Audacity
It's the same crazy notion of industry change. With ipods and itunes, they went to change the game of music. Today, we buy singles, online, for $1.29 with no DRM. Even 5 years ago, I'd say you were out of your mind to think that Apple would outsell Wal*Mart in music.
Then the iPhone. It's still years ahead of most phones, and while it's not doing any one thing that's all that unique, it has completely changed the mobile market from a smattering of smart phones to an expectation that your phone can use the internet reasonably. Remember number-key navigation? Yuck.
Now, I think it's all about being the book-reader's friend. It's an industry, and that's what Apple tackles. They are out to change print because they have a proven distribution method, ease of use, and the ability to sign large publishing houses, newspapers, and textbook makers based on the fact that those companies will finally have a distribution path.
The New York Times doesn't have a distribution path with the ability to reach as many readers as Apple. Think about that... thus, why not totally change the game in their favor? We own a Kindle, and it's a good device. Is it worth a damn when looking through the "store"? Hell no. And that is where everyone has missed, and Apple has gotten so right over the last 5 years.
It's not the e-ink. It's the ease that the device can ring up more sales after you own it. The iPod w/ iTunes is EASY to buy music, despite having so many "free" outlets. The iPhone is EASY to buy apps, despite having smartphones been around for so long, and now apple has over 90% rev of all mobile apps. Now, it's time for someone to make it EASY TO CONSUME PRINT MEDIA.
Thus, I'll be the first to present, the iBook.