4C isn’t out of the question though that’s more likely a Mac Pro-only thing.
What we really need to know for both the Mac Pro and iMac Pro is if Apple is planning on separating the CPU and GPU into discrete packages, so that the Mac Pro can potentially have more than a 1:1 CPU to GPU ratio.
Probably no ECC Ram anymore.
Hoping that we are a 27" screen with no Mac in it as well.
They are just duplicating what is offered on the new 2021 MBPs only adapted towards the old 27" form factor.512GB HD? Are you smoking crack? You gonna put "pro" on a machine and put half a terabyte HD in it? COME ON
Probably no ECC Ram anymore.
The 24" is a great replacement of the older 21" iMac, the 27" is just a guess. The display could be 2-3 " bigger in a similar size form, but its more likely to resemble the 24" form factor only notably larger and deeper with the chin.The screen sizes are limited. Why not larger than 24 inch and 27 inch?
What we really need to know for both the Mac Pro and iMac Pro is if Apple is planning on separating the CPU and GPU into discrete packages, so that the Mac Pro can potentially have more than a 1:1 CPU to GPU ratio.
Yeah that image is way wrong. LOLMacrumors still using that clickbait fake mockup that will never happen. It will have a chin.
You are very funny. Yeah in good conscience, from the company who was selling premium price iMacs with a hard drive years after everybody switched.Do you think the former iMac Pro was discontinued super early because of how bad the M1 kicked the pants off the Xeon? 24" Intel iMacs continue to be sold. In good conscience, they must not have been able to justify the price, and I'm sure it'd make previous purchasers supremely upset—even more so than discontinuing it—to have done a fire sale on it.
I agree. I could be interested in an iMac but I have been using an external 28" monitor for a few years and I am not going smaller, only larger.The screen sizes are limited. Why not larger than 24 inch and 27 inch?
That would completely defeat the point and advantages of the Unified Memory. Even the concept of Jade with 2x or 4x chips will not work with unified memory unless they are on the same silicon or you were stacking massive amounts of RAM and wasting time transferring data from one CPU to another.What we really need to know for both the Mac Pro and iMac Pro is if Apple is planning on separating the CPU and GPU into discrete packages, so that the Mac Pro can potentially have more than a 1:1 CPU to GPU ratio. This would also potentially impact the iMac Pro's thermal envelope if they spread the two chips further from each other for heat dissipation.
It makes a lot of sense from an engineering standpoint, but I'm not sure if Apple is invested in developing discrete GPUs and CPUs specifically for higher end machines. This has been a concern from Pros from the start when Apple Silicon was first introduced.