Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It is unclear exactly why the Studio Display XDR has a higher-end A19 Pro chip, but it certainly tracks with this model having more powerful features, such as a 120Hz refresh rate, mini-LED backlighting, and increased brightness

...does it track with any of that, though? How does additional processing power help make the screen brighter?

Certainly tracks with a higher price.
 
I'm just laughing at the photos Apple is using on their website. I wanna know what company outside of Cupertino is spending thousands of dollars on 27" monitors to look over some generic office documents. I hope they opted for that nano option with those windows.

HR: "Sorry Cindy, we can't give you a raise do to your monitor expensive budget."

hero__fjwz2k1uofue_large.png
 
Apple could've released these as specialty purposed iMacs with the ability to work in Target Display Mode (remember that super useful iMac feature??).

Or, they could literally act as supplemental processing power for whatever computer you’ve plugged into it. I highly doubt that center stage, desk view, Siri, and the surround sound audio system is particularly taxing on the A19 and A19 Pro.
 
I have so many questions why a monitor needs an A19 Pro. Local dimming zone speed in conjunction with a high refresh rate? There are a lot of 4k 240hz+ monitors and i will bet they don't have anywhere near the processing power of an A19 Pro.
Monitors need beefier processors now and its much cheaper for Apple to just use an iphone chip then for them to custom fab a new one
 
Waiting for new Mac Studio’s…… that may wreck my bank account. My old Studio Display is doing fine. Anybody else get the dock burn into the screen? I have to hide the dock to stop it…..
How do you get burn-in on an LCD screen???
My concern with the Studio Display is whether it ends up with dust trails like my last 2 imacs did. Due to the internal heat and fans in the imac.
Has anyone found this problem in the Studio Displays??
 
Would be insanely great if they gave us access to the NPU on the XDR.

I know it won't happen, but it would be really, really cool.

They should use that chip to allow the display to act as an Apple TV

The least they could do is allow running macOS on the display, with an attache USB drive.
If I remember correctly, the A13 in the Studio display was actually an iPhone board, complete with 64 GB storage. If these A19 chips do the same and come with 256 GB storage, why don't Apple sell these as standalone iMacs that can also have a Mac connected to it. Especially at the price of the XDR model!
 
  • Like
Reactions: noraa and klasma
Monitors need beefier processors now and its much cheaper for Apple to just use an iphone chip then for them to custom fab a new one
That's what I'm guessing too. I want to say it's likely a great way to use up binned chips that aren't quite good enough to meet the standards for use in the iPhone. Maybe they can't clock as high, or more cores need to be disabled than make sense for the Phone, but it's completely fine for a display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Funny Apple Man
Cue all the 'I can't believe they run iOS' posts.

That said, @jdphoto makes a great point. I mean - with just a little extra engineering, we could have a monitor that could serve as a standalone secondary Mac. I don't know what I'd do with that of course...
What would be more interesting, is that when connected, that monitor chip would assist parent/child (master/slave) to the Mac to assist with additional task.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noraa and CalMin
Am I the only one who sees “the display has an entire computer inside it” to be a concerning issue in context to “complexity is the chief opponent of reliability [and affordability]”?
 
Have not had it yet. My display is only a little over a year old though.
If it happens, don’t freak out, I’ve had it a couple years… it goes away if you hide dock and use light background for a while, google it, it isn’t permanent but is annoying…
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
I'm just laughing at the photos Apple is using on their website. I wanna know what company outside of Cupertino is spending thousands of dollars on 27" monitors to look over some generic office documents. I hope they opted for that nano option with those windows.

HR: "Sorry Cindy, we can't give you a raise do to your monitor expensive budget."

hero__fjwz2k1uofue_large.png

I mean it's just $4000 in studio displays with the height adjustable stand. She's sitting in a $3000 herman miller eames soft pad chair.


It might actually be a $4000 variant lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: apple020997
Am I the only one who sees “the display has an entire computer inside it” to be a concerning issue in context to “complexity is the chief opponent of reliability [and affordability]”?
In all honesty I think one reason Apple puts these chips in there is to ‘justify’ the prices, throw a 50$ chip in there and add 500$ to the price
 
Suppose that means they're doing a lot of stuff in software (on a sorta general purpose SoC) that most monitor manufacturers would just buy a mass produced asic or purpose built microcontroller for.

Kinda neat. Kinda weird. Fun times.
The A13 in the original made the Studio Display behave like an iMac. It enabled always on siri, center stage camera, and spatial audio. It also instantly turns on if your using a magic keyboard with touch id.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.