I have so many questions why a monitor needs an A19 Pro. Local dimming zone speed in conjunction with a high refresh rate? There are a lot of 4k 240hz+ monitors and i will bet they don't have anywhere near the processing power of an A19 Pro.
To do what, exactly?Would be insanely great if they gave us access to the NPU on the XDR.
I know it won't happen, but it would be really, really cool.
It is unclear exactly why the Studio Display XDR has a higher-end A19 Pro chip, but it certainly tracks with this model having more powerful features, such as a 120Hz refresh rate, mini-LED backlighting, and increased brightness
Monitors need beefier processors now and its much cheaper for Apple to just use an iphone chip then for them to custom fab a new oneI have so many questions why a monitor needs an A19 Pro. Local dimming zone speed in conjunction with a high refresh rate? There are a lot of 4k 240hz+ monitors and i will bet they don't have anywhere near the processing power of an A19 Pro.
How do you get burn-in on an LCD screen???Waiting for new Mac Studio’s…… that may wreck my bank account. My old Studio Display is doing fine. Anybody else get the dock burn into the screen? I have to hide the dock to stop it…..
That must be dust, not burn-in. I've had that on my last few imacs.Got it on my 5k iMac
Would be insanely great if they gave us access to the NPU on the XDR.
I know it won't happen, but it would be really, really cool.
They should use that chip to allow the display to act as an Apple TV
If I remember correctly, the A13 in the Studio display was actually an iPhone board, complete with 64 GB storage. If these A19 chips do the same and come with 256 GB storage, why don't Apple sell these as standalone iMacs that can also have a Mac connected to it. Especially at the price of the XDR model!The least they could do is allow running macOS on the display, with an attache USB drive.
That's what I'm guessing too. I want to say it's likely a great way to use up binned chips that aren't quite good enough to meet the standards for use in the iPhone. Maybe they can't clock as high, or more cores need to be disabled than make sense for the Phone, but it's completely fine for a display.Monitors need beefier processors now and its much cheaper for Apple to just use an iphone chip then for them to custom fab a new one
What would be more interesting, is that when connected, that monitor chip would assist parent/child (master/slave) to the Mac to assist with additional task.Cue all the 'I can't believe they run iOS' posts.
That said, @jdphoto makes a great point. I mean - with just a little extra engineering, we could have a monitor that could serve as a standalone secondary Mac. I don't know what I'd do with that of course...
if anybody at Apple marketing is reading this, just know I was ready to order one of these ASAP but forcing Tahoe is a dealbreaker.
If it happens, don’t freak out, I’ve had it a couple years… it goes away if you hide dock and use light background for a while, google it, it isn’t permanent but is annoying…Have not had it yet. My display is only a little over a year old though.
A better question would be why would it be there in the first place, if it cannot be utilized properly?To do what, exactly?
Memories of when a printer (the first LaserWriter) was IIRC more powerful than the Macs of the time.It’s funny how a display is more powerful than a newly released full-fledged computer
I'm just laughing at the photos Apple is using on their website. I wanna know what company outside of Cupertino is spending thousands of dollars on 27" monitors to look over some generic office documents. I hope they opted for that nano option with those windows.
HR: "Sorry Cindy, we can't give you a raise do to your monitor expensive budget."
![]()
In all honesty I think one reason Apple puts these chips in there is to ‘justify’ the prices, throw a 50$ chip in there and add 500$ to the priceAm I the only one who sees “the display has an entire computer inside it” to be a concerning issue in context to “complexity is the chief opponent of reliability [and affordability]”?
The A13 in the original made the Studio Display behave like an iMac. It enabled always on siri, center stage camera, and spatial audio. It also instantly turns on if your using a magic keyboard with touch id.Suppose that means they're doing a lot of stuff in software (on a sorta general purpose SoC) that most monitor manufacturers would just buy a mass produced asic or purpose built microcontroller for.
Kinda neat. Kinda weird. Fun times.
Maybe they needed A chip with stronger gpuIt’s funny how a display is more powerful than a newly released full-fledged computer
They should use that chip to allow the display to act as an Apple TV