Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don't think that's particularly fair. Loads of good intelligent people have kids too. It's all about what you want out of life.

Sure, but they generally have them later in life (ie; not when they're in their teens or early twenties) and they don't have an excessive number of kids.
 
Hmmmm... guess I'm a SINK. :p

Then you have the opportunity, along with the DINKs to become one of the TWITS: Those With Income To Squander.

That would be good, as you can squander some of it on personal assistants to help you with things that other people's kids do for them when you get too old to do them for yourself.
 
And this is how Idiocracy becomes a pre-documentary. The ignorant have litters of kids, and the intelligent chose not to...

Just remind me, Steve Jobs had kids right? I guess he must be unintelligent then?
If you want to have kids and are in a stable relationship then go for it . Nothing will ever be the same again. If your in a struggling relationship and you think having kids will bring you closer together then forget it.
But the decision has nothing to do with intelligence.
 
Sorry I've not read the book (does that make me a blasphemer on this site?) I just think intelligent and thick people both have kids. I also think its the same the other way round.

I agree with you 100% on that. And it doesn't make you a blasphemer. I admit I got a kick out of learning what a jerk he was. He's a little too deified on this site sometimes. But that's another discussion.
 
hehe..

Self fulfilling prophesy much ?

You do realize you just called your parents ignorent right ?

Indeed, they are not the smartest people, however, I did find my own path of enlightenment.

----------

Just remind me, Steve Jobs had kids right? I guess he must be unintelligent then?

One does not equate to the other. There are times when intelligent persons will have children, however, the trend is such that they won't overcome the litters of those far more ignorant and stubborn than those of the few.
 
I agree with you 100% on that. And it doesn't make you a blasphemer. I admit I got a kick out of learning what a jerk he was. He's a little too deified on this site sometimes. But that's another discussion.

Steve was a visionary to be sure. There is no doubt about that-not up for debate.

However, that does not mean he was a good parent. He was actually a pretty bad one. And he was quite the douchebag to his employees.

I think he definitely changed later in life, but we'll see his kids say in the future.
 
But in my experience, intelligent people do what is their best interest. Conceiving 1.7 children only to have them consume your time, money, and sanity for at LEAST 18 years (more like 25 by the standards of today) is simply not the intelligent thing to do. Just my opinion.

I understand why some people would choose not to have children, but this statement borders on ridiculous.

I have a child. I don't think of him "consuming" anything from me. He's a person, not a pet.
 
Well in some sense it's true. Instead of children being born into good income families with max opportunity to achieve, children are being born into families without as any opportunities or encouragement for intellectual development.

Exactly why my wife and I decided to have children - to tilt the balance the other way. :)

Seriously, watching my kids' lives unfold has led to some of the highest highs and the lowest lows, but it's never been boring. Although I realize that I probably could have retired by now if we hadn't had children, I don't regret the decision for a moment.

I respect people who've decided not to have kids, though. That's much better than having them because it's expected or because of family pressure.
 
(Dual Income no Kids)

I rarely create threads but as I approach 30 it is clear to me that I do not want children. My partner agrees and thus I feel we will be DINKs for life.

Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of kids, I hear the stories from those around me about how their kids have changed their lives. Of course, those stories are in between the points where they are complaining about their situation.

Thus far, the bad seems to outweigh the good from my perspective. Now to the parents it is likely not that way, those good moments erase the bad ones which is fantastic. For me though, why deal with the bad?

Which gets to the heart of it: I don't want the hassle. I enjoy my freedom, time, money and overall lifestyle. I can pursue my Masters, have a nice amount of free cash flow, pick up and go when I want, etc. It may sound selfish (it is do a degree, but I obviously share with my partner so I am not THAT selfish), but I simply do not think I want to enter into that kind of obligation.

That said, if we later change our mind, adoption will be the first (and likely only...) route we take, far too many children out there.

Anyhow, just wanted to sync with some other DINKs out there. When did you really know kids weren't for you? Do you forsee changing your position down the road?

At the moment I am a SINK. I am not opposed to marriage; if I was looking, I would look for a woman who doesn't want kids, because I can't have any (by choice -- had it taken care of 6 years ago). This complicates things for me, because ethnically I'm Korean, and I would prefer to marry a Korean woman. I haven't met a Korean woman yet who feels the same way that I do about not wanting kids.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.