As expected, you are not able to understand my argument. Professional reviewers test the display thoroughly. This:
http://www.theverge.com/2012/6/13/3082649/macbook-pro-review-retina-display-15-inch
does not look like a thorough review. Let me quote this amateurish review:
Amateurish-at best. No note about the measured contrast, the measured color gamut, the quality of the backlight et cetera. If you call this a review, then i do not know what you read in RL. I even doubt that you have read the above mentioned article.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5998/macbook-pro-retina-display-analysis
They do not say under which conditions and how they measured this. So it is an argument without any real proof-if at all. Let us assume they measured this in a black reference room, with very expensive professional equipment. Then we should ask, why do they not publish their "professional" method?
And do not tell me, "i trust anandtech.com", "i trust theverge.com" because this is not an argument, regarding the measurable quality of the display.
Spot on. At this stage everyone is just giving the omg it's sexy and cool review. Still waiting for someone to actually go into the details of the retina screen.