Arguing pilots fly 150 miles past runway

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by GoCubsGo, Oct 23, 2009.

  1. GoCubsGo macrumors Nehalem

    GoCubsGo

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    #1
    Article Link

    "Arguing" pilots fly 150 miles past runway ... yeah right. First it was "distracted", then it was "they were having a conversation on airline policy", now it's "arguing".

    We put our lives in these pilot's hands every day, if something such as some "argument" can distract them more than city lights then I'm rather surprised.

    The article also says no one noticed the fight had taken a detour. While this is probably true, I think I'd notice if my flight was to land at 8 pm, there was no decent, and an 1h 15m later I was on the ground. I think I'd notice if my flight wasn't landing on time.
     
  2. swiftaw macrumors 603

    swiftaw

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Location:
    Omaha, NE, USA
    #2
    The rumor is that the were actually asleep, since there was no radio contact with them for several hours. (Air traffic control even contacted the airlines head office to see if them could contact the plane via other methods).
     
  3. iBlue macrumors Core

    iBlue

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Location:
    London, England
  4. whooleytoo macrumors 603

    whooleytoo

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2002
    Location:
    Cork, Ireland.
    #4
    Hah!

    Reminds me of a scene from The Quiet Man. :p
     
  5. IntheNet macrumors regular

    IntheNet

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    #5
    Curious whether Northwest will charge passengers for the extra 150 mile transport...

    :D
     
  6. yg17 macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
  7. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #7
    I'd demand the additional frequent flyer miles, at the least.
     
  8. Don't panic macrumors 603

    Don't panic

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Location:
    having a drink at Milliways
    #8
    i was thinking the exact same thing :D:D:D
     
  9. eawmp1 macrumors 601

    eawmp1

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Location:
    FL
    #9
    He probably deflated and it took the flight attendant 150 miles to reinflate him.
     
  10. whooleytoo macrumors 603

    whooleytoo

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2002
    Location:
    Cork, Ireland.
    #10
    Brave man! Those guys were arguing for 150 miles. I don't think I'd demand anything. I think I'd ask very, very nicely. :)
     
  11. Gregg2 macrumors 603

    Joined:
    May 22, 2008
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    #11
    Distracted by a heated discussion over airline policy to the point that they ignored the control tower trying to "hand off" their flight to another jurisdiction? I don't think so. The voice recorder will tell all.
     
  12. dmr727 macrumors G3

    dmr727

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    #12
    Most likely they fell asleep. This kind of mistake is almost impossible otherwise. Like Gregg2 mentioned, the CVR will reveal what really happened.
     
  13. GoCubsGo thread starter macrumors Nehalem

    GoCubsGo

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    #13
    So the CVR records everything? I mean, everything? So if there is silence then these morons going on record saying it was a conversation that distracted them are toast as well?

    I ask because only seeing cockpits I can't imagine allowing yourself to become so distracted by anything that it would result in you missing a landing. It would seem that a seasoned pilot would at least know better and I don't think there are too many newbie pilots working for NWA/Delta.
     
  14. dmr727 macrumors G3

    dmr727

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    #14
    Basically, yes. That's what's bothering me - I can't believe they'd go on record and say one thing if they know the CVR will show something else. And you're right about the rest. That's what makes me think they simply fell asleep. It's happened before - Frontier had an Airbus crew fall asleep a few years back coming into Denver. Mesa (Go! Jets) overflew Hawaii not too long ago.

    Fatigue is definitely a problem in the industry, but nobody has stepped up to the plate to really fix it.
     
  15. sushi Moderator emeritus

    sushi

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    Location:
    キャンプスワ&#
    #15
    I think that their loud snoring may indicate otherwise. :eek:

    What is the recording limit for a CVR. Thirty minutes right. So we may never know what happened during that time frame.

    As far as falling asleep in the cockpit. It happens ... unfortunately.
     
  16. GoCubsGo thread starter macrumors Nehalem

    GoCubsGo

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
  17. dmr727 macrumors G3

    dmr727

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    #17
    The reg states at least 30 minutes, but at least with the CVRs I've been familiar with, the ambient channels will record the last hour. Of course I have no idea what this particular CVR will do, so you may be right.
     
  18. whooleytoo macrumors 603

    whooleytoo

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2002
    Location:
    Cork, Ireland.
    #18
  19. yg17 macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #19
    So if they fly an hour past MSP, by the time they turn around and land, the last hour recorded will be the hour after they realized their mistake. Maybe we'll hear them making up a story though.
     
  20. dmr727 macrumors G3

    dmr727

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    #20
    It's possible. They didn't fly an hour past - they were out of communication for an hour. But yeah, sushi's point still stands - with the taxi time included, it could have easily been more than 30 minutes from the point they turned around to the point they arrived at the gate.
     
  21. sushi Moderator emeritus

    sushi

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    Location:
    キャンプスワ&#
    #21
    So we may never know what really happened unless the investigators get the pilots to stumble over their agreed excuse/reason. :(

    About 20 years ago, there was a push to have longer tapes "recordings" if you will since 30 minutes is not always long enough. I forget the reason, but that idea didn't get traction and we still have 30 minutes.

    Fatigue in the cockpit can definitely happen. Been there done that. I will say a little chewing tobacco stuck in the bottom of your eyelid will keep them open ... usually. Unless you are really tired.
     
  22. dmr727 macrumors G3

    dmr727

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    #22
    I was just looking at my wife's FAR/FC, specifically 121.359, and the good news is that the FAA will mandate that it be two hours by April 7, 2012. That doesn't help here, but at least they're moving forward.
     
  23. yg17 macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #23
    Given how cheap storage is nowadays, couldn't they just record the entire flight, even the long 18 hour ones? It seems like that would make the most sense. 2 hours might not even be enough for some incidents depending on when the problem starts
     
  24. MooneyFlyer macrumors 65816

    MooneyFlyer

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Location:
    Boston
    #24
    I've heard taht the Airbus's already carry the solid state cockpit flight recorders in many of their planes (if not all). They should have the full two hours.

    At night it is pretty easy to see major cities go by. Unless these guys were physically wrestling I'm having a hard time understanding how an argument could keep them out of reasonable situational awareness for that long. I'm a pilot, I can see how things like this can happen, but I am hugely skeptical of this story.
     
  25. sushi Moderator emeritus

    sushi

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    Location:
    キャンプスワ&#
    #25
    Thanks for the info. Good news!
     

Share This Page