I currently have all 3 checked, 5s (waiting on the 6+), MBP, and rMini. hahaha
And you use each one for...?
I currently have all 3 checked, 5s (waiting on the 6+), MBP, and rMini. hahaha
Have you ever owned a mini? The difference is still quite big in comparison to any 5.5" phone.
Yes I have. I haven't owned a 5.5" iPhone though.
Think for a second - why do people want a bigger screen iPhone? It's so they can browse the internet better. So they can watch videos on a bigger screen. Oh wait, isn't that what a tablet is used for? Many people want bigger screen phones so the device can double as a tablet and save money. Look at Korea - No one owns official 'tablets' in Korea, most people have large phones that double as tablets. It saves a significant amount of money.
No. I don't think you should. As I posted in another thread, IMO out of the three categories:
1) iPhone or iPod Touch
2) iPad or iPad Mini
3) Macbook Pro or Macbook Air
you should pick two. I cannot imagine a scenario where someone would get three, and extensively use all three. Sure, a few people might, but they are almost certainly in the extreme minority.
No. I don't think you should. As I posted in another thread, IMO out of the three categories:
1) iPhone or iPod Touch
2) iPad or iPad Mini
3) Macbook Pro or Macbook Air
you should pick two. I cannot imagine a scenario where someone would get three, and extensively use all three. Sure, a few people might, but they are almost certainly in the extreme minority.
What you want is a portable work machine, and a more portable play machine. If you get a third device, what would its purpose be?
I intend to have, within a month or two, an iPad. Then I will have a cheap (~$100 off contract) android phone (only used for calls/sms/maps/tethering), an iPad for mobile entertainment, my MBP for portable work, and my desktop for work and entertainment at home. All bases covered, but little overlap.
EDIT: Further note, I think the iPhone+ is encroaching on category 2 territory a bit too much. I think you might be able to justify getting a full-size iPad, if you don't also have a notebook, but choosing an iPad Mini over an iPad, when you already own an iPhone+, seems insane to me.
How so? I have an iPhone 5, retina iPad mini and retina MacBook Pro. I'm only a student and I would think I use all three of them quite extensively. And I know quite a few more people who have all three.
I have the current Retina Mini which is the 128GB LTE model, a 32GB iPad Air WiFi and just bought a Mac Mini. I use all three throughout the day.
And if your iPad self destructed, I'm sure you'd get by just fine. What is it that you can do on an iPad that you can't do equally well on either an iPhone of MBP???
On the other hand, if your iPhone self destructed instead, you could get a cheap phone, and again get by just fine.
OK, but why did you choose the iPad Mini over the iPhone??? (IMO, "Because it's way cheaper" is a perfectly valid reason)
And if your iPad self destructed, I'm sure you'd get by just fine. What is it that you can do on an iPad that you can't do equally well on either an iPhone of MBP???
On the other hand, if your iPhone self destructed instead, you could get a cheap phone, and again get by just fine.
Well tell me, why is anyone excited for it?
No. I don't think you should. As I posted in another thread, IMO out of the three categories:
1) iPhone or iPod Touch
2) iPad or iPad Mini
3) Macbook Pro or Macbook Air
you should pick two. I cannot imagine a scenario where someone would get three, and extensively use all three. Sure, a few people might, but they are almost certainly in the extreme minority.
No. I don't think you should. As I posted in another thread, IMO out of the three categories:
1) iPhone or iPod Touch
2) iPad or iPad Mini
3) Macbook Pro or Macbook Air
you should pick two. I cannot imagine a scenario where someone would get three, and extensively use all three. Sure, a few people might, but they are almost certainly in the extreme minority.
What you want is a portable work machine, and a more portable play machine. If you get a third device, what would its purpose be?
I intend to have, within a month or two, an iPad. Then I will have a cheap (~$100 off contract) android phone (only used for calls/sms/maps/tethering), an iPad for mobile entertainment, my MBP for portable work, and my desktop for work and entertainment at home. All bases covered, but little overlap.
EDIT: Further note, I think the iPhone+ is encroaching on category 2 territory a bit too much. I think you might be able to justify getting a full-size iPad, if you don't also have a notebook, but choosing an iPad Mini over an iPad, when you already own an iPhone+, seems insane to me.
I have all 3. iPhone 5S, iPad rMini, Macbook Pro.
Obviously the iPhone and Macbook get the most use but the Macbook is pretty heavy to carry in my bag all day long so usually I just leave it at home and bring the iPad Mini unless I need to do something that requires a full computer. I think the size of the Mini is what finally made iPads viable for me. I always felt the full sized iPads were too big and close to the Macbook Pro so I could never find a use for them. The Mini is small enough to stand out on its own and be ultraportable.
I won't be getting the iPhone 6 or 6+ even though I have upgrades available. Planning to wait for the 6S next year.
Just recently upgraded from the 1st Gen Mini to the rMini and don't plan to get the iPad Mini 3 this year as all I expect to see is TouchID and performance increases. I'm fine with what I have for now.
But a 5.5" phone is still nowhere close to as good at any of that stuff as a 7.9" tablet. The tablet will be better for reading, watching movies and browsing the web. I can't imagine annotating a large PDF on a 5.5" phone, while it's incredibly simple on my iPad mini.
If you didn't have a passcode on your phone, used a very weak passcode, or very rarely unlock your phone (or other devices), then the benefits of TouchID might seem minimal. It's hardly a hassle to use, though; just press down on the home button to turn the screen on, leave your finger resting on the button, and the phone unlocks. It's faster and involves less effort than swiping the screen or typing in a passcode. As an added bonus, you don't even need to be looking at your screen, and it's a one-handed operation that doesn't involve any extra movements.Yeah I tried the 5s. I don't get how it's a feature people are excited for. I pretty much turned it completely off
If you didn't have a passcode on your phone, used a very weak passcode, or very rarely unlock your phone (or other devices), then the benefits of TouchID might seem minimal. It's hardly a hassle to use, though; just press down on the home button to turn the screen on, leave your finger resting on the button, and the phone unlocks. It's faster and involves less effort than swiping the screen or typing in a passcode. As an added bonus, you don't even need to be looking at your screen, and it's a one-handed operation that doesn't involve any extra movements.
The real beauty of it comes in when you're frequently locking and unlocking a device, particularly if it has a passcode that is longer than the default four-digit code. In my case, I use my iPad for work. It has a passcode that is much longer than four digits, and it gets locked and unlocked multiple times per hour. While I'm pretty fast at pounding out that code, TouchID would save me a lot of time and effort, and it would probably be more secure (because as fast as I am, someone who is really dedicated could probably note the code that I type in).
As of iOS 8, normal use cases will be able to benefit as other apps will be able to utilize the TouchID sensor as well. It's a wonderful technology. It was intriguing when it was announced, but once I bought an iPhone 5S and saw how well it worked, I felt that it was a "must-have" feature on the iPads as well.
The most common explanation given is that the customers in Asia do not have the money to buy several $x00 device to satisfy all those niches of use perfection. They buy one ~$600 device that covers a phone, tablet and maybe even an entry level computer.
Compromise is a rich man' dilemma. If you don't have the money, it's not such a big deal.
i was sure they would put 2gb ram in it last year...
was also missing touchID
decided to vote with my wallet and not buy it. (as if they cared...)
might buy it this year if they fix both. not sure yet.
That is still not a reason to "second guess" and not update the mini this year as the guy above said.
I know that a 5.5" device will work for many as a compromise between a phone and a tablet, but many people seem to think that a 5.5" phone is too close to a 7.9" tablet and that it will canibalize the sales (some even say that it will make it irrelevant). All I'm saying is that there is no way that will happen, as they still are different devices.
I agree that the mini will definitely be updated. But, you cant discount the fact that the two product lines are getting close to each other. The iPad's got smaller a couple of years ago and the iPhone's got larger this year. They are within a couple of inches of screen size from each other. There is bound to be some interaction in market dynamics between them and it will be interesting to see how Apple manages to maintain niche separation between the two in the long run. The iPod Touch may feel the pinch of these two giant product lines moving closer to each other. If anything, the Touch maybe in real danger of being relegated now.