The name has zero effect on the conference. Renaming it to "Apple Developer Conference" makes a ton of sense, does it not?
debatable yet so could the current name. Bet best rebuttal yet.
[automerge]1574308421[/automerge]
Not sure that launching into a rant about the history of the macOS brand, the executives behind it, NeXT, and Macworld was the best idea for proving that you weren’t overly upset about something as inconsequential as the name of the former WWDC app.
Through all of that, you actually answered your own question, though.
there is some relevance ... you may not agree and that's fine but the recent changes and who's made them does have some relevance. Anyone recall the opening of WWDC 2018/17 ... the first few minutes yeah you'll understand were I'm coming from then.
[automerge]1574308569[/automerge]
that's the problem. i didn't notice because i thought the WWDC app only had new content around WWDC time. you just gave a reason for Apple to change the name of the app.
not really you didn't notice because it was Apple whom never advertised the change. That's not your fault or other developers/users ... Apple just needed to broadcast the update ... or enable the push notifications. Then again many may have deleted it shortly after the conference was over. Again Apple needed to publicly update the change like their doing now. it's simplicity really. not sure why nobody is seeing it on my view but alas glad people have different views it's healthy for us all. but I can fully see where you're coming from.
[automerge]1574308805[/automerge]
Apple is a marketing company not a tech developer company. This makes perfect sense, they can't have something techy, read nerdy, like WWDC when they want to rub shoulders with the Hollywood elite.
Huh?
Xcode, SWIFT, AppleScript, developing many of their own software in which they heavily use internally or purchasing other companies for software and rapidly and exponentially increase functionality internally. An example of the latter LOGIC ... Apple purchase it and massively increased it with so many features and instruments and functionality with good integration into Final Cut which I think they created in-house not 1000% sure on the latter. So I think you're not fully correct, but I do agree their HUGE in marketing.
[automerge]1574308942[/automerge]
Here’s something that may shock you. You can also use iMovie to make more than movie. And it is ok to make a one page document in Pages.
Developers is the plural, btw. Which Apple uses correctly, but you haven’t here - developer’s is the singular possessive.
FRAQ ... you killed me there
iMovie is a brand for software, so not a good example but nonetheless dead in my tracks.