Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Who is the sd slot for? Not video pros (they use cf-pro) and honestly I use a usb-c card reader, because how many times a day do you put sd-cards in, (and on the back is ever so convenient /s) where the dongle is hardly a big deal. Plus the dongle moves the card slot in front of the machine. I would much rather have a usb-a to be honest over a sad-card reader as it is way more often I need a dongle to mount someone’s usb thumb drive than say so. HDMI 2.1 please.
for the same people who "needed" legacy ports back on the new MBPs ... and if it is there and continues to be on the back, stupid design
 
if the original iMac Pro was $5,000, can’t imagine they would lower the price
They won’t! Especially if it’s carrying a Mini-LED display? Yeah, the price will skyrocket. The display panel isn’t cheap.

Who can guess what this is?

6AD73F1F-0BE5-41CB-A9DF-4BC1DAF371BB.jpeg
 
Last edited:
The notch idea seems plausible.

But 27", or only 27", seems off.

Why would=n't an iMac Pro match the Apple XDR display? At least in dimensions.

I'd be pretty excited about M1 Pro/Max and 27" w/ 120 Hz ... but seems logical that they'd offer 17" & 32", they do already produce the larger size.
 
Macrumors still using that clickbait fake mockup that will never happen. It will have a chin.

That looks more like an external monitor, but if they do a 32" chassis, they would likely have enough room to put all of the active stuff in the center of the back of the chassis/enclosure, and would then not have to have a chin at all. It seems to me completely possible that there actually could be a killer IMP with no chin.
 
Do you think the former iMac Pro was discontinued super early because of how bad the M1 kicked the pants off the Xeon? 24" Intel iMacs continue to be sold. In good conscience, they must not have been able to justify the price, and I'm sure it'd make previous purchasers supremely upset—even more so than discontinuing it—to have done a fire sale on it.
The former iMac Pro was just a holdover for the Mac Pro.
 
Do you think the former iMac Pro was discontinued super early because of how bad the M1 kicked the pants off the Xeon?

Intel stopped production of the Xeon chips that the iMac Pro used. There were replacement models available, but with Apple planning to move away from Intel, I expect they saw no reason to refresh the Intel iMac Pro with new chips and just discontinue it.

512GB HD? Are you smoking crack? You gonna put "pro" on a machine and put half a terabyte HD in it? COME ON

The current iMac 5Ks come with 512GB as do the new Apple Silicon MacBook Pros so offering 512GB to start for the Apple Silicon iMac Pro sounds reasonable to me - especially if the goal is to keep the base price between $1999 and $2299. And at least you get 16GB now, instead of the 8GB of the Intel models.


If it has Pro attached to the name then Jade 2C is a lock. 4C isn’t out of the question though that’s more likely a Mac Pro-only thing.

I wonder if the thermal system can handle the equivalent of two M1 MAX...


What we really need to know for both the Mac Pro and iMac Pro is if Apple is planning on separating the CPU and GPU into discrete packages, so that the Mac Pro can potentially have more than a 1:1 CPU to GPU ratio.

I don't believe they plan to. There were the rumors of a "Lifuka" Apple Silicon GPU, but I honestly believe that was a reference to the 16 and 32 GPU cores in the M1 Pro and M1 Max and not intended to be a discrete GPU.


Probably no ECC Ram anymore.

Not sure the DRAM Apple Silicon uses is even available in ECC.


Hoping that we are a 27" screen with no Mac in it as well.

Agreed. I am ready for a new Apple Thunderbolt Display, even if they want $1499 for it.
 
The screen sizes are limited. Why not larger than 24 inch and 27 inch?
The 24" is a great replacement of the older 21" iMac, the 27" is just a guess. The display could be 2-3 " bigger in a similar size form, but its more likely to resemble the 24" form factor only notably larger and deeper with the chin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sfg
What we really need to know for both the Mac Pro and iMac Pro is if Apple is planning on separating the CPU and GPU into discrete packages, so that the Mac Pro can potentially have more than a 1:1 CPU to GPU ratio.

I would doubt they would do that. Possibly the only way would be to rig a way to turn off the SOC GPU, and have a slot for adding one in the system or an expansion port. It would seem to be a high reach, but who knows...
 
Do you think the former iMac Pro was discontinued super early because of how bad the M1 kicked the pants off the Xeon? 24" Intel iMacs continue to be sold. In good conscience, they must not have been able to justify the price, and I'm sure it'd make previous purchasers supremely upset—even more so than discontinuing it—to have done a fire sale on it.
You are very funny. Yeah in good conscience, from the company who was selling premium price iMacs with a hard drive years after everybody switched.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: PinkyMacGodess
Wasn't the iMac Pro space gray with Xeon processors and something like $4-$5K. This will be that machines replacement, targeting pro's not the normal customer which is purpose of the colorful iMacs.
 
What we really need to know for both the Mac Pro and iMac Pro is if Apple is planning on separating the CPU and GPU into discrete packages, so that the Mac Pro can potentially have more than a 1:1 CPU to GPU ratio. This would also potentially impact the iMac Pro's thermal envelope if they spread the two chips further from each other for heat dissipation.

It makes a lot of sense from an engineering standpoint, but I'm not sure if Apple is invested in developing discrete GPUs and CPUs specifically for higher end machines. This has been a concern from Pros from the start when Apple Silicon was first introduced.
That would completely defeat the point and advantages of the Unified Memory. Even the concept of Jade with 2x or 4x chips will not work with unified memory unless they are on the same silicon or you were stacking massive amounts of RAM and wasting time transferring data from one CPU to another.
 
Will buy this the moment it is available. Hoping for M2 chips and an option for 64GB of graphics ram.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huck
Display on this iMac Pro could be even better than Pro Display XDR. MacBook Pro is using a Sharp IGZO display, which performs better than LG Display on the Pro Display XDR and iPad Pro.

Also finger-crossed for a Pro Display XDR refresh, or a cost-down model.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.