Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,272
39,085



Earlier this month, Apple filed plans for a relocated flagship retail store in San Francisco, proposing to close its existing store at 1 Stockton Street in favor of the new store three blocks north directly on Union Square. The filing was accompanied by a press release from city officials touting the project:
"Apple's new store is quite simply incredible," said Mayor Lee. "San Francisco is the Innovation Capital of the World, and I can think of no better location for the world's most stunning Apple Store than right here in Union Square. I want to thank Apple for their investment in this City and continued commitment to growing jobs in San Francisco."

"I'm excited that the company that revolutionized consumer technologies is moving to the heart of Union Square," said President Chiu. "The new Apple store will highlight technology and design innovation as well as build community at the center of our City's retail district."
apple_store_sf_union_square_large.jpg
The proposed store's typical clean lines and heavy use of metal and glass immediately drew some criticism from observers, and San Francisco Chronicle urban design critic John King has now published a critique of Apple's plans highlighting some of the design considerations and the impact the construction will apparently have on an adjacent public plaza and sculptural fountain.
What's baffling is that a company renowned for design innovation has hired one of the world's most acclaimed architecture firms, only to unload a box that would look at home in Anymall, U.S.A.

Worse, it's a box that would displace one of downtown's friendliest works of public art, a bronze fountain by Ruth Asawa that - unlike the proposed polished Apple - could exist nowhere else but here.
King confirms that the architect on the proposed project is Foster + Partners, which has reportedly been taking on a greater role in Apple's retail projects since its involvement with Apple's upcoming new headquarters campus in Cupertino.

In his critique, King takes issue with the all-glass storefront on Post Street that will see direct sun exposure for much of the day, as well as the Stockton Street frontage that will simply be an 80 foot-long windowless wall. Apple's plans also call for a narrow stairway leading up to public plaza behind the store, a plaza that will be reduced from its current size and apparently see the removal of the popular fountain sculpture that has been in place for 40 years.
The fountain was also designed as the centerpiece of the existing triangular plaza along Stockton Street, wrapped in the upward ripple of brick steps. Passersby stop, look, take photographs and smile.

Apple, apparently, has different ideas. A study of the plans shows no sign of the fountain. The broad, inviting steps are gone.
asawa_san_francisco_fountain.jpg
Ruth Asawa's "Hyatt on Union Square Fountain" (Source: Wikimedia)
King is not optimistic that the San Francisco Planning Department will require a significant redesign of the proposed project, considering the praise already heaped upon Apple's plans by city officials, but he does hope that some tweaks can be made that at the very least would improve the pedestrian experience along Stockton Street and the public plaza.

Article Link: Apple's Plans for New Flagship San Francisco Store Receiving Criticism
 
The city council complains about the store that pays the most taxes in the whole of the USA (most likely). That's just absurd.

Apple could always take the store elsewhere.
 
I myself praise Apple's plans.

So could you please change the thread title to "Apple's Plans for New Flagship San Francisco Store Receiving Praise"?
 
The city council complains about the store that pays the most taxes in the whole of the USA (most likely). That's just absurd.

Apple could always take the store elsewhere.

Are you sure Apple is paying the most taxes in the "whole of the USA?"
 
That fountain looks awesome. It will be a shame to displace it with another metal and glass retail box.
 
I find Foster to be highly overrated. He designed the business school that I went to and it had been raining through the roof for more than 18 months. We are talking about a building that cost over £40m. He apparently doesn't believe in QA?
 
Well, one may not like the fountain but that plaza is quite nice and it'd be a shame to loose it for a box.

On an architectural/engineering note the designer is an idiot that obviously doesn't take location into account because a huge glass wall with direct sunlight all day will turn that box into an oven. The PG&E bills in the summer and fall will probably cost more then their likely to sell in a month...
 
Does the shop actually slant downwards towards the back like that, or is the perspective just seriously messed up in that mock-up?
 
The city council complains about the store that pays the most taxes in the whole of the USA (most likely). That's just absurd.

Apple could always take the store elsewhere.

Drivel and nonsense in every word you wrote, that's what's absurd. Get some reading comprehension and stop making stuff up. It's just silly.
 
The city council complains about the store that pays the most taxes in the whole of the USA (most likely). That's just absurd.

Apple could always take the store elsewhere.

Do you even read the article?

There is no complaints from the city council. There is no mention of city council at all. There is a mention of city officials and they are falling head over heels about it.

The complaint or criticism comes from some critic. This is San Francisco, somebody complains about something everyday. I'm surprised some supervisor hasn't made a stink about it. (Regardless if its in their district or not)
 
Does the shop actually slant downwards towards the back like that, or is the perspective just seriously messed up in that mock-up?

I thought it was just the top floor buttress so to speak. where it needs to be thicker in the back to account for now support underneath.

*I am not an engineer or architect to know though.
 
I thought it was just the top floor buttress so to speak. where it needs to be thicker in the back to account for now support underneath.

*I am not an engineer or architect to know though.

Yeah, I suppose that would explain it, although it's still messing with my mind. :confused:
 
Guy is right, the proposed store looks pretty boring. I'm all for glass use, but that dead wall on one side.. ugly box. Apple can do better should have tried to save the fountain.
 
I find Foster to be highly overrated. He designed the business school that I went to and it had been raining through the roof for more than 18 months. We are talking about a building that cost over £40m. He apparently doesn't believe in QA?

You're aware that architects don't actually BUILD the things they design, right? Architecture and construction are two completely different things. It's not like Foster is strapping on a hard hat and building the thing. Once they design it they're done.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.