But compared to Objective-C, the code is so much cleaner.
Yeah, it's kinda amazing what a few little tweaks to a language will do to the code written.
But compared to Objective-C, the code is so much cleaner.
I want to start learning Swift, since it seems like a clean slate (no coding experience all). Anybody know of a good step by step resource (not video based) I could follow?
I thought most iOS apps were made with Objective C. How can it be so far down on the list?
There are still billions and billions of 8051 and other tiny microcontrollers and DSPs running things in this world.Wow... Assembly is at #13.
The majority of those Obj C apps were initially developed before Swift was introduced (or before Swift was mature enough). The TIOBE index is slanted towards what developers are doing when coding stuff today.
There are still billions and billions of 8051 and other tiny microcontrollers and DSPs running things in this world.
I want to start learning Swift, since it seems like a clean slate (no coding experience all). Anybody know of a good step by step resource (not video based) I could follow?
Any version in particular? You linked to 3.0.1 but it seems like the latest is 3.1?Have you downloaded Apple's book?
I want to start learning Swift, since it seems like a clean slate (no coding experience all). Anybody know of a good step by step resource (not video based) I could follow?
Looks like the 3.1 version says Beta on it. Whichever you prefer.Any version in particular? You linked to 3.0.1 but it seems like the latest is 3.1?
If you want multilingual, you can always learn more languages like Objective-C, C, C++, Java, Python, Ruby, BASIC, and so on. Swift uses one language: Swift. And if you suggest that keywords should be adapted from other languages, that is a rat's nest of evil problems waiting for the developer.Especially since Swift is aimed at kids learning programming, why is it not multilingual?
And it is completely unspecified how these percentages are measured and what they mean.
0.68% ? So close to VisualBasic .NET... Are you serious? Okay. 0.68 isn't in any way RAPIDLY.
Unless spell check mangled your OTOH, what's OHTD? Serious question, tryin' to keep up here lol.Most Java applications are server side these days.
Blame the developers for the crap applications you've used, not the language.
OHTD, I've used some great Java applications on the desktop.
...and one Objective-C freelancer claimed last week that Swift is not worth it, since the language is still changing (not since version 3).
Must be an Enterprise Developer top heavy survey, as Java is nearly dead on Linux and OS X, outside of Mission Critical legacy.
Unless spell check mangled your OTOH, what's OHTD? Serious question, tryin' to keep up here lol.
For being a language only 4 or so years old, to get up to #10 is rapid, particularly when there is a lot of competition with long established languages.
I'm surprised JavaScript is so low on the list. I would have thought top 5 these days.
.....
But compared to Objective-C, the code is so much cleaner.
Of course the one i hate the most is number 1.
This is about as scientific as Groundhog day.No, it is completely clear where these numbers come from. What you meant to say is that you either didn't read the summary or click into the link. As the article states, this is the TIOBE, which you can read about here: <http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/programming-languages-definition/>. Of course, what these numbers "mean" (besides that they're the result of calculations based on these criteria) is less clear--they're obviously trying to measure the use or popularity of programing languages, but the real question is how that should be measured. This is just one way of attempting to do that.