Why? Every reviewers says you barely/not notice the difference so they all conclude that except whern you would put it right in front of a window with direct sunlight it doesnt matter.
So why would a sound engineer/lawyer/doctor/scientist/programmer/... first buy such a monitor? Its expensive and he doesnt need it to be color accurate for those professions and
A) Because they want a quality Apple monitor and they have the income to allow for nice things.
B) A potential client is more likely to be wowed by your expensive studio display vs a boring black box LG.
A Mercedes costs more than a Toyota, but they'll get you there at exactly the same time in traffic.
second why would he need 600nits where 500 wont do ?
Having the extra brightness
if needed is better than not having it and needing it.
Yeah none of those so no its an excuse for people to justify the extra cost.
Over what? The wobbly, plasticky LG with random issues ?
If you are happy with the LG's price, get the LG in full knowledge it doesn't look as good on the outside & doesn't feature as much tech on the inside.
IMHO the ASD Based on industrial design and build alone looks like it
should cost 25%+ more than the LG. Whereas If Apple had thrown this display in a cheap plastic chassis and added some generic speakers like everyone else does, it should be on-par price-wise.
Assuming the ASD webcam issues are fixed soon, and
if the new version of the LG 5k comes in below $1000, THATS an argument worth having.