Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If Apple thinks this is “reinventing” the iPhone then I have a very different meaning of that word.

The 17’s were more of the same (the 12 through 17 phones have been pretty much the same tired old design), but the Air was all new. The folding phone is meh, the Android makers have been doing them for years, Apple continues to play catch up. That’s a phone probably very few people will buy anyways.

They still have a chance to do something with the anniversary edition phone. I hope it’s not simply more of the same with a tiny change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bzgnyc2
"...technology that "reduces the crease without eliminating it entirely."

That technology is called: "we can't get rid of the crease. Samsung has been selling the crease for 8 years; their disciples still buy it. Our disciples will buy it."
 
Who would pay the same to have less screen and battery? People aren't stupid.
Are you new here? Have you read comments here? Every iPhone Air lover here is like "I love it, except for...", or "...but wish it had", or, "but they need to add...".

That's some great phone (if they would just add)!
 
I strongly disagree.
If you sell me a small iPhone and a large iPhone at similar prices, it's obvious that the bigger one is the best option for the bucks.
Who would pay the same to have less screen and battery? People aren't stupid.
There will always be an audience that likes small phones. I'm sure some hundreds of thousands to millions love their Minis.

However, the audience isn't large enough for Apple to keep it as a SKU. Not enough millions.

This isn't 2010 Apple anymore.
 
Apple is now the 45 yr old who peaked in high school. Grow up

Stop trying to reinvent ****. Instead develop a proper range of products. Not just random one offs, like the Mini.

All those people that bought one now don't have an easy upgrade path. Its either deal with larger phone or make do with an older phone
 
Apple is now the 45 yr old who peaked in high school. Grow up

Stop trying to reinvent ****. Instead develop a proper range of products. Not just random one offs, like the Mini.

All those people that bought one now don't have an easy upgrade path. Its either deal with larger phone or make do with an older phone
I have the iPad Pro 2018 redesign and haven’t had a need to upgrade.
 
I’m hoping the rumors about the 20th anniversary device are wrong. Otherwise, Apple runs a high risk of a year of low phone sales, with only collectors and extreme Applefans buying it to put on a shelf and admire.

Special anniversary edition products tend to not be used, or, if they are used, held onto for an extended period of time, depressing the next year’s sales.
You sound like an Apple shareholder. 😉
 
Apple largely has a software problem. Their hardware good/great. There are no Windows laptops that can touch Macbooks in terms of fit/finish/power management/battery life.

IMHO there is absolutely no Apple software that I like using. Safari, iMessage, mail, notes, photos, pod casts etc are not horrible but not even close to being good. My Apple devices are launch pads for other companies software.

With iOS 26 and MacOS 26 their OS has reached a point where it is getting in my way of using the OS with very poor UI design choices. This is making me seriously question of me using Apple devices in the future.
 
Apple largely has a software problem. Their hardware good/great. There are no Windows laptops that can touch Macbooks in terms of fit/finish/power management/battery life.

IMHO there is absolutely no Apple software that I like using. Safari, iMessage, mail, notes, photos, pod casts etc are not horrible but not even close to being good. My Apple devices are launch pads for other companies software.

With iOS 26 and MacOS 26 their OS has reached a point where it is getting in my way of using the OS with very poor UI design choices. This is making me seriously question of me using Apple devices in the future.
I disagree with you. I find Apple software and hardware to be 10 years ahead of anything out there.
 
I wonder if, between the introduction of the iPhone Air and the rumored 20th anniversary version, we might finally be done with iPhone numbers.
I sure hope so.
iPhone 21 Pro Max doesn’t exactly have the same ring to it.
If they continue to simply just call the iPhone Air the “new iPhone Air”, the iPhone fold or ultra or duo or whatever doesn’t get numbered and the 20th anniversary edition is just called the “next generation of iPhone Pro” or something like that, the era of numbers might be coming to a close.
Otherwise, they will either have to skip 19 entirely so they don’t introduce the 19 Pro as the 20th anniversary edition, do something extremely stupid like ‘iPhone XX’ or straight up just not called a pro at all, which doesn’t really seem likely to me.
I would surmise the iPhone will be the start of the yearly naming convention, just like iOS and MacOS. I could see iPhone 28, for the year 2028.
 
I just got to the part in the Pogue book where Jobs slices the products down to just 4: pro desktop, consumer desktop, pro laptop, consumer laptop. His goal was now they could revise them all every 9 months instead of every 18 and they could put their "A" team on every project. That's just not possible today. 4+ phones a year, 3+ laptops a year, 2+ iPads a year. We can already see the desktop Mac suffering as the Mac Pro is discontinued and we are still waiting on updates to iMac, Mac mini, and Mac Studio. There are too many products and not enough talent. Now they are supposedly working on all kinds of products for the home like iPads on homepods and iPads with robot arms and security cameras and doorbells. The number of products has exploded and it just feels like throwing spaghetti at the wall. Cut something. Anything.
 
From the macOS dictionary… reinvent: change (something) so much that it appears to be entirely new.

I feel Mark Gurman must using a different dictionary. 😜

-kp
 
  • Haha
Reactions: marte91
Give us an iPhone mini without latest tech but that costs around 500 dollars.
Mac Neo is selling like crazy because of its price.

I don't think people don't like small phones. People don't like small phones at a high price!!
It's a mistake to conflate the MacBook Neo with the iPhone mini. The MacBook Neo is the same weight and almost the same size as the MacBook Air, that's part of why it's so compelling. As much as I loved the iPhone 12 mini, it came with many more obvious compromises than the Neo. The other thing Apple should have learned by now is that in its various attempts to provide products at $100 price intervals, it seems that for the iPhone buyers aren't all that sensitive to $100. Especially if their phones end up on some sort of payment plan.
 
I don’t know anyone personally who would ever use a phone - or any expensive portable electronics - without a case on it.
I don't because I don't like the bulk. I never have. When I switched from my 12 Pro Max to a 17 Pro Max it still looked nearly flawless. (Battery life was pretty bad though...)

And I'm not always worrying about it or anything, I'm just neither careless nor clumsy.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: marte91
I do not trust modern Apple engineers to 'reinvent' anything whatsoever. I often wonder if the company is now populated with former Google employees. it makes me sad. This used to be such a vibrant company that set the stage, and now it's limping along after trends, some of which are quite old (Apple's version of Google Glass, foldable phones, etc., you get the idea).

Once again, in 2026, I am not particularly excited about much of what is in the pipeline, broadly. That said, Apple silicon is amazing, and it makes it a double shame they aren't doing anything whatsoever original with it. I might imagine the hardware teams are pulling out their hair looking at the software teams (Liquid Glass is still a piece of *bleep*. Installed it on my phone to test it, but it isn't going on my iPad or my Macs, not until the option is available to turn it off 100% completely, or if I no longer have a choice in buying new devices, and not having a choice is supremely un-Apple). Arbitrary nested menus on mobile devices, not just the interface, blah, blah, blah. And no, 'You'll get used to it.', is not at all sufficient. Conformity used to be the exact opposite of the ethos of this company.

I hate to say it: but today, I just throw the stickers that come alongside Apple products into the trash, and that did not used to be the case. Waiting for the Apple branded blender or refrigerator, because that is how remedial things have become. Truly sad.

Again, the hardware is world class; the ecosystem seems to be more and more designed by robots trying to make money. Just my opinions based on a great deal of experience. Haven't watched a keynote since 2013, because i simply don't care.

And yet: this is still somehow better than Microsoft or Google. It is madness.
 
I just got to the part in the Pogue book where Jobs slices the products down to just 4: pro desktop, consumer desktop, pro laptop, consumer laptop. His goal was now they could revise them all every 9 months instead of every 18 and they could put their "A" team on every project. That's just not possible today. 4+ phones a year, 3+ laptops a year, 2+ iPads a year. We can already see the desktop Mac suffering as the Mac Pro is discontinued and we are still waiting on updates to iMac, Mac mini, and Mac Studio. There are too many products and not enough talent. Now they are supposedly working on all kinds of products for the home like iPads on homepods and iPads with robot arms and security cameras and doorbells. The number of products has exploded and it just feels like throwing spaghetti at the wall. Cut something. Anything.
Apple just killed the Mac Pro. They let the iMac Pro be a one-off. They killed the last iPod touch not quite four years ago. They axed both the iPhone mini and Plus lines. With all the numerous SKUs and configurations available it can be easy to lose the forest for the trees. There are only a handful of trendsetting products where Apple will focus much of their hardware R&D resources:

- Apple Silicon (including the new modem and networking chips)
- iPhone Pro/Max for leading edge iPhone tech
- iPad Pro for leading edge iPad tech
- Mac Studio and MacBook Pro for leading edge Mac tech
- iPhone Air & MacBook Neo for introducing in-house chip solutions and new manufacturing processes
- AirPods and Apple Watch
- home platform including HomePod and perhaps Vision Pro

All other related products benefit from the cascading tech that comes from the leading edge products, including binned chips. It's much like how halo cars work in the automotive industry. We're all waiting to see improvement on the software side, mostly the AI stuff since that's been vaporware for so long. Almost a decade ago Apple was in a 180-degree position where its hardware was completely stagnant thanks to Intel while software was running much more smoothly. It's cyclical.
 
I strongly disagree.
If you sell me a small iPhone and a large iPhone at similar prices, it's obvious that the bigger one is the best option for the bucks.
Who would pay the same to have less screen and battery? People aren't stupid.
This logic doesn’t hold up. Imagine if Apple made an iPhone with identical spec at every 0.1” interval between 5” and 7.5” (for reference, iPhone mini was 5.4 and pro max is 6.9). All the same, just 25 very specific sizes to choose from. Some people would pick the smallest one, probably more would pick the biggest. But this is a category with a limit: most people are going to pick one somewhere in the middle. Personally, I’d like something a little smaller than the current 17 Pro but not as small as a mini.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.