. . . and the faster charging . . .
Is that a definite feature on the S6?
Where did you read about faster charging please?
. . . and the faster charging . . .
Is that a definite feature on the S6?
Where did you read about faster charging please?
Hmmm, I've got the Apple Watch 3, and have been tempted each year to upgrade. I think that the most useful feature since the 3 is the always-on display, but I never got round to upgrading. Now the 6 is here, I'm tempted, but I'm also thinking that the 7 could bring about a big design upgrade. Like, no bezel, microLED and/or slimmer body. I suppose there's also that thinking of "What will next year bring, and should I hold out one more year?", but having said that:
What will next year bring, and should I hold out one more year? 😆
What will next year bring, and should I hold out one more year? 😆
Just wondering if anyone else is as careless as I am this year going from a 5 to a 6 series.
I still have time to cancel my order.
VO2 Max and spO2 Max are the only reason
Unless you want the oxygen sensor thing. In my opinion the stainless steel is a waste of money. It depends on your financial situation of course
If you’re counting selling last year’s stainless steel one then you would have to also count selling last year’s aluminum one for comparison.I’ve been able to sell all of my SS watches for ~$400 every year. This puts my Ti watches right around the cost of aluminum.
I’m not against the stainless steel watch. I’m just saying from a practical sense it doesn’t make sense to pay so much more for basically an upgraded finish. It’s like paying extra for a gold plated iPhone.
I agree. I guess I do not understand why people think they need to monitor their oxygen levels unless there is an underlying medical concern. The EKG sensor is different and more important I think as a monitoring device. But outside of the novelty, I do not think the oxygen sensor is something I would really need -- just another tool that creates needless worry.You should look up how OX levels work.
They are almost always the same and don’t really tell you anything interesting.
There is no way you will be able to judge sleep quality and recovery from blood oxygen levels.
I’m not against the stainless steel watch. I’m just saying from a practical sense it doesn’t make sense to pay so much more for basically an upgraded finish.
I agree. I guess I do not understand why people think they need to monitor their oxygen levels unless there is an underlying medical concern. The EKG sensor is different and more important I think as a monitoring device. But outside of the novelty, I do not think the oxygen sensor is something I would really need -- just another tool that creates needless worry.
I agree. I guess I do not understand why people think they need to monitor their oxygen levels unless there is an underlying medical concern. The EKG sensor is different and more important I think as a monitoring device. But outside of the novelty, I do not think the oxygen sensor is something I would really need -- just another tool that creates needless worry.
It's a good chunk of change for something where the battery degrades every year, though. May be wiser to just upgrade aluminum models as needed.
In-warranty battery service ought to be covered, as well as under AC+.
Out-of-warranty service by Apple is $79.
Apple Watch Service and Repair - Apple Support
Need to repair your Apple Watch? See your service options, their costs by coverage type, and how long they take.support.apple.com
I ordered it cuz I managed to sell my Series 5 for 300€ yesterday and therefore I only have to pay 140€
There’s no right answer to this as you say, it’s down to the individual. The aluminium for what it offers is worth more to me than the stainless model would and I’m not bothered about resale value as these watches lose so much of their worth in such a short space of time. I’ve never babied my aluminium watches and they’ve always survived knocks and scrapes without significant damage. Then again putting a mint condition watch in a drawer at the end of its life is less important to for me. We buy what we like don’t we? Not what others deem is better for them.Clearly this is an area which varies by individual, but I'll state what I see as the *practical* reason for DLC coated stainless vs aluminum as it applies to *me*.
tl;dr version - It is important to me for my watch to not look dinged up, and thus I find substantial practical value in not having to baby an SBSS watch like I've had to baby aluminum watches. That value to me exceeds the cost differential.
My first two AW's were space gray aluminum, and S2 followed by an S3 the next year.
Despite using a TPU cover during home/auto DIY stuff, and generally being very conscious to not damage the watch, I'd inevitably manage to ding up the aluminum casing in a way that was an annoying eyesore every time I looked at the watch.
Since switching to SBSS, I largely don't have to worry about damaging the watch. Sure, I'll still take it off for certain things that have a high change of causing damage, but otherwise I don't baby it or worry about getting scratched up.
My S4 SBSS remained in mint condition after a year's usage. My S5 currently also is in mint condition after a year's usage.
It's also worth noting that I do use the LTE capability, so the purchase price differential is ~$220. Resale difference between aluminum/LTE and SS tends to be ~80-100, though that differential may be higher with a dinged up aluminum watch vs a mint stainless.
This is what makes the SE look like such a good deal as a S4 owner myself. I have never had always on display, so I may not know what I'm missing. I can wait on that, I'm buying the SE for me and the wife and giving the S4 to the kids.I got the S4 and the upgrade still doesn‘t seem big enough for me.
I would likely use that oxygen sensor as much as i use the ECG... a few times at the beginning, to try it out.